IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v62y2021i4d10.1007_s00362-019-01154-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative studies on the adequacy check of parametric measurement error models with auxiliary variable

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihua Sun

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Dongshan Luo

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xiaohua Zhou

    (Peking University)

  • Qingzhao Zhang

    (Xiamen University)

Abstract

The adequacy check of regression models is a fundamental approach to avoid model misspecifications. Three types of tests: the weighted integrated squared distance test, the U-statistic test and the empirical process based test, are very popular due to attractive theoretical merits such as consistency and satisfactory performances in practice. In this paper, we apply these three tests to check the adequacy of a mean parametric regression model with measurement error. By rigorously investigating the asymptotic properties of three testing methods under the null, local and global alternative hypotheses, we make detailed comparisons for the three tests. To the best of our knowledge, the results of these theoretical comparisons are novel. We conduct simulation studies and a real data analysis to compare the finite sample behaviors of the proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihua Sun & Dongshan Luo & Xiaohua Zhou & Qingzhao Zhang, 2021. "Comparative studies on the adequacy check of parametric measurement error models with auxiliary variable," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1723-1751, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:62:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-019-01154-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-019-01154-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-019-01154-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-019-01154-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    2. Song, Weixing, 2009. "Lack-of-fit testing in errors-in-variables regression model with validation data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 765-773, March.
    3. Xie, Chuanlong & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "A goodness-of-fit test for variable-adjusted models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 27-48.
    4. Li, Q. & Wang, Suojin, 1998. "A simple consistent bootstrap test for a parametric regression function," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 145-165, August.
    5. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    6. Sun, Zhihua & Wang, Qihua & Dai, Pengjie, 2009. "Model checking for partially linear models with missing responses at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 636-651, April.
    7. Liang Li & Tom Greene, 2008. "Varying Coefficients Model with Measurement Error," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 519-526, June.
    8. Escanciano, J. Carlos, 2006. "A Consistent Diagnostic Test For Regression Models Using Projections," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 1030-1051, December.
    9. Zhang, Jun & Li, Gaorong & Feng, Zhenghui, 2015. "Checking the adequacy for a distortion errors-in-variables parametric regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 52-64.
    10. Hall, Peter, 1984. "Central limit theorem for integrated square error of multivariate nonparametric density estimators," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Simos G. Meintanis & James Allison & Leonard Santana, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests for semiparametric and parametric hypotheses based on the probability weighted empirical characteristic function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 957-976, December.
    12. Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Nonparametric check for partial linear errors-in-covariables models with validation data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(4), pages 793-815, August.
    13. Zhang, Chunming & Dette, Holger, 2004. "A power comparison between nonparametric regression tests," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 289-301, February.
    14. John Xu Zheng, 1996. "A consistent test of functional form via nonparametric estimation techniques," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 263-289, December.
    15. Zhao, Peixin & Xue, Liugen, 2010. "Variable selection for semiparametric varying coefficient partially linear errors-in-variables models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(8), pages 1872-1883, September.
    16. Elias Masry, 1996. "Multivariate Local Polynomial Regression For Time Series:Uniform Strong Consistency And Rates," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(6), pages 571-599, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Zhihua & Chen, Feifei & Zhou, Xiaohua & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2017. "Improved model checking methods for parametric models with responses missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 147-161.
    2. Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Model checking for parametric regressions with response missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(2), pages 229-259, April.
    3. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Song, Xiaojun, 2019. "Specification tests for the propensity score," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 379-404.
    4. El Ghouch, Anouar & Genton, Marc G. & Bouezmarni , Taoufik, 2012. "Measuring the Discrepancy of a Parametric Model via Local Polynomial Smoothing," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Cuizhen Niu & Lixing Zhu, 2018. "A robust adaptive-to-model enhancement test for parametric single-index models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(5), pages 1013-1045, October.
    6. Anouar El Ghouch & Marc G. Genton & Taoufik Bouezmarni, 2013. "Measuring the Discrepancy of a Parametric Model via Local Polynomial Smoothing," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(3), pages 455-470, September.
    7. Junmin Liu & Deli Zhu & Luoyao Yu & Xuehu Zhu, 2023. "Specification testing of partially linear single-index models: a groupwise dimension reduction-based adaptive-to-model approach," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 232-262, March.
    8. Malikov, Emir & Sun, Yiguo, 2017. "Semiparametric estimation and testing of smooth coefficient spatial autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 12-34.
    9. Bagkavos, Dimitrios & Patil, Prakash N. & Wood, Andrew T.A., 2023. "Nonparametric goodness-of-fit testing for a continuous multivariate parametric model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Kloodt, Nick & Neumeyer, Natalie, 2020. "Specification tests in semiparametric transformation models — A multiplier bootstrap approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Liu, Zhenjun & Stengos, Thanasis & Li, Qi, 2000. "Nonparametric model check based on local polynomial fitting," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 327-334, July.
    12. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    13. Sun, Yiguo & Malikov, Emir, 2018. "Estimation and inference in functional-coefficient spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 359-378.
    14. Li, Hongjun & Li, Qi & Liu, Ruixuan, 2016. "Consistent model specification tests based on k-nearest-neighbor estimation method," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 187-202.
    15. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Xiaojun Song & Qi Xu, 2022. "Covariate distribution balance via propensity scores," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1093-1120, September.
    16. Fernandes, Marcelo & Grammig, Joachim, 2005. "Nonparametric specification tests for conditional duration models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 35-68, July.
    17. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2005:i:11:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Gozalo, Pedro L. & Linton, Oliver B., 2001. "Testing additivity in generalized nonparametric regression models with estimated parameters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 1-48, August.
    19. Russell Davidson & Victoria Zinde‐Walsh, 2017. "Advances in specification testing," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 1595-1631, December.
    20. Yu, Ping & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2018. "Threshold regression with endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 50-68.
    21. Hsiao, Cheng & Li, Qi & Racine, Jeffrey S., 2007. "A consistent model specification test with mixed discrete and continuous data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 802-826, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:62:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-019-01154-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.