IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v29y2020i1d10.1007_s11749-019-00650-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective Bayesian comparison of order-constrained models in contingency tables

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Paroli

    (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore)

  • Guido Consonni

    (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore)

Abstract

In social and biomedical sciences, testing in contingency tables often involves order restrictions on cell probabilities parameters. We develop objective Bayes methods for order-constrained testing and model comparison when observations arise under product binomial or multinomial sampling. Specifically, we consider tests for monotone order of the parameters against equality of all parameters. Our strategy combines in a unified way both the intrinsic prior methodology and the encompassing prior approach in order to compute Bayes factors and posterior model probabilities. Performance of our method is evaluated on several simulation studies and real datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Paroli & Guido Consonni, 2020. "Objective Bayesian comparison of order-constrained models in contingency tables," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 139-165, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:29:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11749-019-00650-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-019-00650-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11749-019-00650-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-019-00650-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Consonni, Guido & La Rocca, Luca, 2008. "Tests Based on Intrinsic Priors for the Equality of Two Correlated Proportions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 1260-1269.
    2. Herbert Hoijtink, 2013. "Objective Bayes Factors for Inequality Constrained Hypotheses," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(2), pages 207-229, August.
    3. Wetzels, Ruud & Grasman, Raoul P.P.P. & Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, 2010. "An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2094-2102, September.
    4. Guido Consonni & Elias Moreno & Sergio Venturini, 2010. "Testing Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium: an Objective Bayesian Analysis," Quaderni di Dipartimento 121, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    5. Klugkist, Irene & Hoijtink, Herbert, 2007. "The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6367-6379, August.
    6. Guido Consonni & Roberta Paroli, 2017. "Objective Bayesian Comparison of Constrained Analysis of Variance Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 589-609, September.
    7. Casella, George & Moreno, Elías, 2009. "Assessing Robustness of Intrinsic Tests of Independence in Two-Way Contingency Tables," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1261-1271.
    8. G. Iliopoulos & M. Kateri & I. Ntzoufras, 2009. "Bayesian Model Comparison for the Order Restricted RC Association Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 561-587, December.
    9. M. J. Bayarri & G. García‐Donato, 2008. "Generalization of Jeffreys divergence‐based priors for Bayesian hypothesis testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 981-1003, November.
    10. Valen E. Johnson & Richard D. Payne & Tianying Wang & Alex Asher & Soutrik Mandal, 2017. "On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Ronald L. Wasserstein & Nicole A. Lazar, 2016. "The ASA's Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 129-133, May.
    12. Mulder, Joris, 2014. "Prior adjusted default Bayes factors for testing (in)equality constrained hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 448-463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Consonni & Roberta Paroli, 2017. "Objective Bayesian Comparison of Constrained Analysis of Variance Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 589-609, September.
    2. Andr'es Ram'irez-Hassan & Alejandro L'opez-Vera, 2021. "Semi-parametric estimation of the EASI model: Welfare implications of taxes identifying clusters due to unobserved preference heterogeneity," Papers 2109.07646, arXiv.org.
    3. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian comparison of models with inequality and equality constraints," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-182.
    4. Bartolucci, Francesco & Scaccia, Luisa & Farcomeni, Alessio, 2012. "Bayesian inference through encompassing priors and importance sampling for a class of marginal models for categorical data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4067-4080.
    5. Jean-Paul Fox & Joris Mulder & Sandip Sinharay, 2017. "Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 979-1006, December.
    6. Diego Salmeron & Juan Antonio Cano & Christian Robert, 2013. "Objective bayesian Hypothesis Testing in Binomial Regression Models with Integral Prior Distributions," Working Papers 2013-44, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    7. Oh, Man-Suk, 2014. "Bayesian test on equality of score parameters in the order restricted RC association model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 147-157.
    8. Jyotirmoy Sarkar, 2018. "Will P†Value Triumph over Abuses and Attacks?," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(4), pages 66-71, July.
    9. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & Ralf, Kirsten, 2018. "Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 65-101.
    10. Segurado, Pedro & Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano & Ferreira, Teresa & Branco, Paulo, 2022. "Stressor gradient coverage affects interaction identification," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    11. Uwe Hassler & Marc‐Oliver Pohle, 2022. "Unlucky Number 13? Manipulating Evidence Subject to Snooping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(2), pages 397-410, August.
    12. Kim, Jae H., 2017. "Stock returns and investors' mood: Good day sunshine or spurious correlation?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 94-103.
    13. Gergely Ganics & Atsushi Inoue & Barbara Rossi, 2021. "Confidence Intervals for Bias and Size Distortion in IV and Local Projections-IV Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 307-324, January.
    14. Hirschauer, Norbert & Grüner, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Claudia & Jantsch, Antje, 2020. "Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14, pages 71-91.
    15. Oliver Schilke & Sheen S. Levine & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2019. "Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 232-234, February.
    16. Dreber, Anna & Johannesson, Magnus, 2023. "A framework for evaluating reproducibility and replicability in economics," Ruhr Economic Papers 1055, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Lopez, Belen & Rangel, Celia & Fernández, Manuel, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility strategy on the management and governance axis for sustainable growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 690-698.
    18. Michaelides, Michael, 2021. "Large sample size bias in empirical finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    19. Kelter, Riko, 2022. "Power analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    20. Scott, E. Marian, 2018. "The role of Statistics in the era of big data: Crucial, critical and under-valued," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 20-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:29:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11749-019-00650-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.