IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v95y2013i3d10.1007_s11192-012-0892-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical investigation of the influence of collaboration in Finance on article impact

Author

Listed:
  • Necmi K. Avkiran

    (The University of Queensland)

Abstract

We investigate the impact of collaborative research in academic Finance literature to find out whether and to what extent collaboration leads to higher impact articles (6,667 articles across 2001–2007 extracted from the Web of Science). Using the top 5 % as ranked by the 4-year citation counts following publication, we also follow related secondary research questions such as the relationships between article impact and author impact; collaboration and average author impact of an article; and, the nature of geographic collaboration. Key findings indicate: collaboration does lead to articles of higher impact but there is no significant marginal value for collaboration beyond three authors; high impact articles are not monopolized by high impact authors; collaboration and the average author impact of high-impact articles are positively associated, where collaborative articles have a higher mean author impact in comparison to single-author articles; and collaboration among the authors of high impact articles is mostly cross-institutional.

Suggested Citation

  • Necmi K. Avkiran, 2013. "An empirical investigation of the influence of collaboration in Finance on article impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 911-925, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:95:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0892-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0892-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-012-0892-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-012-0892-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Deb. Beaver, 2001. "Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 365-377, November.
    2. Currie, Russell R. & Pandher, Gurupdesh S., 2011. "Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-20, January.
    3. Stephen M. Lawani & Alan E. Bayer, 1983. "Validity of citation criteria for assessing the influence of scientific publications: New evidence with peer assessment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 34(1), pages 59-66, January.
    4. Kenneth A. Borokhovich & Robert J. Bricker & Betty J. Simkins, 2000. "An Analysis of Finance Journal Impact Factors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(3), pages 1457-1469, June.
    5. Jeffrey T Leek & Margaret A Taub & Fernando J Pineda, 2011. "Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Jonathan M. Levitt & Mike Thelwall, 2010. "Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 171-183, October.
    7. Pedro Cosme Vieira & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2010. "Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 627-646, December.
    8. Francesco Giuliani & Michele Pio De Petris & Giovanni Nico, 2010. "Assessing scientific collaboration through coauthorship and content sharing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 13-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Li & Huajiao Li & Nairong Liu & Xueyong Liu, 2018. "Important institutions of interinstitutional scientific collaboration networks in materials science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 85-103, October.
    2. Nataliya N. Matveeva & Oleg V. Poldin, 2017. "How Network Characteristics of Researchers Relate to Their Citation Indicators – a Co-Authorship Network Analysis Based on Google Scholar," HSE Working papers WP BRP 44/EDU/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Yang Liu & Jinyuan Ma & Huanyu Song & Ziniu Qian & Xiao Lin, 2021. "Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Jiang Li & Yueting Li, 2015. "Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 1997-2010, March.
    5. Matveeva, Nataliya & Poldin, Oleg, 2016. "Citation of scholars in co-authorship network: Analysis of Google Scholar data," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 44, pages 100-118.
    6. Necmi Avkiran & Karen Alpert, 2015. "The influence of co-authorship on article impact in OR/MS/OM and the exchange of knowledge with Finance in the twenty-first century," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 51-73, December.
    7. Grossmann, Axel & Lee, Allissa, 2022. "An analysis of finance journal accessibility: Author inclusivity and journal quality," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Necmi Avkiran & Karen Alpert, 2015. "The influence of co-authorship on article impact in OR/MS/OM and the exchange of knowledge with Finance in the twenty-first century," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 51-73, December.
    2. Samitas, Aristeidis & Kampouris, Elias, 2018. "Empirical investigation of co-authorship in the field of finance: A network perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 235-246.
    3. Morris G. Danielson & Jean L. Heck, 2014. "Voting with Their Feet: In Which Journals Do the Most Prolific Finance Researchers Publish?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(1), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Eduardo C. Oliveira & Michele N. Juca, 2021. "Multinational Dividend Policies: A Systematic Literature Review to Future," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 442-465.
    5. Enrico Miersch, 2020. "Research Evaluation of Financial Research - Evidence from a Survey," Credit and Capital Markets, Credit and Capital Markets, vol. 53(3), pages 383-419.
    6. José M. Merigó & Jian-Bo Yang, 2017. "Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(1), pages 71-100, March.
    7. Kerl, Alexander & Miersch, Enrico & Walter, Andreas, 2018. "Evaluation of academic finance conferences," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 26-38.
    8. Chongyu Dang & Zhichuan (Frank) Li, 2020. "Drivers of research impact: evidence from the top three finance journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2759-2809, September.
    9. Reinartz, Sebastian J. & Urban, Daniel, 2017. "Finance conference quality and publication success: A conference ranking," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 155-174.
    10. Chung, Kee H. & Cox, Raymond A.K. & Kim, Kenneth A., 2009. "On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: Evidence from the finance academe," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 893-916, August.
    11. Berninger, Marc & Kiesel, Florian & Schiereck, Dirk & Gaar, Eduard, 2021. "Citations and the readers’ information-extracting costs of finance articles," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Claudio Vitari, 2014. "Electronic currencies for purposive degrowth?," Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management hal-00975432, HAL.
    13. Carillo, Maria Rosaria & Papagni, Erasmo & Sapio, Alessandro, 2013. "Do collaborations enhance the high-quality output of scientific institutions? Evidence from the Italian Research Assessment Exercise," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-36.
    14. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    15. Lemarchand, Guillermo A., 2012. "The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 291-305.
    16. Currie, Russell R. & Pandher, Gurupdesh S., 2011. "Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-20, January.
    17. Matthias Weber, 2016. "The Effects of Listing Authors in Alphabetical Order: A survey of the Empirical Evidence," Bank of Lithuania Occasional Paper Series 12, Bank of Lithuania.
    18. Olle Persson & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2014. "Discouraging honorific authorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1417-1419, February.
    19. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    20. Kam C. Chan & Chih†Hsiang Chang & Y. Ling Lo, 2009. "A Retrospective Evaluation of European Financial Management (1995–2008)," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 676-691, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Collaboration; Citation analysis; Article impact; Author impact; Finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:95:y:2013:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0892-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.