IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v69y2017i9p1401-1429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contesting Neoliberal Urbanism on the European Semi-periphery: The Right to the City Movement in Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Danijela Dolenec
  • Karin Doolan
  • Tomislav Tomašević

Abstract

This essay is a case study of the Right to the City movement in Croatia, one of the largest citizens’ struggles in the country’s recent history. Firstly, we argue that the movement managed to avoid the supposedly unavoidable Michels’s iron law of oligarchy. Outlining the movement’s trajectory in five phases, we show how it always prioritised social impact over institutional self-preservation. Secondly, we analyse movement outcomes as viewed by activists. In interviews with activists we establish features of evolving activist citizenship as well as ways in which participation in the movement influenced the forging of alliances among organisations and initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Danijela Dolenec & Karin Doolan & Tomislav Tomašević, 2017. "Contesting Neoliberal Urbanism on the European Semi-periphery: The Right to the City Movement in Croatia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(9), pages 1401-1429, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:69:y:2017:i:9:p:1401-1429
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2017.1385726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2017.1385726
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2017.1385726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margit Mayer, 2012. "Moving beyond 'Cities for People, Not for Profit'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 481-483, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danijela Dolenec & Daniela Širinić & Ana Balković, 2022. "Resisting the Great Recession: Social movement unionism in Croatia and Serbia," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(1), pages 105-121, March.
    2. Domazet, Mladen & Ančić, Branko, 2019. "Complementarity between the EJ movement and degrowth on the European semiperiphery: An empirical study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 120-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xue, Jin, 2014. "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-138.
    2. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    3. Kitchin, Rob & Cardullo, Paolo & Di Feliciantonio, Cesare, 2018. "Citizenship, Justice and the Right to the Smart City," SocArXiv b8aq5, Center for Open Science.
    4. Mee Kam Ng, 2020. "Transformative urbanism and reproblematising land scarcity in Hong Kong," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 1452-1468, May.
    5. Gülçin Erdi Lelandais, 2014. "Space and Identity in Resistance against Neoliberal Urban Planning in Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1785-1806, September.
    6. Garrett Wolf & Nathan Mahaffey, 2016. "Designing Difference: Co-Production of Spaces of Potentiality," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 59-67.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:69:y:2017:i:9:p:1401-1429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.