IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v23y1999i3p241-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Processing Strategy During Analytical Procedures: Where and How Auditors Focus Their Attention

Author

Listed:
  • Ed O’donnell
  • Mark Lehman

Abstract

Experienced auditors used computerized case materials to perform analytical procedures and identify audit planning concerns. Process‐racing software monitored information search patterns and provided evidence about where and how participants focused their attention. Half of the participants examined a case with seeded problems, which provided a basis for examining whether task conditions influence processing strategy. Participants focused primarily on comparative financial statement account balances and secondarily on financial ratios, which suggests that planning analytical procedures cannot be operationalized as a ratio analysis task. Participants who used a configural information processing strategy spent more time on task. Configural processing was also associated with an increase in the number of documented planning concerns, but only for the case without seeded problems. Neither case differences nor auditor experience had a direct effect on the use of a configural information processing strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ed O’donnell & Mark Lehman, 1999. "Information Processing Strategy During Analytical Procedures: Where and How Auditors Focus Their Attention," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 241-273, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:23:y:1999:i:3:p:241-273
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-6303.00014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6303.00014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crawford, Louise & Helliar, Christine & Monk, Elizabeth & Stevenson, Lorna, 2011. "SCAM: Design of a learning and teaching resource," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 61-72.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:23:y:1999:i:3:p:241-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.