IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v106y2016i2d10.1007_s11192-015-1803-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adding authorship order to the quantity and quality dimensions of scholarly productivity: evidence from group- and individual-level analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn D. Walters

    (Kutztown University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether authorship order—as measured by first author publications, citations to first author publications, and the first author h-index—plays a significant role in scholarly productivity. Scholarly productivity was assessed in this study with publications from 2011 to 2014 and citations to these publications as indexed by the Thomson Web of Science. Using a correlational design, a group-level analysis of 36 Ph.D.-granting departments of criminology and criminal justice revealed that ratings from a U.S. News & World Report (USN&WR) survey correlated significantly better with aggregate program first author publications than with aggregate program total publications, although citations to first author publications and the first author h-index failed to correlate significantly better with the USN&WR than citing articles to total publications and the total publication h-index, respectively. An individual-level correlational analysis of all 228 full professors from 44 programs offering a Ph.D. in criminology/criminal justice showed that time until promotion to full professor displayed a significantly stronger inverse correlation with the number of first author publications, the number of citations to first author publications, and the first author h-index than with the total number of publications, the number of citing articles to total publications, and the total publication h-index, respectively. Hence, at both the group and individual levels first author publications and at the individual level citations to first author publications and the first author h-index provided a better estimate of scholarly productivity than their respective total publication counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn D. Walters, 2016. "Adding authorship order to the quantity and quality dimensions of scholarly productivity: evidence from group- and individual-level analyses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 769-785, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:106:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1803-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1803-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1803-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1803-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn D. Walters, 2015. "Measuring the quantity and quality of scholarly productivity in criminology and criminal justice: a test of three integrated models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2011-2022, March.
    2. Thomas, Charles W. & Bronick, Matthew J., 1984. "The quality of doctoral programs in deviance, criminology, and criminal justice: An empirical assessment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 21-37.
    3. Sorensen, Jon & Pilgrim, Rocky, 2002. "The institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 11-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    2. Alexandre Rodrigues Oliveira & Carlos Fernando Mello, 2016. "Importance and susceptibility of scientific productivity indicators: two sides of the same coin," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 697-722, November.
    3. Edson Melo Souza & Jose Eduardo Storopoli & Wonder Alexandre Luz Alves, 2022. "Scientific Contribution List Categories Investigation: a comparison between three mainstream medical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2249-2276, May.
    4. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2018. "Do Norwegian academics who publish more earn higher salaries?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 263-281, April.
    5. Balázs Győrffy & Andrea Magda Nagy & Péter Herman & Ádám Török, 2018. "Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 409-426, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steiner, Benjamin & Schwartz, John, 2006. "The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 393-400.
    2. Ross, Lee E. & Edwards, Willie J., 1998. "Publishing among African American criminologists: A devaluing experience?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 29-40.
    3. Walters, Glenn D. & Mandracchia, Jon T., 2017. "Testing criminological theory through causal mediation analysis: Current status and future directions," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 53-64.
    4. Sorensen, Jon & Pilgrim, Rocky, 2002. "The institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 11-18.
    5. Fabianic, David, 2002. "Publication productivity of criminal justice faculty in criminal justice journals," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 549-558.
    6. Timothy D. Fry & Joan M. Donohue, 2014. "Exploring the Author Affiliation Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1647-1667, March.
    7. Fabianic, David, 1998. "The status of criminal justice p.d. programs in higher education," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 399-408, September.
    8. Fabianic, David, 2001. "Frequently published scholars and educational backgrounds," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 119-125.
    9. Sorensen, Jon R., 2009. "An assessment of the relative impact of criminal justice and criminology journals," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 505-511, September.
    10. Fabianic, David, 1999. "Educational backgrounds of most-cited scholars," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 517-524.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:106:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1803-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.