IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sorede/v33y2022i3d10.1134_s107570072203008x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Questions of Assessing the Level of State Support to Industry and Its Impact on Economic Indicators of Development in Regional Integration Associations

Author

Listed:
  • N. G. Kushnarev

    (Eurasian Economic Commission)

  • N. N. Rogozhnik

    (Eurasian Economic Commission)

  • L. V. Tsybulnik

    (Eurasian Economic Commission)

  • I. V. Shamatrin

    (Eurasian Economic Commission)

  • A. Yu. Pak

    (Eurasian Economic Commission)

Abstract

— In the article, based on the analysis of world theoretical and practical ideas, a methodological approach has been developed to assess the level of state support for industry based on the use of a set of indicators: the amount of state support in GDP, industrial production, and industries. Separately, an approach is proposed to assess the level of state support for exports, taking into account the possibility of determining the volume of industrial subsidies in order to facilitate the promotion of goods to foreign markets. In addition, the article proposes a methodological approach to facilitate the impact of the volume of industrial subsidies on certain economic indicators related to the goals of implementing state support measures based on an analysis of the industrial support policy in regional integration associations.

Suggested Citation

  • N. G. Kushnarev & N. N. Rogozhnik & L. V. Tsybulnik & I. V. Shamatrin & A. Yu. Pak, 2022. "Questions of Assessing the Level of State Support to Industry and Its Impact on Economic Indicators of Development in Regional Integration Associations," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 249-256, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1134_s107570072203008x
    DOI: 10.1134/S107570072203008X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S107570072203008X
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S107570072203008X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Vandierendonck, 2014. "Public Spending Reviews: design, conduct, implementation," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 525, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    2. Debra Bloch & Jean-Marc Fournier, 2018. "The deterioration of the public spending mix during the global financial crisis: Insights from new indicators," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1465, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dorothée Allain-Dupré & Claudia Hulbert & Margaux Vincent, 2017. "Subnational Infrastructure Investment in OECD Countries: Trends and Key Governance Levers," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2017/05, OECD Publishing.
    2. Rui Nuno Baleiras, 2014. "Towards predictability and sustainability of public finances: a commentary on 'Control of the Central Government Budget Outturn'," CFP Occasional Papers 02/2014, Portuguese Public Finance Council.
    3. Daniela Monacelli & Aline Pennisi, 2015. "Spending Review: una, nessuna, centomila," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 69-108.
    4. Álvaro Pina, 2016. "Making public finances more growth and equity-friendly in the euro area," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1316, OECD Publishing.
    5. Olga V. Bogacheva & Oleg V. Smorodinov, 2018. "Features of Spending Reviews in Ireland: Experience for Russia," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 34-45, October.
    6. Nikolai A. Begchin & Olga V. Bogacheva & Oleg V. Smorodinov, 2018. "Spending Reviews as an Instrument for Public Finance Management in OECD Countries: Theoretical Aspect," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 3, pages 49-63, June.
    7. Gianluca Misuraca & Csaba Kucsera & Fiorenza Lipparini & Christian Voigt & Raluca Radescu, 2016. "Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation initiatives promoting social investment in integrated approaches to the provision of social services: IESI Knowledge Map 2015," JRC Research Reports JRC101042, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Jean-Marc Fournier & Philipp Lieberknecht, 2020. "A Model-based Fiscal Taylor Rule and a Toolkit to Assess the Fiscal Stance," IMF Working Papers 2020/033, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Pessino, Carola & Izquierdo, Alejandro & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2018. "Better Spending for Better Lives: How Latin America and the Caribbean Can Do More with Less," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 9152.
    10. Bartłomiej Wiczewski, 2020. "Budget System in Poland: Challenges and Ongoing Reforms," European Economy - Economic Briefs 060, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    11. Olga V. Bogacheva & Oleg V. Smorodinov, 2019. "Creation of Enabling Environment for Spending Reviews in Russia," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 21-33, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sorede:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1134_s107570072203008x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.