IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v116y2014i3p971-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the WHOQOL-BREF Using a Multitrait-Multimethod Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Yu Hsiao
  • Chia-Huei Wu
  • Grace Yao

Abstract

The WHOQOL-BREF is a commonly used questionnaire in quality of life research. Previous research has shown that the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health) are highly related. Whether these high correlations reflected the true relations across the domains or the influence of common method effect; however, is still unknown. This study examines the convergent and discriminant validity of the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF by using the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) approach to control the method effect. Two different samples, with a total of 186 and 201 adults, respectively, were used in the present study. Each participant filled out the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires using four different scaling methods (Likert-type scale, visual analogue scale, pie scale, and partner rating). The covariance matrix of the MTMM result was analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis modeling. Two models were applied, including the correlated traits-correlated uniqueness (CTCU) model and the uncorrelated traits-correlated uniqueness (UTCU) model. Results showed that the CTCU model fit the data better than did the UTCU model, suggesting that the variables tapping the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF have excellent convergent validity; the four domains have moderate correlations, indicating that the four domains are related but not identical. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Yu Hsiao & Chia-Huei Wu & Grace Yao, 2014. "Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the WHOQOL-BREF Using a Multitrait-Multimethod Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 971-988, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:116:y:2014:i:3:p:971-988
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0313-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-013-0313-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-013-0313-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grace Yao & Chia-huei Wu & Cheng-ta Yang, 2008. "Examining the content validity of the WHOQOL-BREF from respondents’ perspective by quantitative methods," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 483-498, February.
    2. Frank Andrews & Rick Crandall, 1976. "The validity of measures of self-reported well-being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sasa Wang & Xueyan Yang & Lisa Eklund, 2022. "Discrimination and Quality of Life Among Marriage-Squeezed Men in Rural China: Unexpected Functions of Structural and Functional Social Support," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 885-905, February.
    2. Katherine Ka Pik Chang & Frances Kam Yuet Wong & Ka Long Chan & Fiona Wong & Hung Chak Ho & Man Sing Wong & Yuen Shan Ho & John Wai Man Yuen & Judy Yuen-man Siu & Lin Yang, 2020. "The Impact of the Environment on the Quality of Life and the Mediating Effects of Sleep and Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Hoorn, André, 2018. "Is the happiness approach to measuring preferences valid?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 53-65.
    2. Omer Sagie, 2016. "Well-Being in Older Gays and Lesbians: A Comparison of Predictors," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 395-409, March.
    3. van Hoorn, Andre, 2016. "Reliability and Validity of the Happiness Approach to Measuring Preferences," MPRA Paper 79977, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Wen-Ching Chen & Jung-Der Wang & Jing-Shiang Hwang & Chiao-Chicy Chen & Chia-Huei Wu & Grace Yao, 2009. "Can the Web-Form WHOQOL-BREF be an Alternative to the Paper-Form?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 97-114, October.
    5. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Pittipol Kantavat & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Boonserm Kijsirikul & Yuji Iwahori, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Effects of Built Environment on Quality of Life Related Transportation by Integrating GIS and Deep Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Ann Bowling & Joy Windsor, 2001. "Towards the Good Life: A Population Survey of Dimensions of Quality of Life," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 55-82, March.
    7. Rick Crandall, 1976. "Validation of Self-Report Measures Using Ratings By Others," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 4(3), pages 380-400, February.
    8. Jean-Charles Pillet & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni & Kevin Carillo, 2018. "Detecting Biased Items When Developing a Scale: A Quantitative Method," Post-Print halshs-01923612, HAL.
    9. Robert Cummins, 2003. "Normative Life Satisfaction: Measurement Issues and a Homeostatic Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 225-256, November.
    10. Marne Arthaud-day & Joseph Rode & Christine Mooney & Janet Near, 2005. "The Subjective Well-being Construct: A Test of its Convergent, Discriminant, and Factorial Validity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 445-476, December.
    11. Yoshikawa, Katsuhhiko & Wu, Chia-Huei & Lee, Hyun-Jung, 2020. "Generalized exchange orientation: conceptualization and scale development," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101478, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Bazley, William J. & Dayani, Arash & Jannati, Sima, 2021. "Transient emotions, perceptions of well-being, and mutual fund flows," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Jean-Charles Pillet & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni & Kevin Carillo, 2018. "Detecting Biased Items When Developing a Scale: A Quantitative Method," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923612, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:116:y:2014:i:3:p:971-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.