IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v37y2007i1p3-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing a model of the antecedents and consequences of budgetary participation on job performance

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Chong
  • Darren Johnson

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of antecedents (such as task exceptions and task analysability) and consequences (such as job-relevant information, budget goal level, budget goal acceptance and budget goal commitment) of budgetary participation on job performance. The responses of 135 middle-level managers, drawn from a cross- section of manufacturing firms, to a survey questionnaire, were analysed by using a structural equation modelling (SEM) technique. The results of this study suggest that task exceptions and task analysability are important antecedents of budgetary participation. The results further suggest that the cognitive effect of participation in goal- setting allows subordinates to gather, exchange and share job-relevant information. The availability of job-relevant information allows subordinates to develop effective strategies or plans, which will help them to exert effort over time, in an attempt to attain their goals. The results support the proposition that setting difficult but attainable budget goals increases subordinates? budget goal level, acceptance, and commitment to the budget goal, which in turn improves job performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Chong & Darren Johnson, 2007. "Testing a model of the antecedents and consequences of budgetary participation on job performance," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 3-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:37:y:2007:i:1:p:3-19
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2007.9730055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lau, Chong M. & Martin-Sardesai, Ann V., 2012. "The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 157-172.
    2. Cadez, Simon & Guilding, Chris, 2008. "An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 836-863.
    3. Daniele Cristina Bernd & Ilse Maria Beuren & Celliane Ferraz Pazetto & Carlos Eduardo Facin Lavarda, 2022. "Antecedents of Commitment to Budgetary Goals," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(2), pages 200018-2000.
    4. Macinati, Manuela S. & Rizzo, Marco G., 2014. "Budget goal commitment, clinical managers’ use of budget information and performance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 228-238.
    5. Lau, Chong M. & Scully, Glennda & Lee, Alina, 2018. "The effects of organizational politics on employee motivations to participate in target setting and employee budgetary participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 247-259.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:37:y:2007:i:1:p:3-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.