IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/stecon/v7y2018i3f7_3_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method for clustering panel data based on parameter homogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Romero-Padilla

Abstract

Panel data models assume that parameters are common to each subject, that assumption is not satisfied in many cases. The slope heterogeneity problem may be solved by obtaining groups where the slope parameters are heterogeneous across groups but homogeneous within groups, followed by panel data theory within each group. In this paper, an algorithm to determine clusters of subjects is discussed; the clustering is achieved by checking whether confidence intervals from different subjects overlap or not. The number of groups is determined based on the data variability. The clusters are useful by themselves to analyze the similar behavior of subjects. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to examine the properties of the methodology considered. Finally, clusters of countries with similar GDP per capita trend were obtained. Mathematics Subject Classification: 62F03, 62F25, 62H30, 91G70Keywords: Panel data models, Clustering of subjects, Parameter homogeneity test, Confidence intervals

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Romero-Padilla, 2018. "A method for clustering panel data based on parameter homogeneity," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 1-3.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:stecon:v:7:y:2018:i:3:f:7_3_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JSEM%2fVol%207_3_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoogstrate, Andre J & Palm, Franz C & Pfann, Gerard A, 2000. "Pooling in Dynamic Panel-Data Models: An Application to Forecasting GDP Growth Rates," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 18(3), pages 274-283, July.
    2. Liangjun Su & Zhentao Shi & Peter C. B. Phillips, 2016. "Identifying Latent Structures in Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 2215-2264, November.
    3. Durlauf, Steven N. & Kourtellos, Andros & Minkin, Artur, 2001. "The local Solow growth model," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4-6), pages 928-940, May.
    4. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    5. Blomquist, Johan & Westerlund, Joakim, 2013. "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels with serial correlation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 374-378.
    6. Croissant, Yves & Millo, Giovanni, 2008. "Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i02).
    7. Fruhwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia & Kaufmann, Sylvia, 2008. "Model-Based Clustering of Multiple Time Series," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 78-89, January.
    8. Su, Liangjun & Chen, Qihui, 2013. "Testing Homogeneity In Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 1079-1135, December.
    9. Croissant, Yves & Millo, Giovanni, 2008. "Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i02).
    10. World Bank, 2017. "World Development Indicators 2017," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 26447, December.
    11. Lin Chang-Ching & Ng Serena, 2012. "Estimation of Panel Data Models with Parameter Heterogeneity when Group Membership is Unknown," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Okui, Ryo & Wang, Wendun, 2021. "Heterogeneous structural breaks in panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 447-473.
    2. Hasse, Jean-Baptiste & Lajaunie, Quentin, 2022. "Does the yield curve signal recessions? New evidence from an international panel data analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-22.
    3. Saptorshee Kanto Chakraborty & Massimiliano Mazzanti, 2021. "Revisiting the literature on the dynamic Environmental Kuznets Curves using a latent structure approach," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(3), pages 923-941, October.
    4. Mehrabani, Ali, 2023. "Estimation and identification of latent group structures in panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1464-1482.
    5. Lu, Xun & Su, Liangjun, 2023. "Uniform inference in linear panel data models with two-dimensional heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 694-719.
    6. Eduardo Correia & Rodrigo Calili & José Francisco Pessanha & Maria Fatima Almeida, 2023. "Definition of Regulatory Targets for Electricity Non-Technical Losses: Proposition of an Automatic Model-Selection Technique for Panel Data Regressions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Yiren Wang & Liangjun Su & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "Low-rank Panel Quantile Regression: Estimation and Inference," Papers 2210.11062, arXiv.org.
    8. Miomir Jovanović & Ljiljana Kašćelan & Aleksandra Despotović & Vladimir Kašćelan, 2015. "The Impact of Agro-Economic Factors on GHG Emissions: Evidence from European Developing and Advanced Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Miao, Ke & Su, Liangjun & Wang, Wendun, 2020. "Panel threshold regressions with latent group structures," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 451-481.
    10. Mattia Guidi, 2015. "The Impact of Independence on Regulatory Outcomes: the Case of EU Competition Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1195-1213, November.
    11. Elena Toader & Bogdan Narcis Firtescu & Angela Roman & Sorin Gabriel Anton, 2018. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology Infrastructure on Economic Growth: An Empirical Assessment for the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Wang, Wuyi & Su, Liangjun, 2021. "Identifying latent group structures in nonlinear panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 272-295.
    13. Jiti Gao & Kai Xia, 2017. "Heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectional dependence," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 16/17, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    14. F. Di Lascio & Simone Giannerini & Antonello Scorcu & Guido Candela, 2011. "Cultural tourism and temporary art exhibitions in Italy: a panel data analysis," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 20(4), pages 519-542, November.
    15. Gao, Jiti & Xia, Kai & Zhu, Huanjun, 2020. "Heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectional dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 329-353.
    16. Zhang, Yingying & Wang, Huixia Judy & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2019. "Quantile-regression-based clustering for panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 54-67.
    17. Hasan Engin Duran & Pawe³ Gajewski, 2023. "State-level Taylor rule and monetary policy stress," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 89-120, March.
    18. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    19. Levent Kutlu & Robin C. Sickles & Mike G. Tsionas & Emmanuel Mamatzakis, 2022. "Heterogeneous decision-making and market power: an application to Eurozone banks," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 3061-3092, December.
    20. Paul Kabaila & Rheanna Mainzer & Davide Farchione, 2017. "Conditional assessment of the impact of a Hausman pretest on confidence intervals," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(4), pages 240-262, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:stecon:v:7:y:2018:i:3:f:7_3_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.