IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v19y2019i9p1569-1577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can machine learning approaches predict corporate bankruptcy? Evidence from a qualitative experimental design

Author

Listed:
  • Salim Lahmiri
  • Stelios Bekiros

Abstract

Bankruptcy prediction has received a growing interest in corporate finance and risk management recently. Although numerous studies in the literature have dealt with various statistical and artificial intelligence classifiers, their performance in credit risk forecasting needs to be further scrutinized compared to other methods. In the spirit of Chen, Härdle and Moro (2011, Quantitative Finance), we design an empirical study to assess the effectiveness of various machine learning topologies trained with big data approaches and qualitative, rather than quantitative, information as input variables. The experimental results from a ten-fold cross-validation methodology demonstrate that a generalized regression neural topology yields an accuracy measurement of 99.96%, a sensitivity measure of 99.91% and specificity of 100%. Indeed, this specific model outperformed multi-layer back-propagation networks, probabilistic neural networks, radial basis functions and regression trees, as well as other advanced classifiers. The utilization of advanced nonlinear classifiers based on big data methodologies and machine learning training generates outperforming results compared to traditional methods for bankruptcy forecasting and risk measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Salim Lahmiri & Stelios Bekiros, 2019. "Can machine learning approaches predict corporate bankruptcy? Evidence from a qualitative experimental design," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1569-1577, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:19:y:2019:i:9:p:1569-1577
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2019.1588468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2019.1588468
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2019.1588468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salman Bahoo & Marco Cucculelli & Xhoana Goga & Jasmine Mondolo, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-46, February.
    2. Wei Li & Florentina Paraschiv & Georgios Sermpinis, 2021. "A Data-driven Explainable Case-based Reasoning Approach for Financial Risk Detection," Papers 2107.08808, arXiv.org.
    3. Sanghoon Lee & Keunho Choi & Donghee Yoo, 2023. "Building a core rule-based decision tree to explain the causes of insolvency in small and medium-sized enterprises more easily," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Haoming Wang & Xiangdong Liu, 2021. "Undersampling bankruptcy prediction: Taiwan bankruptcy data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Salim Lahmiri & Stelios Bekiros & Anastasia Giakoumelou & Frank Bezzina, 2020. "Performance assessment of ensemble learning systems in financial data classification," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 3-9, January.
    6. Hoang, Daniel & Wiegratz, Kevin, 2022. "Machine learning methods in finance: Recent applications and prospects," Working Paper Series in Economics 158, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    7. Adebayo Oshingbesan & Eniola Ajiboye & Peruth Kamashazi & Timothy Mbaka, 2022. "Model-Free Reinforcement Learning for Asset Allocation," Papers 2209.10458, arXiv.org.
    8. Kui Wang & Jie Wan & Gang Li & Hao Sun, 2022. "A Hybrid Algorithm-Level Ensemble Model for Imbalanced Credit Default Prediction in the Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Oleksandr Melnychenko, 2020. "Is Artificial Intelligence Ready to Assess an Enterprise’s Financial Security?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Sabek Amine, 2023. "Unveiling the diverse efficacy of artificial neural networks and logistic regression: A comparative analysis in predicting financial distress," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 16-32, July.
    11. Ahmed, Shamima & Alshater, Muneer M. & Ammari, Anis El & Hammami, Helmi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Nawaf Almaskati, 2022. "Machine learning in finance: Major applications, issues, metrics, and future trends," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-32, September.
    13. Wei Li & Florentina Paraschiv & Georgios Sermpinis, 2022. "A data-driven explainable case-based reasoning approach for financial risk detection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(12), pages 2257-2274, December.
    14. Amir Mukeri & Habibullah Shaikh & Dr. D. P. Gaikwad, 2020. "Financial Data Analysis Using Expert Bayesian Framework For Bankruptcy Prediction," Papers 2010.13892, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    15. Caglayan, Mustafa & Pham, Tho & Talavera, Oleksandr & Xiong, Xiong, 2020. "Asset mispricing in peer-to-peer loan secondary markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:19:y:2019:i:9:p:1569-1577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.