IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v47y2013i1p27-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alarm the quickly changing of performance evaluation decisive indexes—qualitative to quantitative?

Author

Listed:
  • He Jian-Long
  • Shi Zhong-Ke

Abstract

This paper research about a special phenomenon and what is the main fators which is decided the evaluation total scores of local government in diferent years of China. The contents of the paper included introduction, hypothesis and research methodology, data and quantitative model, editing data, analyzing data, data showed and conclusion. The paper tests the new hypothesis of the quantitative evaluation, and it is right that new public policy and its tools of public management are effectively in China, so the situation is changed that the quantitative evaluation becomes the decisive factor in the performance total score by the model of original evaluation data analysis. The following public policy is effective in the year of China local government: the new public policy increases strength of evaluation; the new public policy deal with the weakness of evaluation before 2009; make new public policy to fight threats of evaluation; and make new policy for opportunities of evaluation. The paper also tests the hypothesis of the quantitative evaluations and which fator is positive correlated with results of performance, the quantitative evaluation is the decisive factors of evaluation scores in local governments of China by the years of changing. This paper research about the ratio of quantitative scores and the relationship between different fators of Chinese-style performance evaluation, and the data showing that the caves of related fators are almost the same level, it is proved that the reason of the qualitative scores become the negative correlation factors of performance score after 2009. At last, the paper builds the evaluation model by econometrics and thinking about performance evaluation practice of Chinese local governments as following: $${\begin{array}{ll}Y=0.23+0.81_{1} Y_{1} -0.18Y_{2} +0.44Y_{3} +0.01Y_{4} +e_{t2}\\ \hspace*{2.7pc}(0.35) \hspace*{1.2pc}(0.07) \hspace*{1.2pc} (0.05)\hspace*{1.2pc} (0.06) \hspace*{1.2pc} (0.0003)\\ \hspace*{6pc}{N}={12\quad R^2}=0.99\end{array}}$$ The value of constant 0.23 means Y = exp 0.23 × 10 9 while every variable goes back to zero. The value of Y will be increase 0.81%, −0.18%, 0.44%, 0.01% while Y 1 , Y 2 , Y 3 , Y 4 increase 1%, and the prefer condition is that the other variables are not change. The article shows a changing map of performance evaluation in China. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • He Jian-Long & Shi Zhong-Ke, 2013. "Alarm the quickly changing of performance evaluation decisive indexes—qualitative to quantitative?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 27-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:1:p:27-37
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9482-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-011-9482-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-011-9482-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Qijun, 2007. "How to improve government performance?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1198-1206, December.
    2. Breitbarth, Tim & Mitchell, Rob & Lawson, Rob, 2010. "Service performance measurement in a New Zealand local government organization," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 397-403, July.
    3. Mendoza, Meyra Sebello & Farris, Paul L., 1992. "The impact of changes in government policies on economic performance (the ARCH model)," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 209-220, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahito, Jam Ghulam Murtaza, 2015. "Market integration of wheat in Pakistan," Discussion Papers 72, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    2. Seghezza, Elena & Morelli, Pierluigi & Pittaluga, Giovanni B., 2017. "Reserve accumulation and exchange rate policy in China: The authoritarian elite's aim of political survival," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-51.
    3. Kahana, Nava & Qijun, Liu, 2010. "Endemic corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 82-88, March.
    4. Jennings, Colin, 2011. "The good, the bad and the populist: A model of political agency with emotional voters," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 611-624.
    5. Jason Hackworth, 2009. "Normalizing ‘Solutions’ to ‘Government Failure’: Media Representations of Habitat for Humanity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(11), pages 2686-2705, November.
    6. Muhammad Umar Bello & David Martin @ Daud Juanil & Rozilah Kasim & Muhammad Najib Razali & Yunos Ngadiman & Talib Bon, 2018. "Evidence of Municipal Awareness as a Construct for Enhancing Citizen Satisfaction in Municipal Council of Malaysia," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 4(2), pages 1001-1012, February.
    7. Badiane, Ousmane & Ulimwengu, John M. & Wouterse, Fleur, 2010. "Spatial price transmission and market integration in Senegal’s groundnut market," IFPRI discussion papers 1014, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:1:p:27-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.