IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v17y2015i4p543-564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient and Public Participation in the English NHS: An assessment of experimental implementation processes

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluca Veronesi
  • Kevin Keasey

Abstract

This article analyses the impact of the implementation of a set of policies introduced after 1997 in the English National Health Service aimed at increasing patient and public involvement in organizational decision-making processes. Adopting the ambiguity/conflict policy implementation model and based on a year-long research project, it shows that patient and public engagement can be more effectively achieved when there is room for interpretation and discretion in selecting the means for involvement. Local initiatives, based on effective leadership governance mechanisms and organizational learning processes, are more likely to generate inclusiveness, shared ownership, and user-centredness than a top-down framework for involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluca Veronesi & Kevin Keasey, 2015. "Patient and Public Participation in the English NHS: An assessment of experimental implementation processes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 543-564, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:17:y:2015:i:4:p:543-564
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.822526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2013.822526
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2013.822526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Landry Signé, 2017. "Policy Implementation – A synthesis of the Study of Policy Implementation and the Causes of Policy Failure," Research papers & Policy papers 1703, Policy Center for the New South.
    2. Amal Marzouki & Sehl Mellouli & Sylvie Daniel, 2022. "The Identification of Stakeholders’ Living Contexts in Stakeholder Participation Data: A Semantic, Spatial and Temporal Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Landry Signé, 2017. "Public service delivery – What matters for successful implementation and what can policy leaders do?," Research papers & Policy papers 1705, Policy Center for the New South.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:17:y:2015:i:4:p:543-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.