IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v104y2015i1d10.1007_s11192-015-1600-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The deconstruction of a text: the permanence of the generalized Zipf law—the inter-textual relationship between entropy and effort amount

Author

Listed:
  • Thierry Lafouge

    (Université de Lyon
    Université Lyon 1)

  • Abdellatif Agouzal

    (Université Lyon 1
    Université de Lyon)

  • Genevieve Lallich

    (Université de Lyon
    Université Lyon 1)

Abstract

Zipf’s law has intrigued people for a long time. This distribution models a certain type of statistical regularity observed in a text. George K. Zipf showed that, if a word is characterised by its frequency, then, rank and frequency are not independent and approximately verify the relationship: $${\text{Rank }} \times {\text{ frequency}} \approx {\text{constant}}$$ Rank × frequency ≈ constant Various explanations have been advanced to explain this law. In this article, we talk about the Mandelbrot process, which includes two very different approaches. In the first approach, Mandelbrot studies language generation as the transmission of a signal and bases it on information theory, using the entropy concept. In the second, geometric approach, he draws a parallel with the fractal theory, where each word of the text is a sequence of characters framed by two separators, meaning a simple geometric pattern. This leads us to hypothesise that, since the statistical regularities observed have several possible explanations, Zipf’s law carries other patterns. To verify this hypothesis, we chose a text, which we modified and degraded in several successive stages. We called T i the text degraded at step i. We then segmented T i into words. We found that rank and frequency were not independent and approximately verified the relationship: $${\text{Rank}}\,\beta_{i} \, \times {\text{ frequency}} \approx {\text{constant}}\quad \beta_{i} \, > 1$$ Rank β i × frequency ≈ constant β i > 1 The coefficient β i increases with each step i. We call Eq. (1) the generalized Zipf law. We found statistical regularities in the deconstruction of the text. We notably observed a linear relationship between the entropy H i and the amount of effort E i of the various degraded texts T i . To verify our assumptions, we degraded a text of approximately 200 pages. At each step, we calculated various parameters such as entropy, the amount of effort, and the coefficient. We observed an inter-textual relationship between entropy and the amount of effort. This paper therefore provides a proof of this relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Thierry Lafouge & Abdellatif Agouzal & Genevieve Lallich, 2015. "The deconstruction of a text: the permanence of the generalized Zipf law—the inter-textual relationship between entropy and effort amount," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 193-217, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:104:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1600-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1600-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1600-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1600-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lafouge, Thierry & Agouzal, Abdelatif, 2015. "The source-effort coverage of an exponential informetric process," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 156-168.
    2. L. Benguigui & E. Blumenfeld-Lieberthal, 2011. "The end of a paradigm: is Zipf’s law universal?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 87-100, March.
    3. Egghe, L., 2013. "The functional relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor revisited," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 183-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Zewen & Wu, Yishan, 2014. "Regularity in the time-dependent distribution of the percentage of never-cited papers: An empirical pilot study based on the six journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 136-146.
    2. Zewen Hu & Yishan Wu & Jianjun Sun, 2018. "A quantitative analysis of determinants of non-citation using a panel data model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 843-861, August.
    3. Pérez Valbuena, Gerson Javier & Meisel Roca, Adolfo, 2014. "Ley De Zipf Y De Gibrat Para Colombia Y Sus Regiones: 1835-2005," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 247-286, September.
    4. Jianhua Hou & Jiantao Ye, 2020. "Are uncited papers necessarily all nonimpact papers? A quantitative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1631-1662, August.
    5. Jeppe Nicolaisen & Tove Faber Frandsen, 2019. "Zero impact: a large-scale study of uncitedness," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1227-1254, May.
    6. Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti & Tommaso Lando, 2017. "A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1415-1448, June.
    7. Marcel Ausloos, 2014. "Zipf–Mandelbrot–Pareto model for co-authorship popularity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1565-1586, December.
    8. Lucio Bertoli-Barsotti & Tommaso Lando, 2017. "The h-index as an almost-exact function of some basic statistics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1209-1228, November.
    9. Burrell, Quentin L., 2013. "A stochastic approach to the relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 676-682.
    10. Pablo Dorta-González & Rafael Suárez-Vega & María Isabel Dorta-González, 2020. "Open access effect on uncitedness: a large-scale study controlling by discipline, source type and visibility," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 2619-2644, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:104:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1600-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.