IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v6y2018i1p1493666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing government spending efficiency and explaining inefficiency scores: DEA-bootstrap analysis in the case of Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Nejib Ouertani
  • Nader Naifar
  • Hedi Ben Haddad

Abstract

The recent Saudi Arabia’s “Vision 2030” including the National Transformation Plan has renewed the debate on the efficiency of government spending. The aim of this paper was twofold. First, to measure the relative efficiency of Saudi Arabia’s public spending over the period 1988–2013 using non-parametric approach. Second, to explain the inefficiency scores using a DEA-Bootstrap analysis by incorporating environmental variables. The empirical results show that, on average, the public spending is inefficient, implying that Saudi Arabia can improve their performance on health, education and infrastructure without increasing spending. The empirical explanation of the inefficiency scores using a DEA-Bootstrap analysis shows that the unemployment and broad money negatively impact government expenditure mainly in the case of infrastructure and health. Our findings can be useful for policymakers in order to set out a structural adjustment plan to improve the efficiency level for education, health and infrastructure expenditures.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Nejib Ouertani & Nader Naifar & Hedi Ben Haddad, 2018. "Assessing government spending efficiency and explaining inefficiency scores: DEA-bootstrap analysis in the case of Saudi Arabia," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1493666-149, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1493666
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2018.1493666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2018.1493666
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2018.1493666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Cheick Camara, 2023. "Gender Budgeting and Health Spending Efficiency in Indian States: A Staggered Difference-in-Differences Analysis," CERDI Working papers hal-04294262, HAL.
    3. Abiodun Adegboye & Olawale Daniel Akinyele, 2022. "Assessing the determinants of government spending efficiency in Africa," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Anup Kumar Yadava & Yadawananda Neog, 2022. "Public Sector Performance and Efficiency Assessment of Indian States," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 493-511, April.
    5. Martina Halaskova & Renata Halaskova & Viktor Prokop, 2018. "Evaluation of Efficiency in Selected Areas of Public Services in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Gergana Mihaylova-Borisova & Presiana Nenkova, 2021. "DEA Efficiency Approach in Comparing Macroeconomic Performance of EU and Balkan Countries," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 42-62.
    7. Bowen Sun & Haibo Wang & Jaime Ortiz & Jun Huang & Can Zhao & Zelang Wang, 2022. "A Decomposed Data Analysis Approach to Assessing City Sustainable Development Performance: A Network DEA Model with a Slack-Based Measure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Alliou S. Diarrassouba, 2021. "Inefficiency Factors in Basic Health Care Supply in Côte d’Ivoire: A Comparative Econometric Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 1-46, June.
    9. Marius Sorin Dincă & Gheorghiţa Dincă & Maria Letiţia Andronic & Anna Maria Pasztori, 2021. "Assessment of the European Union’s Educational Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Zhen Liu & Trong Lam Vu & Thi Thu Hien Phan & Thanh Quang Ngo & Nguyen Ho Viet Anh & Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra, 2022. "Financial inclusion and green economic performance for energy efficiency finance," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2359-2389, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1493666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.