IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v67y2006i2d10.1007_s11192-006-0095-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case

Author

Listed:
  • Adela García-Aracil

    (Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Technical University of Valencia)

  • Antonio Gutiérrez Gracia

    (Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Technical University of Valencia)

  • Marián Pérez-Marín

    (Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Technical University of Valencia)

Abstract

Summary In this paper we analyze the objectivity of the peer review process of research performance by research groups in the scientific and technological Valencian system, over the period 1998-2002. For that purpose, we use qualitative and quantitative indicators to assess which of them are the most important to determine a research group as excellent one, based on peer review evaluation methodology. The results show that excellence appears to be driven only by publications in SCI/SSCI and the number of sexenios, and suggest that the peer review process is not as objective as we expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Adela García-Aracil & Antonio Gutiérrez Gracia & Marián Pérez-Marín, 2006. "Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(2), pages 213-230, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:67:y:2006:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-006-0095-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-006-0095-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. W. Fedderke, 2013. "The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 177-206, November.
    2. Pedro Cosme Vieira & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2010. "Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 627-646, December.
    3. Johannes W. Fedderke, 2012. "The Objectivity of National Research Foundation Peer Review Based Ratings in South Africa," Working Papers 300, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    4. Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio & Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida & Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín & Olmeda Gómez, Carlos & Moya-Anegón, Félix, 2009. "Synthetic hybrid indicators based on scientific collaboration to quantify and evaluate individual research results," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 91-101.
    5. Cabeza-Pullés, Dainelis & Fernández-Pérez, Virginia & Roldán-Bravo, María Isabel, 2020. "Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 450-461.
    6. Chiang Kao & Hwei-Lan Pao, 2009. "An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 261-277, February.
    7. Liney Manjarrés-Henríquez & Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia & Jaider Vega-Jurado, 2008. "Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(3), pages 561-576, September.
    8. Adela García Aracil & Davinia Palomares Montero, 2010. "Fuzzy cluster analysis on Spanish public universities," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 5, in: María Jesús Mancebón-Torrubia & Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún & José María Gómez-Sancho & Gregorio Gim (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 5, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 49, pages 976-994, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:67:y:2006:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-006-0095-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.