IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v39y2012i4p913-922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autoregressive model selection based on a prediction perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yun-Huan Lee
  • Chun-Shu Chen

Abstract

The autoregressive (AR) model is a popular method for fitting and prediction in analyzing time-dependent data, where selecting an accurate model among considered orders is a crucial issue. Two commonly used selection criteria are the Akaike information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion. However, the two criteria are known to suffer potential problems regarding overfit and underfit, respectively. Therefore, using them would perform well in some situations, but poorly in others. In this paper, we propose a new criterion in terms of the prediction perspective based on the concept of generalized degrees of freedom for AR model selection. We derive an approximately unbiased estimator of mean-squared prediction errors based on a data perturbation technique for selecting the order parameter, where the estimation uncertainty involved in a modeling procedure is considered. Some numerical experiments are performed to illustrate the superiority of the proposed method over some commonly used order selection criteria. Finally, the methodology is applied to a real data example to predict the weekly rate of return on the stock price of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and the results indicate that the proposed method is satisfactory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun-Huan Lee & Chun-Shu Chen, 2012. "Autoregressive model selection based on a prediction perspective," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 913-922, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:913-922
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2011.636418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2011.636418
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2011.636418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradley Efron, 2004. "The Estimation of Prediction Error: Covariance Penalties and Cross-Validation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 619-632, January.
    2. Huang, Hsin-Cheng & Chen, Chun-Shu, 2007. "Optimal Geostatistical Model Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1009-1024, September.
    3. Peide Shi & Chih‐Ling Tsai, 2004. "A Joint Regression Variable and Autoregressive Order Selection Criterion," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 923-941, November.
    4. Ruiz, Esther, 1994. "Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic volatility models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 289-306, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Bradley & Noel Cressie & Tao Shi, 2015. "Comparing and selecting spatial predictors using local criteria," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Chen, Yin-Ping & Huang, Hsin-Cheng & Tu, I-Ping, 2010. "A new approach for selecting the number of factors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 2990-2998, December.
    3. Qingying Zong & Jonathan R. Bradley, 2023. "Criterion constrained Bayesian hierarchical models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 294-320, March.
    4. Theo Dijkstra, 2014. "Ridge regression and its degrees of freedom," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3185-3193, November.
    5. Motta, Anderson C. O. & Hotta, Luiz K., 2003. "Exact Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Estimation of the Stochastic Volatility Model," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 23(2), November.
    6. Sieds, 2012. "Complete Volume LXVI n.1 2012," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 66(1), pages 1-296.
    7. Benjamin Favetto & Adeline Samson, 2010. "Parameter Estimation for a Bidimensional Partially Observed Ornstein–Uhlenbeck Process with Biological Application," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 200-220, June.
    8. Ghysels, E. & Harvey, A. & Renault, E., 1995. "Stochastic Volatility," Papers 95.400, Toulouse - GREMAQ.
    9. Preminger, Arie & Storti, Giuseppe, 2014. "Least squares estimation for GARCH (1,1) model with heavy tailed errors," MPRA Paper 59082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Shaw, Charles, 2018. "Regime-Switching And Levy Jump Dynamics In Option-Adjusted Spreads," MPRA Paper 94154, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 May 2019.
    11. Girard, Didier A., 2020. "Asymptotic near-efficiency of the “Gibbs-energy (GE) and empirical-variance” estimating functions for fitting Matérn models - II: Accounting for measurement errors via “conditional GE mean”," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    12. Lux, Thomas & Morales-Arias, Leonardo & Sattarhoff, Cristina, 2011. "A Markov-switching multifractal approach to forecasting realized volatility," Kiel Working Papers 1737, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Daniel B. Nelson, 1994. "Asymptotically Optimal Smoothing with ARCH Models," NBER Technical Working Papers 0161, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Andersen, Torben G. & Sorensen, Bent E., 1997. "GMM and QML asymptotic standard deviations in stochastic volatility models: Comments on Ruiz (1994)," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 397-403.
    15. Tu, Anthony H. & Wang, Ming-Chun, 2007. "The innovations of e-mini contracts and futures price volatility components: The empirical investigation of S&P 500 stock index futures," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 198-211, April.
    16. Nima Nonejad, 2021. "Bayesian model averaging and the conditional volatility process: an application to predicting aggregate equity returns by conditioning on economic variables," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1387-1411, August.
    17. Stefano Marchetti & Maciej Beręsewicz & Nicola Salvati & Marcin Szymkowiak & Łukasz Wawrowski, 2018. "The use of a three‐level M‐quantile model to map poverty at local administrative unit 1 in Poland," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1077-1104, October.
    18. Aerambamoorthy Thavaneswaran & Nalini Ravishanker & You Liang, 2015. "Generalized duration models and optimal estimation using estimating functions," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(1), pages 129-156, February.
    19. Hettihewa, Samanthala & Saha, Shrabani & Zhang, Hanxiong, 2018. "Does an aging population influence stock markets? Evidence from New Zealand," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 142-158.
    20. Andersen, Torben G & Sorensen, Bent E, 1996. "GMM Estimation of a Stochastic Volatility Model: A Monte Carlo Study," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 328-352, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:913-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.