IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v52y2020i5p459-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Okun’s law. Theoretical and empirical considerations using fractional integration

Author

Listed:
  • Luis A. Gil-Alana
  • Marinko Skare
  • Sanja Blazevic Buric

Abstract

Full employment remains at the center of any economic policy. Following Okun’s conclusion regarding the trade-off relation between unemployment and real gross national product growth, new studies on different aspects of variable and methodological issues have brought new light to the theory. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the unemployment/GDP relationship, i.e. Okun’s Law, in order to test the basic Okun’s assumption taking into account modern economic circumstances and new methodological specifications. This study analyzes the series for 24 selected countries using fractionally integrated methods. Using these techniques, the results substantially change across countries and also depending on the specification of the error term. Unemployment and output growth rates series show some degree of long memory behavior for most countries while the stability of Okun’s coefficient is also challenged since it changes drastically. Estimated gaps are quite high, not only for −0.30 standard coefficient values but also when compared with other studies’ results. Policy makers can be assisted with these techniques in their efforts to design optimal economic policy to achieve full employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis A. Gil-Alana & Marinko Skare & Sanja Blazevic Buric, 2020. "Testing Okun’s law. Theoretical and empirical considerations using fractional integration," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 459-474, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:5:p:459-474
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1646407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2019.1646407
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2019.1646407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dritero Arifi & Hajdi Xhixha & Florin Aliu, 2023. "Testing Okun’s Law: Evidence From the Western Balkan Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    2. Porras-Arena, M. Sylvina & Martín-Román, Ángel L., 2023. "The heterogeneity of Okun's law: A metaregression analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Asma Raies, 2023. "Sustainable Employment in Developing and Emerging Countries: Testing Augmented Okun’s Law in Light of Institutional Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Porras-Arena, M. Sylvina & Martín-Román, Ángel L. & Dueñas Fernández , Diego & Llorente Heras, Raquel, 2024. "Okun’s Law: The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the temporary layoffs procedures (ERTEs) on Spanish regions," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 59, pages 105-125.
    5. M. Sylvina Porras-Arena & Mauricio A. Suárez Cal, 2021. "What’s behind Okun’s law? A multiple equation approach to the Uruguayan labour market," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 21-30, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    6. Louail Bilal & Ben Haj Hamida Hayet, 2021. "Asymmetry Relationship between Economic Growth and Unemployment Rates in the Arab countries: Application of the OKUN Law during 1960-2017," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Mehmet Demiral & Ozge Demiral & Aizhan Khoich & Aigul Maidyrova, 2020. "Empirical Links between Global Value Chains,Trade and Unemployment," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 16(4), pages 95-107.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:5:p:459-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.