IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v42y2022i6p388-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk disclosure practices: Does institutional imperative matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Istiaq Azim
  • Shamsun Nahar

Abstract

This article will help government managers, regulators, and standard setters to improve risk management and disclosure in emerging economies. Evidence from in-depth interviews will guide government-owned banks in Bangladesh to effectively manage and voluntarily disclose risk management practices. The authors argue that legitimization might be a strategy for government-owned banks in pursuing to survive in the finance industry.ABSTRACTGovernment-owned banks in emerging economies commonly suffer from a lack of good governance, non-performing loans, undetected money laundering and other management malpractices. Managing and disclosing risks are significant issues for managers of government-owned banks. This article explores the managerial perception of risk disclosure by these government banks. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 35 executives from government banks, government regulatory, and monitoring authorities. Institutional pressure, along with risk committees and board independence, are critical contributing factors for risk disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Istiaq Azim & Shamsun Nahar, 2022. "Risk disclosure practices: Does institutional imperative matter?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 388-394, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:42:y:2022:i:6:p:388-394
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1994736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2021.1994736
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2021.1994736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:42:y:2022:i:6:p:388-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.