IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v28y2004i3p237-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial reporting on the Internet by 2010: a consensus view

Author

Listed:
  • Michael John Jones
  • Jason Zezhong Xiao

Abstract

This paper reports the final results of a Delphi study into corporate financial reporting by 2010. Twenty UK experts in accounting and the Internet representing academics, auditors, regulators, reporting companies and users participated in the study. A three-dimensional conceptual framework was adopted consisting of the role of the Internet (i.e. problem solver or problem creator), the determinant of change (technological determinism, non-technological determinism or contingency perspective), and the pace of change (conservatism, gradualism or radicalism). The consensus view was that the financial reporting package would evolve into a core of general purpose, standardised information (in both the hard copy and Internet version) together with a non-core of general purpose and customised information. Radical changes suggested by prior studies such as real-time reporting and disclosure of raw data will not occur, at least to the core package. Auditors will be reactive and cautious, and regulators will adopt a minimalist approach. The fundamental dilemma of financial reporting in the Internet environment will be between standardisation and customisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael John Jones & Jason Zezhong Xiao, 2004. "Financial reporting on the Internet by 2010: a consensus view," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 237-263, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:237-263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Geyt, Debby & Van Cauwenberge, Philippe & Vander Bauwhede, Heidi, 2014. "Does high-quality corporate communication reduce insider trading profitability?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Williams, Susan P. & Scifleet, Paul A. & Hardy, Catherine A., 2006. "Online business reporting: An information management perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 91-101.
    3. Mohammed Ali Ahmed Al-Sharafi & Shu Tong & Abdullah Aloqab, 2021. "The Effective Role of Internal Factors on Reconstructing Telecom Companies: The Case of Yemen Telecom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Yousef Ali Alwardat, 2020. "Internet Financial Reporting Disclosure in the Saudi Listed Manufacturing Companies," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Dr. Mohd Noor Azli bin Ali Khan Author_Email: mnazli@yahoo.com & Prof. Dr. Noor Azizi bin Ismail, 2011. "Malaysian Academics’ Perceptions Of Internet Financial Reporting," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-024-163, Conference Master Resources.
    6. Bojan Đorđević & Mira Đorđević & Dragiša Stanujkić, 2012. "Investor Relations On The Internet: Analysis Of Companies On The Serbian Stock Market," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 57(193), pages 113-136, April- Ju.
    7. Ping Guan & Liangrong Song & Haimin Cao, 2016. "Study on Internet Investor Relations Management Evaluation of Listed Companies in China," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 121-121, February.
    8. Nirosh Kuruppu & Peter Oyelere & Hamdan Al Jabri, 2015. "Internet Financial Reporting And Disclosure Practices Of Publicly Traded Corporations: Evidence From Sri Lanka," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 75-91.
    9. Winkler, Jens & Kuklinski, Christian Paul Jian-Wei & Moser, Roger, 2015. "Decision making in emerging markets: The Delphi approach's contribution to coping with uncertainty and equivocality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1118-1126.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:237-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.