Hybrid censoring: Models, inferential results and applications
AbstractA hybrid censoring scheme is a mixture of Type-I and Type-II censoring schemes. In this review, we first discuss Type-I and Type-II hybrid censoring schemes and associated inferential issues. Next, we present details on developments regarding generalized hybrid censoring and unified hybrid censoring schemes that have been introduced in the literature. Hybrid censoring schemes have been adopted in competing risks set-up and in step-stress modeling and these results are outlined next. Recently, two new censoring schemes, viz., progressive hybrid censoring and adaptive progressive censoring schemes have been introduced in the literature. We discuss these censoring schemes and describe inferential methods based on them, and point out their advantages and disadvantages. Determining an optimal hybrid censoring scheme is an important design problem, and we shed some light on this issue as well. Finally, we present some examples to illustrate some of the results described here. Throughout the article, we mention some open problems and suggest some possible future work for the benefit of readers interested in this area of research.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.
Volume (Year): 57 (2013)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda
Type-I and Type-II hybrid censoring schemes; Progressive censoring scheme; Adaptive progressive censoring; Competing risks; Fisher information; Maximum likelihood estimators; Optimal sampling plans; Step-stress testing;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- N. Balakrishnan & G. Iliopoulos, 2010. "Stochastic monotonicity of the MLEs of parameters in exponential simple step-stress models under Type-I and Type-II censoring," Metrika, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 89-109, July.
- N. Balakrishnan & Qihao Xie & D. Kundu, 2009. "Exact inference for a simple step-stress model from the exponential distribution under time constraint," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 251-274, March.
- Debasis Kundu & Rameshwar Gupta, 2007. "Analysis of Hybrid Life-tests in Presence of Competing Risks," Metrika, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 159-170, February.
- Yao Zhang & William Q. Meeker, 2005. "Bayesian life test planning for the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter," Metrika, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 237-249, 06.
- Park, Sangun & Balakrishnan, N., 2009. "On simple calculation of the Fisher information in hybrid censoring schemes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(10), pages 1311-1319, May.
- Park, Sangun & Balakrishnan, N. & Zheng, Gang, 2008. "Fisher information in hybrid censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2781-2786, November.
- N. Balakrishnan & G. Iliopoulos, 2009. "Stochastic monotonicity of the MLE of exponential mean under different censoring schemes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 753-772, September.
- Ng, H. K. T. & Chan, P. S. & Balakrishnan, N., 2002. "Estimation of parameters from progressively censored data using EM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 371-386, June.
- Wang, Yanhua & He, Shuyuan, 2005. "Fisher information in censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 199-206, June.
- Balakrishnan, N. & Kateri, M., 2008. "On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(17), pages 2971-2975, December.
- Kundu, Debasis & Joarder, Avijit, 2006. "Analysis of Type-II progressively hybrid censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 2509-2528, June.
- A. Childs & B. Chandrasekar & N. Balakrishnan & D. Kundu, 2003. "Exact likelihood inference based on Type-I and Type-II hybrid censored samples from the exponential distribution," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 319-330, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wendy Shamier).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.