IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v39y2019i8p571-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sub-sovereign bond buyback: a way forward for debt-laden regions in austerity

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Eltrudis
  • Stephen J. Bailey
  • Patrizio Monfardini

Abstract

Previous academic literature has criticised bond buyback as a ‘”boondoggle” benefiting a country’s creditors’—meaning that buybacks are a wasteful use of public money. This paper challenges the narrow financial–economic perspective behind that statement by adopting a broader socio-political framework that includes the potential benefits of buyback for citizens, not just financial market costs. In particular, buyback does not necessarily require a budget surplus via higher local taxes and/or increased austerity measures.Although debt brake and balanced budget rules strengthened limits established in the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), transitional periods allowed local governments to deviate from them. Thereafter, local government directors of finance will be faced with the growing presence of financial derivatives in public accounts and the development of sub-sovereign fiscal decentralization, both of which are affecting debt management. This paper shows how EU fiscal rules may legitimize bond buyback in the current fiscal austerity context. Both financial stability and compliance with the SGP could be addressed by adopting policies aligned towards using innovative financial accounting engineering solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Eltrudis & Stephen J. Bailey & Patrizio Monfardini, 2019. "Sub-sovereign bond buyback: a way forward for debt-laden regions in austerity," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 571-580, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:39:y:2019:i:8:p:571-580
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1611225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2019.1611225
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2019.1611225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Eltrudis & Patrizio Monfardini, 2020. "Are Central Government Rules Okay? Assessing the Hidden Costs of Centralised Discipline for Municipal Borrowing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:39:y:2019:i:8:p:571-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.