IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v24y2018i15p1350-1368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does short selling improve stock price efficiency and liquidity? Evidence from a natural experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhisheng Li
  • Bingxuan Lin
  • Ting Zhang
  • Chen Chen

Abstract

China introduced short selling for designated stocks in March 2010. Using this important policy change as a natural experiment, we examine the effect of short selling on stock price efficiency and liquidity. We show that the introduction of short selling significantly improves price efficiency, as measured by the differences in individual stock responses to market returns and the delay in price adjustments. Short selling also enhances stock liquidity, as measured by bid-ask spread and Amihud [2002. ‘Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-section and Time-series Effects.’ Journal of Financial Markets 5: 31–56] illiquidity measure; and reduces stock volatility. Overall, our results suggest that short selling helps to stabilize asset prices, provides additional liquidity and improves market quality, even in an emerging economy with a less developed stock market than that in the US and Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhisheng Li & Bingxuan Lin & Ting Zhang & Chen Chen, 2018. "Does short selling improve stock price efficiency and liquidity? Evidence from a natural experiment in China," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(15), pages 1350-1368, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:24:y:2018:i:15:p:1350-1368
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2017.1307772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1307772
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1307772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dasilas, Apostolos, 2022. "The impact of margin trading and short selling on the investment-to-price sensitivity. Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Anwer, Zaheer & Mohamad, Shamsher & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2021. "Dividend payout policy of Shariah compliant firms: Evidence from United States," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Ning Hu & Siqi Lu & Tao Ma & Jianfang Ye, 2020. "Short‐selling and cost of equity: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3681-3707, December.
    4. Ye, Qing & Zhou, Shengjie & Zhang, Jie, 2020. "Short-selling, margin-trading, and stock liquidity: Evidence from the Chinese stock markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Liu, Jia & Fu, Pengju & Lin, Chunyan, 2023. "Rule improvements and irrational characteristics of herd behaviour–The effects of SMT policy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    6. Hui Ding & Xiaoran Ni & Hongmei Xu, 2021. "Short selling and labor investment efficiency: evidence from the Chinese stock market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2451-2476, April.
    7. Wan, Xiaoyuan, 2020. "The impact of short-selling and margin-buying on liquidity: Evidence from the Chinese stock market," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 104-118.
    8. Feng, Lixuan & Xiang, Cheng, 2023. "Short-selling and mutual fund herding: The Chinese evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Ali, Heba, 2019. "Does downside risk matter more in asset pricing? Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 154-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:24:y:2018:i:15:p:1350-1368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.