IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v101y2021i4d10.1007_s10273-021-2895-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corona-Impfstoffe im Überfluss — was dann?
[Coronavirus Vaccines in Abundance — What Then?]

Author

Listed:
  • Dieter Cassel

    (Universität Duisburg-Essen)

  • Volker Ulrich

    (Universität Bayreuth)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Seit Beginn der Corona-Impfkampagne in Deutschland am 27. Dezember 2020 waren knapp drei Monate später 10,5 Mio. Dosen verimpft. Das waren durchschnittlich 126.000 Dosen pro Tag mit steigender Tendenz: Am 15. März 2021 waren es schon mehr als 250.000 täglich. Damit konnten aber erst 3,2 Mio. Personen vollständig immunisiert werden. Um Herdenimmunität zu erreichen, die wegen der hoch infektiösen Mutanten eine Immunisierungsquote der Bevölkerung von etwa 80 % erfordern dürfte, müssten aber gut 65 Mio. Personen mit 130 Mio. Dosen geimpft sein. Beim jetzigen Impftempo würde es noch bis in den Sommer 2022 dauern, um das Immunitätsziel zu erreichen. Kommt es nach dem Impfstoffmangel bald zu einer Knappheit der Impfkapazitäten? Könnte die Herdenimmunität an mangelnder Impfbereitschaft scheitern?

Suggested Citation

  • Dieter Cassel & Volker Ulrich, 2021. "Corona-Impfstoffe im Überfluss — was dann? [Coronavirus Vaccines in Abundance — What Then?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 276-283, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:101:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10273-021-2895-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-021-2895-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-021-2895-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-021-2895-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Wein, 2021. "Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? [Is Mandatory Vaccination Against the Coronavirus Necessary?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 114-120, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahlers, Elke & Lübker, Malte, 2021. "Corona-Schnelltests am Arbeitsplatz: Einblicke aus der WSI-Lohnspiegel-Datenbank," WSI Policy Briefs 56, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Kuchinke, Björn A., 2021. "Impfstoffmärkte, COVID-19 und gesundheitspolitische Maßnahmen: Ordnungsökonomische Anmerkungen," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 152, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    3. Ratchford, Brian & Soysal, Gonca & Zentner, Alejandro & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Online and offline retailing: What we know and directions for future research," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 152-177.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:101:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10273-021-2895-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.