IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v41y2021i7p516-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender budgeting in the crossroad of gender policy and public financial management: The Finnish case

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Elomäki
  • Hanna Ylöstalo

Abstract

Finland has been using gender budgets (GB) for over 10 years; however, very little is known internationally about the Finnish GB experience. Finland’s experience provides several lessons for GB practitioners in other countries. It highlights the importance of clear national gender equality goals for effective GB implementation, as well as the need to pay attention to mid-term fiscal frameworks. It also shows how the lack of feminist economic expertise and a clear conceptual framework can reduce GB to technical processes and calculations, and the importance of outside-government actors drawing attention to the gendered impacts of economic policies.ABSTRACTThe paper analyses the implementation of gender budgeting (GB) in Finland. It contributes to GB literature through shedding light on the dynamics of politicization and depoliticization in GB implementation, as well as the complex position of GB between gender equality policy and public financial management. The paper provides new insights on what the shift towards mid-term budgetary frameworks means for GB, which to date have been missing from the GB literature. It also addresses the relationship of gender mainstreaming and GB, as well as the role of civil society in re-politicizing GB through drawing attention to the impacts of economic policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Elomäki & Hanna Ylöstalo, 2021. "Gender budgeting in the crossroad of gender policy and public financial management: The Finnish case," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 516-526, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:41:y:2021:i:7:p:516-526
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1927528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2021.1927528
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2021.1927528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:41:y:2021:i:7:p:516-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.