IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gnstxx/v25y2013i3p665-677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiently estimating the error distribution in nonparametric regression with responses missing at random

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Chown
  • Ursula U. Müller

Abstract

This article considers nonparametric regression models with multivariate covariates and with responses missing at random. We estimate the regression function with a local polynomial smoother. The residual-based empirical distribution function that only uses complete cases, i.e. residuals that can actually be constructed from the data, is shown to be efficient in the sense of Hájek and Le Cam. In the proofs we derive, more generally, the efficient influence function for estimating an arbitrary linear functional of the error distribution; this covers the distribution function as a special case. We also show that the complete case residual-based empirical distribution function admits a functional central limit theorem. This is done by applying the transfer principle for complete case statistics developed by Koul et al. [(2012), 'The Transfer Principle: a Tool for Complete Case Analysis', Annals of Statistics , 40, 3031-3049], which makes it possible to adapt known results for fully observed data to the missing data case. The article concludes with a small simulation study investigating the performance of the complete case residual-based empirical distribution function.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Chown & Ursula U. Müller, 2013. "Efficiently estimating the error distribution in nonparametric regression with responses missing at random," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 665-677, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:25:y:2013:i:3:p:665-677
    DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2013.795222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485252.2013.795222
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10485252.2013.795222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Efromovich, Sam, 2011. "Nonparametric Regression With Predictors Missing at Random," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 306-319.
    2. Hua Liang & Suojin Wang & Raymond J. Carroll, 2007. "Partially linear models with missing response variables and error-prone covariates," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 185-198.
    3. Müller Ursula U. & Schick Anton & Wefelmeyer Wolfgang, 2007. "Estimating the error distribution function in semiparametric regression," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1/2007), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Model checking for parametric regressions with response missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(2), pages 229-259, April.
    2. Chown, Justin, 2016. "Efficient estimation of the error distribution function in heteroskedastic nonparametric regression with missing data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 31-39.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nengxiang Ling & Rui Kan & Philippe Vieu & Shuyu Meng, 2019. "Semi-functional partially linear regression model with responses missing at random," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 39-70, January.
    2. Nengxiang Ling & Lilei Cheng & Philippe Vieu & Hui Ding, 2022. "Missing responses at random in functional single index model for time series data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 665-692, April.
    3. Salim Bouzebda & Youssouf Souddi & Fethi Madani, 2024. "Weak Convergence of the Conditional Set-Indexed Empirical Process for Missing at Random Functional Ergodic Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Sun, Zhihua & Ye, Xue & Sun, Liuquan, 2015. "Consistent test of error-in-variables partially linear model with auxiliary variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 118-131.
    5. Majid Mojirsheibani & Timothy Reese, 2017. "Kernel regression estimation for incomplete data with applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 185-209, March.
    6. Huixia Judy Wang & Leonard A. Stefanski & Zhongyi Zhu, 2012. "Corrected-loss estimation for quantile regression with covariate measurement errors," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(2), pages 405-421.
    7. Wangli Xu & Xu Guo & Lixing Zhu, 2012. "Goodness-of-fitting for partial linear model with missing response at random," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 103-118.
    8. Tang, Niansheng & Wang, Wenjun, 2019. "Robust estimation of generalized estimating equations with finite mixture correlation matrices and missing covariates at random for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 640-655.
    9. Xie Yanmei & Zhang Biao, 2017. "Empirical Likelihood in Nonignorable Covariate-Missing Data Problems," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Xue, Liugen & Xue, Dong, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for semiparametric regression model with missing response data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(4), pages 723-740, April.
    11. Wang, Qihua & Lai, Peng, 2011. "Empirical likelihood calibration estimation for the median treatment difference in observational studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1596-1609, April.
    12. Su, Haiyan & Liang, Hua, 2010. "An empirical likelihood-based method for comparison of treatment effects--Test of equality of coefficients in linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 1079-1088, April.
    13. Zhao, Haibing & You, Jinhong, 2011. "Difference based estimation for partially linear regression models with measurement errors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1321-1338, November.
    14. Lu, Xuewen, 2009. "Empirical likelihood for heteroscedastic partially linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 387-396, March.
    15. Firouzeh Noghrehchi & Jakub Stoklosa & Spiridon Penev, 2020. "Multiple imputation and functional methods in the presence of measurement error and missingness in explanatory variables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1291-1317, September.
    16. Wangli Xu & Xu Guo, 2013. "Checking the adequacy of partial linear models with missing covariates at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 473-490, June.
    17. Xiaofeng Lv & Rui Li, 2013. "Smoothed empirical likelihood analysis of partially linear quantile regression models with missing response variables," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 97(4), pages 317-347, October.
    18. Ash Abebe & Huybrechts F. Bindele & Masego Otlaadisa & Boikanyo Makubate, 2021. "Robust estimation of single index models with responses missing at random," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2195-2225, October.
    19. Jianhong Shi & Fanrong Zhao, 2018. "Statistical inference for heteroscedastic semi-varying coefficient EV models under restricted condition," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 487-511, June.
    20. Müller, Ursula U. & Schick, Anton & Wefelmeyer, Wolfgang, 2014. "Testing for additivity in partially linear regression with possibly missing responses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 51-61.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:25:y:2013:i:3:p:665-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.