IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v167y2023i1d10.1007_s11205-023-03102-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can People with Disabilities Use the Outdoors? An Assessment Within the Framework of Disability Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Busra Akgun Piskin

    (Bursa Uludag University)

  • Nilufer Seyidoglu Akdeniz

    (Bursa Uludag University)

Abstract

The urban parks, where people interact with nature, be socialize and relieve stress, are located in urban open green spaces, and their importance has increased even more with pandemi in todays. Parks should be designed within the framework of design approaches that allow everyone to benefit equally and should serve all users in the city. Especially special arrangements are necessary for people with disabilities who are known as the disadvantaged group among urban people use these parks. Designs should be improved in accordance with the standars determined for the people with disabilities. It’s required to evaluate the factors that will be constraints for them and to ensure effective use. In this study, four city parks (Reşat Oyal Kültürpark, Merinos Park, Soğanlı Botanic Park and Hüdavendigar City Park) located in Bursa and serving all the people of the city were evaluated. The observation and evaluation techniques were used for determine the parks, entrances, parking lots, road circulation, etc. Afterward, the data were analyzed by evaluating within the scope of the standards available for people with disabilities and their suitability. As a result, it was observed that the parks partially comply with the standards and there are some important situations that will cause problems for people with disabilities. Although there are no items such as tactile surfaces and reinforcement buttons in the parks, it has been determined that there are deficiencies such as level differences on the road floors, the absence of stairs and ramp solutions, and also the inconsistency of the dimensions of the reinforcement elements. In this case, In this case, the obstacles in front of the people with disabilities may be removed and a comfortable circulation may be provided by solving the existing problems and completing the deficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Busra Akgun Piskin & Nilufer Seyidoglu Akdeniz, 2023. "How Can People with Disabilities Use the Outdoors? An Assessment Within the Framework of Disability Standards," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 153-174, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:167:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-023-03102-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-023-03102-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-023-03102-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-023-03102-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuliana Parodi & Dario Sciulli, 2019. "Disability and Social Exclusion in Italian Households," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 767-784, July.
    2. Sedigheh Lotfi & M. Koohsari, 2009. "Analyzing Accessibility Dimension of Urban Quality of Life: Where Urban Designers Face Duality Between Subjective and Objective Reading of Place," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 417-435, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mussida, Chiara & Sciulli, Dario, 2023. "The evolution of income distribution and disability in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 29-38.
    2. Chiara Mussida & Dario Sciulli, 2022. "Disability and Material Deprivation: A Profile of Disadvantage in Italy," Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, Vita e Pensiero, Pubblicazioni dell'Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, vol. 130(2), pages 169-190.
    3. Musa Pazhuhan & Saeed Zanganeh Shahraki & Niloofar Kaveerad & Sirio Cividino & Matteo Clemente & Luca Salvati, 2020. "Factors Underlying Life Quality in Urban Contexts: Evidence from an Industrial City (Arak, Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. José Manuel Viegas, 2012. "The urban mobility system and regional competitiveness," Chapters, in: Roberta Capello & Tomaz Ponce Dentinho (ed.), Networks, Space and Competitiveness, chapter 2, pages 35-55, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Lättman, Katrin & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta, 2016. "Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 257-263.
    6. Lättman, Katrin & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta, 2018. "A new approach to accessibility – Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 501-511.
    7. Juan Jiménez-Caldera & José Luis Serrano-Montes & Raúl Pérez-Arévalo & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Luca Salvati & Andrés Caballero-Calvo, 2022. "A Conceptual Model for Planning and Management of Areas of Public Space and Meeting in Colombia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Angela Curl & John Nelson & Jillian Anable, 2011. "Comparing the lived experience to objective measures of Accessibility," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1262, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Eva Haslauer & Elizabeth Delmelle & Alexander Keul & Thomas Blaschke & Thomas Prinz, 2015. "Comparing Subjective and Objective Quality of Life Criteria: A Case Study of Green Space and Public Transport in Vienna, Austria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 911-927, December.
    10. Katrin Lättman & Margareta Friman & Lars E. Olsson, 2016. "Perceived Accessibility of Public Transport as a Potential Indicator of Social Inclusion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 36-45.
    11. Pot, Felix Johan & van Wee, Bert & Tillema, Taede, 2021. "Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Poh-Chin Lai & Si Chen & Chien-Tat Low & Ester Cerin & Robert Stimson & Pui Yun Paulina Wong, 2018. "Neighborhood Variation of Sustainable Urban Morphological Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Witsarut Achariyaviriya & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Hiroyuki Takeshita & Masanobu Kii & Varameth Vichiensan & Thanaruk Theeramunkong, 2021. "Can Space–Time Shifting of Activities and Travels Mitigate Hyper-Congestion in an Emerging Megacity, Bangkok? Effects on Quality of Life and CO 2 Emission," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Hsueh-Sheng Chang & Chin-Hsien Liao, 2015. "Planning emergency shelter locations based on evacuation behavior," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1551-1571, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:167:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-023-03102-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.