IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v29y2020i2d10.1007_s11749-019-00660-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria-based optimal life-testing plans under hybrid censoring scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Ritwik Bhattacharya

    (Tecnológico de Monterrey
    Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT))

  • Baidya Nath Saha

    (Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT))

  • Graceila González Farías

    (Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT))

  • Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan

    (McMaster University)

Abstract

In designing an optimal life-testing experiment under censoring setup, the design parameters are usually chosen by optimizing a suitable criterion function. The criterion function is chosen by using either a variance-based or a cost-based model, and sometimes a combination of both these factors. However, it is an optimization problem with a single objective function. In this article, a multi-criteria-based optimization problem is considered in the context of hybrid censored life-testing experiment. Both the variance and the cost factors are optimized simultaneously. The exact distribution of the maximum likelihood estimate of the lifetime model parameter is used to construct the optimality criteria. All the proposed methods are illustrated through numerical examples. One dataset is finally analyzed for real-life applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ritwik Bhattacharya & Baidya Nath Saha & Graceila González Farías & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2020. "Multi-criteria-based optimal life-testing plans under hybrid censoring scheme," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 430-453, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:29:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11749-019-00660-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-019-00660-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11749-019-00660-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-019-00660-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritwik Bhattacharya & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2017. "Computation of optimum Type-II progressively hybrid censoring schemes using variable neighborhood search algorithm," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 802-821, December.
    2. Bhattacharya, Ritwik & Pradhan, Biswabrata & Dewanji, Anup, 2015. "Computation of optimum reliability acceptance sampling plans in presence of hybrid censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 91-100.
    3. Nader Ebrahimi, 1988. "Determining the sample size for a hybrid life test based on the cost function," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 63-72, February.
    4. Yao Zhang & William Q. Meeker, 2005. "Bayesian life test planning for the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 237-249, June.
    5. R. Bhattacharya & B. Pradhan & A. Dewanji, 2014. "Optimum life testing plans in presence of hybrid censoring: A cost function approach," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 519-528, September.
    6. Balakrishnan, N. & Kundu, Debasis, 2013. "Hybrid censoring: Models, inferential results and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 166-209.
    7. Balakrishnan, N. & Burkschat, Marco & Cramer, Erhard & Hofmann, Glenn, 2008. "Fisher information based progressive censoring plans," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 366-380, December.
    8. A. Childs & B. Chandrasekar & N. Balakrishnan & D. Kundu, 2003. "Exact likelihood inference based on Type-I and Type-II hybrid censored samples from the exponential distribution," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 55(2), pages 319-330, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mao Song & Liu Bin & Shi Yimin, 2021. "Statistical Inference for a Simple Step Stress Model with Competing Risks Based on Generalized Type-I Hybrid Censoring," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(5), pages 533-548, October.
    2. Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Ritwik Bhattacharya, 2022. "Revisiting Best Linear Unbiased Estimation of Location-Scale Parameters Based on Optimally Selected Order Statistics Using Compound Design," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1891-1915, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ritwik Bhattacharya, 2020. "Implementation of compound optimal design strategy in censored life-testing experiment," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 1029-1050, December.
    2. Ritwik Bhattacharya & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2017. "Computation of optimum Type-II progressively hybrid censoring schemes using variable neighborhood search algorithm," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 802-821, December.
    3. Tanmay Sen & Yogesh Mani Tripathi & Ritwik Bhattacharya, 2018. "Statistical Inference and Optimum Life Testing Plans Under Type-II Hybrid Censoring Scheme," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 679-708, December.
    4. Bhattacharya, Ritwik & Pradhan, Biswabrata & Dewanji, Anup, 2015. "Computation of optimum reliability acceptance sampling plans in presence of hybrid censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 91-100.
    5. Jimut Bahan Chakrabarty & Shovan Chowdhury & Soumya Roy, 2018. "Optimum Life Test Plans in Presence of Type-I Hybrid Censoring for Products Sold under General Rebate Warranty," Working papers 280, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    6. Xiaojun Zhu & N. Balakrishnan & Helton Saulo, 2019. "On the existence and uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of Laplace Birnbaum–Saunders distribution based on Type-I, Type-II and hybrid censored samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(7), pages 759-778, October.
    7. Tzong-Ru Tsai & Yuhlong Lio & Wei-Chen Ting, 2021. "EM Algorithm for Mixture Distributions Model with Type-I Hybrid Censoring Scheme," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Suparna Basu & Sanjay K. Singh & Umesh Singh, 2019. "Estimation of Inverse Lindley Distribution Using Product of Spacings Function for Hybrid Censored Data," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1377-1394, December.
    9. Jimut Bahan Chakrabarty & Shovan Chowdhury & Soumya Roy, 2019. "Optimum life test plan for products sold under warranty having Type-I generalizedhybrid censored Weibull distributed lifetimes," Working papers 302, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    10. Farha Sultana & Yogesh Mani Tripathi & Shuo-Jye Wu & Tanmay Sen, 2022. "Inference for Kumaraswamy Distribution Based on Type I Progressive Hybrid Censoring," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 9(6), pages 1283-1307, December.
    11. Feizjavadian, S.H. & Hashemi, R., 2015. "Analysis of dependent competing risks in the presence of progressive hybrid censoring using Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 19-34.
    12. Julian Górny & Erhard Cramer, 2018. "Modularization of hybrid censoring schemes and its application to unified progressive hybrid censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 173-210, February.
    13. Ruhul Ali Khan & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Estimation issues in the Exponential–Logarithmic model under hybrid censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 419-450, February.
    14. Arnab Koley & Debasis Kundu, 2017. "On generalized progressive hybrid censoring in presence of competing risks," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 401-426, May.
    15. Mukhtar M Salah & Essam A Ahmed & Ziyad A Alhussain & Hanan Haj Ahmed & M El-Morshedy & M S Eliwa, 2021. "Statistical inferences for type-II hybrid censoring data from the alpha power exponential distribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Ping Chan & Hon Ng & Feng Su, 2015. "Exact likelihood inference for the two-parameter exponential distribution under Type-II progressively hybrid censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(6), pages 747-770, August.
    17. Subhankar Dutta & Suchandan Kayal, 2023. "Inference of a competing risks model with partially observed failure causes under improved adaptive type-II progressive censoring," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 765-780, August.
    18. Pareek, Bhuvanesh & Kundu, Debasis & Kumar, Sumit, 2009. "On progressively censored competing risks data for Weibull distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4083-4094, October.
    19. Debashis Samanta & Debasis Kundu & Ayon Ganguly, 2018. "Order Restricted Bayesian Analysis of a Simple Step Stress Model," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(2), pages 195-221, November.
    20. Jimut Bahan Chakrabarty & Soumya Roy & Shovan Chowdhury, 2019. "Optimum accelerated life test sampling plans for Type-I hybrid censored Weibull distributed products sold under general rebate warranty," Working papers 349, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:29:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11749-019-00660-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.