IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sankhb/v83y2021i2d10.1007_s13571-020-00229-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-level zero-inflated Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression model for analyzing dispersed clustered count data with extra zeros

Author

Listed:
  • Somayeh Ghorbani Gholiabad

    (Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)

  • Abbas Moghimbeigi

    (Alborz University of Medical Sciences)

  • Javad Faradmal

    (Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
    Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)

Abstract

The count response variables are usually included of extra zeros. A useful tool for modeling such data is zero-inflated regression models. In the last decade, the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson model is applied for analyzing count data that can handle under- and over-dispersed data, besides that can encompass the Poisson and negative binomial. Sometimes, due to the sampling design or the data collection procedure, the data simultaneously are clustered or correlated with extra zeros and under- or over-dispersion. We applied a three-level zero-inflated Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression model to overcome these problems. An expectation-maximization algorithm is used to estimate the model parameters of an appropriate penalized log-likelihood function. Model flexibility and finite-sample properties of this methodology have been investigated by extensive simulation study. The method has been illustrated with an application on real data in the health survey. Furthermore, we compared the results of the model with a three-level zero-inflated negative binomial regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Somayeh Ghorbani Gholiabad & Abbas Moghimbeigi & Javad Faradmal, 2021. "Three-level zero-inflated Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression model for analyzing dispersed clustered count data with extra zeros," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 415-439, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sankhb:v:83:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s13571-020-00229-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13571-020-00229-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13571-020-00229-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13571-020-00229-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seth D. Guikema & Jeremy P. Goffelt, 2008. "A Flexible Count Data Regression Model for Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 213-223, February.
    2. Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba & Somnath Datta, 2018. "Analyzing clustered count data with a cluster-specific random effect zero-inflated Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 799-814, April.
    3. Sellers, Kimberly F. & Raim, Andrew, 2016. "A flexible zero-inflated model to address data dispersion," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 68-80.
    4. Royce A. Francis & Srinivas Reddy Geedipally & Seth D. Guikema & Soma Sekhar Dhavala & Dominique Lord & Sarah LaRocca, 2012. "Characterizing the Performance of the Conway‐Maxwell Poisson Generalized Linear Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 167-183, January.
    5. Moghimbeigi, Abbas & Eshraghian, Mohammad Reza & Mohammad, Kazem & McArdle, Brian, 2009. "A score test for zero-inflation in multilevel count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1239-1248, February.
    6. Ramesh Gupta & S. Sim & S. Ong, 2014. "Analysis of discrete data by Conway–Maxwell Poisson distribution," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 98(4), pages 327-343, October.
    7. Abbas Moghimbeigi & Mohammed Reza Eshraghian & Kazem Mohammad & Brian Mcardle, 2008. "Multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling for over-dispersed count data with extra zeros," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1193-1202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darcy Steeg Morris & Kimberly F. Sellers, 2022. "A Flexible Mixed Model for Clustered Count Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Baksh, M. Fazil & Böhning, Dankmar & Lerdsuwansri, Rattana, 2011. "An extension of an over-dispersion test for count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 466-474, January.
    3. S. Hadi Khazraee & Antonio Jose Sáez‐Castillo & Srinivas Reddy Geedipally & Dominique Lord, 2015. "Application of the Hyper‐Poisson Generalized Linear Model for Analyzing Motor Vehicle Crashes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 919-930, May.
    4. Isihara, Paul & Shi, Chaojun & Ward, Jonathan & O'Malley, Leo & Laney, Skyler & Diedrichs, Danilo & Flores, Gabriel, 2020. "Identifying most typical and most ideal attribute levels in small populations of expert decision makers: Studying the Go/No Go decision of disaster relief organizations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    5. Kimberly F. Sellers & Andrew W. Swift & Kimberly S. Weems, 2017. "A flexible distribution class for count data," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Wang, Fan & Li, Heng & Dong, Chao, 2021. "Understanding near-miss count data on construction sites using greedy D-vine copula marginal regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Zhou, Can & Jiao, Yan & Browder, Joan, 2019. "K-aggregated transformation of discrete distributions improves modeling count data with excess ones," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Shital A. Thekdi & James H. Lambert, 2012. "Decision Analysis and Risk Models for Land Development Affecting Infrastructure Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(7), pages 1253-1269, July.
    9. Özkan Uğurlu & Serdar Yıldız & Sean Loughney & Jin Wang & Shota Kuntchulia & Irakli Sharabidze, 2020. "Analyzing Collision, Grounding, and Sinking Accidents Occurring in the Black Sea Utilizing HFACS and Bayesian Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2610-2638, December.
    10. Kong, Maiying & Xu, Sheng & Levy, Steven M. & Datta, Somnath, 2015. "GEE type inference for clustered zero-inflated negative binomial regression with application to dental caries," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 54-66.
    11. Nasim Vahabi & Anoshirvan Kazemnejad & Somnath Datta, 2018. "A Marginalized Overdispersed Location Scale Model for Clustered Ordinal Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(1), pages 103-134, December.
    12. Sim Shin Zhu & Gupta Ramesh C. & Ong Seng Huat, 2018. "Zero-inflated Conway-Maxwell Poisson Distribution to Analyze Discrete Data," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Jun Yang & Min Xie & Thong Ngee Goh, 2011. "Outlier identification and robust parameter estimation in a zero-inflated Poisson model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 421-430, October.
    14. Lim, Hwa Kyung & Song, Juwon & Jung, Byoung Cheol, 2013. "Score tests for zero-inflation and overdispersion in two-level count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 67-82.
    15. Seyed Ehsan Saffari & John Carson Allen & Robiah Adnan & Seng Huat Ong & Shin Zhu Sim & William Greene, 2019. "Frequency of Visiting a Doctor: A right Truncated Count Regression Model with Excess Zeros," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 9(5), pages 112-122, August.
    16. Boris Forthmann & Philipp Doebler, 2021. "Reliability of researcher capacity estimates and count data dispersion: a comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and Conway-Maxwell-Poisson models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3337-3354, April.
    17. Dominique Lord & Srinivas Reddy Geedipally & Seth D. Guikema, 2010. "Extension of the Application of Conway‐Maxwell‐Poisson Models: Analyzing Traffic Crash Data Exhibiting Underdispersion," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(8), pages 1268-1276, August.
    18. Kimberly F. Sellers & Tong Li & Yixuan Wu & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan, 2021. "A Flexible Multivariate Distribution for Correlated Count Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Royce A. Francis & Srinivas Reddy Geedipally & Seth D. Guikema & Soma Sekhar Dhavala & Dominique Lord & Sarah LaRocca, 2012. "Characterizing the Performance of the Conway‐Maxwell Poisson Generalized Linear Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 167-183, January.
    20. Young Bae & Byung-Deuk Woo & Sungwon Jung & Eunchae Lee & Jiin Lee & Mingu Lee & Haegyun Park, 2023. "The Relationship Between Government Response Speed and Sentiments of Public Complaints: Empirical Evidence From Big Data on Public Complaints in South Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sankhb:v:83:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s13571-020-00229-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.