IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v17y2014i9p1161-1182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk governance for infectious diseases: exploring the feasibility and added value of the IRGC-framework for Dutch infectious disease control

Author

Listed:
  • J.C.M. Roodenrijs
  • M.M. Kraaij-Dirkzwager
  • J.H.T.C. van den Kerkhof
  • H.A.C. Runhaar

Abstract

The quality of the Dutch system for control of infectious diseases is considered to be high. However, sometimes (e.g. during the Mexican flu and HPV vaccination in 2009, during the Q-fever outbreak from 2008 to 2011) the system encounters problems in terms of perceived effectiveness and public acceptance. This raises the question: Are other governance arrangements available that could contribute to a higher effectiveness and acceptance of infectious disease control? If so, how feasible are these arrangements in the light of the high time pressure in the case of an emergent outbreak of infectious diseases? In this paper, we explore the feasibility and added value of the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC)-framework. This framework aims to improve risk governance by tailoring the risk governance approach to the specific characteristics of the risk (the IRGC distinguishes between simple, complex, uncertain and ambiguous risks). Two recent infectious disease episodes - Q-fever and Schmallenberg virus (SBV) - were analysed. The actual risk governance approach was compared with a hypothesized situation, in which the IRGC-framework would have been applied. Data were collected by means of a review of literature, policy documents, newspaper articles and interviews with risk assessors and risk managers. This exploratory study revealed that Dutch infectious disease control incorporates many elements of the IRGC-approach, although some of these elements are used in an intuitive rather than in an explicit manner. Few elements are lacking. Incorporation of these elements (e.g. concern assessment) would have been both feasible and useful during the Q-fever epidemic (ambiguous risk), but not during the SBV outbreak (uncertain risk). We expect that primarily in cases of ambiguous infectious disease risks an explicit risk characterization and the further incorporation of concern assessment could strengthen Dutch infectious disease control. To assess whether a risk is (becoming) ambiguous remains a challenge to be operationalized.

Suggested Citation

  • J.C.M. Roodenrijs & M.M. Kraaij-Dirkzwager & J.H.T.C. van den Kerkhof & H.A.C. Runhaar, 2014. "Risk governance for infectious diseases: exploring the feasibility and added value of the IRGC-framework for Dutch infectious disease control," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1161-1182, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:9:p:1161-1182
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2013.875935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2013.875935
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2013.875935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Åsa Boholm & Hervé Corvellec & Marianne Karlsson, 2012. "The practice of risk governance: lessons from the field," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2009. "On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huizer, Yvonne L. & Kraaij-Dirkzwager, Marleen M. & Timen, Aura & Schuitmaker, Tjerk Jan & Steenbergen, Jim E. van, 2015. "Context analysis for epidemic control in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 66-73.
    2. Donald Macrae, 2016. "Managing a political crisis after a disaster: how concern assessment can address the political aspects involved in framing a solution," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 1036-1042, September.
    3. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2021. "Risk as an Approach to Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    4. Marleen Kraaij-Dirkzwager & Joost Van der Ree & Erik Lebret, 2017. "Rapid Assessment of Stakeholder Concerns about Public Health. An Introduction to a Fast and Inexpensive Approach Applied on Health Concerns about Intensive Animal Production Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dengsheng Wu & Xiaoqian Zhu & Jie Wan & Chunbing Bao & Jianping Li, 2019. "A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting Risk Response Strategies of Software Project: From the Perspective of Risk Correlations," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 339-364, January.
    2. Aven, Terje, 2010. "Some reflections on uncertainty analysis and management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 195-201.
    3. Niël Almero Krüger & Natanya Meyer, 2021. "The Development of a Small and Medium-Sized Business Risk Management Intervention Tool," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Neelke Doorn, 2015. "The Blind Spot in Risk Ethics: Managing Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 354-360, March.
    5. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Bjerga, Torbjørn & Aven, Terje, 2015. "Adaptive risk management using new risk perspectives – an example from the oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 75-82.
    7. Aven, Terje, 2013. "A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 30-36.
    8. Terje Aven & Ortwin Renn, 2015. "An Evaluation of the Treatment of Risk and Uncertainties in the IPCC Reports on Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 701-712, April.
    9. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Shi, Wenming, 2019. "A quantitative risk analysis model with integrated deliberative Delphi platform for container shipping operational risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 203-227.
    10. Kemp, Deanna & Worden, Sandy & Owen, John R., 2016. "Differentiated social risk: Rebound dynamics and sustainability performance in mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 19-26.
    11. Per Becker, 2017. "Dark Side of Development: Modernity, Disaster Risk and Sustainable Livelihoods in Two Coastal Communities in Fiji," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Pengyun Chong & Hui Yin & Chaofeng Wang & Pengcheng Wang & Linqing Li & Di Wu & Jingwei Li & Dong Ding, 2022. "Evaluation of Social Stability Risk of Adjusting Goods Vehicle Calculation Method Based on Optimal Combination Weighting—Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.
    14. Nikolai Mouraviev & Nada K. Kakabadse, 2014. "Risk allocation in a public-private partnership: a case study of construction and operation of kindergartens in Kazakhstan," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 621-640, May.
    15. Peng Hou & Xiaojian Yi & Haiping Dong, 2020. "A Spatial Statistic Based Risk Assessment Approach to Prioritize the Pipeline Inspection of the Pipeline Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Terje Aven, 2012. "Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1647-1656, October.
    17. Junxia Miao & Dechun Huang & Zhengqi He, 2019. "Social Risk Assessment and Management for Major Construction Projects in China Based on Fuzzy Integrated Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-17, November.
    18. Grzegorz Drozdowski & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Jacek Stasiak, 2021. "The Empirical Analysis of the Core Competencies of the Company’s Resource Management Risk. Preliminary Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin de Jong & Andreas Klinke, 2021. "Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-532, March.
    20. Ching-Chung Lin & Shou-Lin Yang & Huai-I Lee, 2015. "Bank Concentration and Enterprise Borrowing Cost Risk: Evidence from Asian Markets," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(2), pages 194-201, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:17:y:2014:i:9:p:1161-1182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.