IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v12y2010i1p53-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Analysis of Stakeholder Identification in Municipal Districts

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Gomes
  • Joyce Liddle
  • Luciana de Oliveira Miranda Gomes

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present an empirical, descriptive contribution to the literature on stakeholder management in the area of local government decision making. The research presented here examines the web of interactions, inter-connections and influences on local government authorities in Brazil and England. It provides a cross-cultural survey of Brazilian and English municipal districts with data being analysed using statistical techniques (Chi-squared is calculated to test for goodness of fit and Cronbach's alpha to test reliability). The paper identifies two stakeholder lists for the countries under investigation, and concludes that, despite cultural differences between Brazil and England, there is convergence in the way local government managers identify stakeholders. The empirical evidence provided here supports the hypothesis that stakeholder identification is very likely to be seen as a universal phenomenon. A comprehensive review of the extant literature revealed that this research constitutes the very first cross-cultural investigation that has focused on stakeholder identification in the local government domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Gomes & Joyce Liddle & Luciana de Oliveira Miranda Gomes, 2010. "Cross-Cultural Analysis of Stakeholder Identification in Municipal Districts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 53-75, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:12:y:2010:i:1:p:53-75
    DOI: 10.1080/14719030902800218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030902800218
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719030902800218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:12:y:2010:i:1:p:53-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.