IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjssxx/v23y1997i1p5-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South Africa and the limits of civil society

Author

Listed:
  • Daryl Glaser

Abstract

This paper provides a critical commentary on the civil society debate conducted in sections of the South African liberation movement, especially amongst those associated with township civic associations, in the early 1990s. The first part of the paper establishes the historical context of the civil society debate, sketching the evolution of the civics and the arrival of civil society ‘talk’ in the political camp broadly aligned to the African National Congress (ANC). The larger part of the paper is an excursion into political theory. It welcomes recognition of the democratic value of an autonomous civil realm by a movement whose historical allegiances and practices are far from consistently democratic. Nevertheless, the paper calls into question some noteworthy formulations of the case for civil society made by intellectuals and activists linked to the civics, arguing that these are problematic for the projects both of creating a more socially egalitarian society and of setting in place a post‐apartheid democracy that is liberty‐protective and inclusive. The paper offers elements of an alternative way of conceptualising a normatively ideal civil society. It concludes with some brief reflections on the state of play regarding state and civil society in South Africa in the period since the 1994 free elections.

Suggested Citation

  • Daryl Glaser, 1997. "South Africa and the limits of civil society," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 5-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:23:y:1997:i:1:p:5-25
    DOI: 10.1080/03057079708708520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03057079708708520
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03057079708708520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ray Bush & Morris Szeftel, 1997. "Commentary," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(73), pages 307-310, September.
    2. Dasandi, Niheer & Erez, Lior, 2023. "The flag and the stick: Aid suspensions, human rights, and the problem of the complicit public," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjssxx:v:23:y:1997:i:1:p:5-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.