IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/accfor/v35y2011i1p61-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SCAM: Design of a learning and teaching resource

Author

Listed:
  • Crawford, Louise
  • Helliar, Christine
  • Monk, Elizabeth
  • Stevenson, Lorna

Abstract

University accounting students often have to assimilate technical auditing knowledge without practical audit experience. The desire to develop an appropriate experiential opportunity motivated this research – to create an audit teaching and learning resource to simulate audit experience and facilitate the development of transferable skills. Literature findings and dedicated questionnaire survey results suggested that such a resource should: (i) use a web based case-study to simulate a real-life audit scenario; (ii) require group working of the participants; (iii) facilitate the use and development of a range of transferable skills; and (iv) encourage a consideration of the wider business context. The web-based resource SCAM (www.scam-plc.co.uk) was developed to address these aims. This paper details this development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Crawford, Louise & Helliar, Christine & Monk, Elizabeth & Stevenson, Lorna, 2011. "SCAM: Design of a learning and teaching resource," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 61-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:61-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2010.08.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998210000359
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.08.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonner, S. E. & Libby, R. & Nelson, M. W., 1997. "Audit category knowledge as a precondition to learning from experience," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 387-410, July.
    2. Julie Drake, 1999. "Instructional case: the audit of Award Rosette Manufacturers Ltd," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 363-375.
    3. Elewechi Okike, 1999. "The Coopers & Lybrand 'Excellence in Audit Education' Programme: a note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 57-65.
    4. Christopher Mabey & Paul Topham & G. Roland Kaye, 1998. "Computer-based courseware: a comparative review of the learner's experience," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 51-64.
    5. C. V. Helliar & R. Michaelson & D. M. Power & C. D. Sinclair, 2000. "Using a portfolio management game (Finesse) to teach finance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 37-51.
    6. Josephine Maltby, 2001. "Second thoughts about ' Cases in Auditing '," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 421-428.
    7. Howieson, Bryan, 2003. "Accounting practice in the new millennium: is accounting education ready to meet the challenge?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 69-103.
    8. Ed O’donnell & Mark Lehman, 1999. "Information Processing Strategy During Analytical Procedures: Where and How Auditors Focus Their Attention," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 241-273, September.
    9. PatriciaCourt Mc Larres & George Radcliffe, 2000. "Computer-based instruction in a professionally-accredited undergraduate tax course," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 243-257.
    10. Carlin Dowling & Jayne Godfrey & Nikole Gyles, 2003. "Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students' learning outcomes?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 373-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    3. Duff, Angus & Mladenovic, Rosina, 2015. "Antecedents and consequences of accounting students' approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 321-338.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Slack & Jan Loughran & Kirsty Abrahams, 2014. "Corporate Associate Partnerships: Practitioners' Involvement in the Delivery of an Auditing Course Based on a Case-Study: A Teaching Resource," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 262-276, June.
    2. Chiang, Christina & Wells, Paul K. & Xu, Gina, 2021. "How does experiential learning encourage active learning in auditing education?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Elizabeth Gammie & Bob Gammie & Fiona Duncan, 2001. "The development, implementation and operation of an undergraduate distance learning module in auditing: a teaching note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 403-412.
    4. Celik, Orhan & Ecer, Alaattin, 2009. "Efficiency in accounting education: evidence from Turkish Universities," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 614-634.
    5. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    6. Bernadette Smith & William Maguire & Helen Haijuan Han, 2018. "Generic skills in accounting: perspectives of Chinese postgraduate students," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 535-559, June.
    7. R K Tailor & Ashoka M L & Parameshwara & Abhishek N, 2020. "Suitability of accounting education to current market," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 11(2), pages 14-23, May.
    8. Christopher Humphrey, 2005. "'In the aftermath of crisis: Reflections on the principles, values and significance of academic inquiry in accounting': Introduction," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 341-351.
    9. Dunn, Cheryl L. & Gerard, Gregory J. & Grabski, Severin V., 2017. "The combined effects of user schemas and degree of cognitive fit on data retrieval performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 46-67.
    10. Arnold, Vicky & Collier, Philip A. & Leech, Stewart A. & Rose, Jacob M. & Sutton, Steve G., 2023. "Can knowledge based systems be designed to counteract deskilling effects?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    11. Nia Love & Nadine Fry, 2006. "Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 151-166.
    12. Albu Nadia & Albu Catalin & Garbina Madalina, 2012. "IMPROVING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN EMERGING ECONOMIES -AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLICATIONS ON THE ACCOUNTANTSâ€(tm) ROLES AND COMPETENCIES," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 846-852, July.
    13. Christina Chiang & Paul K. Wells & Peter Fieger & Divesh S. Sharma, 2021. "An investigation into student satisfaction, approaches to learning and the learning context in Auditing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 913-936, March.
    14. Phil Hancock & Bryan Howieson & Marie Kavanagh & Jenny Kent & Irene Tempone & Naomi Segal & Mark Freeman, 2009. "The Roles of Some Key Stakeholders in the Future of Accounting Education in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(3), pages 249-260, September.
    15. Tracey McDowall & Beverley Jackling, 2010. "Attitudes towards the accounting profession: an Australian perspective," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 30-49, May.
    16. Moll, Jodie & Yigitbasioglu, Ogan, 2019. "The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    17. Lee D. Parker, 2007. "Professionalisation and UK Accounting Education: Academic and Professional Complicity - A Commentary on 'Professionalizing Claims and the State of UK Professional Accounting Education: Some Evidence'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 43-46.
    18. Gammie, Elizabeth & Kirkham, Linda, 2008. "Breaking the link with a university education in the creation of a chartered accountant: The ICAS story," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 356-375.
    19. Watty, Kim & McKay, Jade & Ngo, Leanne, 2016. "Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-15.
    20. Mouhcine Tallaki & Enrico Bracci & Monia Castellini, 2015. "Accounting learning preferences: the role of visualisation," Working Papers 2015094, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:accfor:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:61-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/accounting-forum .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.