IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v34y2016i11d10.1007_s40273-016-0428-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition Between Biosimilars and Patented Biologics: Learning from European and Japanese Experience

Author

Listed:
  • François Bocquet

    (Paris Descartes University
    Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris Descartes University
    Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

  • Anaïs Loubière

    (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

  • Isabelle Fusier

    (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

  • Anne-Laure Cordonnier

    (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

  • Pascal Paubel

    (Paris Descartes University
    Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris Descartes University
    Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP))

Abstract

Background The expiry of patents for costly biologics is creating new momentum on the pharmaceutical market for biosimilars (copies of off-patent biologics) and paving the way for their development. However, little is known about the competitiveness of biosimilars versus their originators and other biologics belonging to the same therapeutic class. Objective The main goal of this study was to analyse the type of competition generated by the first biosimilars commercialised on key global biologic markets and to grasp their economic model. The secondary goal was to distinguish the main factors likely to influence the uptake of biosimilars on national markets. Methods To be included in this study, countries had to meet three conditions: the regulatory framework for the development of biosimilars closely resembled that in Europe, biosimilars were marketed in 2014, and the value of the biologics market was >US$3 billion. We analysed granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSFs) and erythropoietins (EPOs) over the period 2007–2014 because these are the two main therapeutic classes that have been ‘biosimilarised’ and thus have many years of experience available. We assessed market sizes, retail/hospital distribution mixes, incentives for using biosimilars and price discounts for originators versus biosimilars. We conducted a linear regression analysis to assess the relationship between uptakes of biosimilars and the market shares of other biologics. Results The EU-5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) and Japanese GCSF and EPO markets are highly-country-specific. Uptake of biosimilars seems to depend on retail/hospital distribution mixes and on medical practice. Depending on the therapeutic class and the market sector (retail or hospital), biosimilars may compete with first-generation or second-generation products or both. Some incentives implemented to encourage the use of biosimilars had mixed results. Overall, discounts for biosimilars versus originators are not factors that determine global uptake of biosimilars. Conclusion Unlike generics, there appears to be no unique economic model for biosimilars. Moreover, a new phenomenon occurs with biosimilars: sometimes, they are able to take market shares from subsequent generations of biologics.

Suggested Citation

  • François Bocquet & Anaïs Loubière & Isabelle Fusier & Anne-Laure Cordonnier & Pascal Paubel, 2016. "Competition Between Biosimilars and Patented Biologics: Learning from European and Japanese Experience," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(11), pages 1173-1186, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:34:y:2016:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-016-0428-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0428-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-016-0428-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-016-0428-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Adrian Towse & Mikel Berdud, 2016. "Biosimilars: How Can Payers Get Long-Term Savings?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 609-616, June.
    2. Henry G. Grabowski & David B. Ridley & Kevin A. Schulman, 2007. "Entry and competition in generic biologics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4-5), pages 439-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katharina E. Blankart & Friederike Arndt, 2020. "Physician-Level Cost Control Measures and Regional Variation of Biosimilar Utilization in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Böhm, Anna-Katharina & Steiner, Isa Maria & Stargardt, Tom, 2023. "Market diffusion of biosimilars in off-patent biologic drug markets across Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toon van der Gronde & Carin A Uyl-de Groot & Toine Pieters, 2017. "Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: A systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Sabine Vogler & Valérie Paris & Alessandra Ferrario & Veronika J. Wirtz & Kees Joncheere & Peter Schneider & Hanne Bak Pedersen & Guillaume Dedet & Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, 2017. "How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 307-321, June.
    3. Fiona M. Scott Morton & Ariel Dora Stern & Scott Stern, 2018. "The Impact of the Entry of Biosimilars: Evidence from Europe," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(1), pages 173-210, August.
    4. Hye-Jae Lee & Euna Han & Hyero Kim, 2020. "Comparison of Utilization Trends between Biosimilars and Generics: Lessons from the Nationwide Claims Data in South Korea," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 557-566, August.
    5. Bruce Rasmussen, 2010. "Innovation and Commercialisation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13680.
    6. Katharina E. Blankart & Friederike Arndt, 2020. "Physician-Level Cost Control Measures and Regional Variation of Biosimilar Utilization in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Jaime Espin & Michael Schlander & Brian Godman & Pippa Anderson & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Isabelle Borget & Adam Hutchings & Steven Flostrand & Adam Parnaby & Claudio Jommi, 2018. "Projecting Pharmaceutical Expenditure in EU5 to 2021: Adjusting for the Impact of Discounts and Rebates," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 803-817, December.
    8. David B. Ridley & Chung-Ying Lee, 2020. "Does Medicare Reimbursement Drive Up Drug Launch Prices?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(5), pages 980-993, December.
    9. Arcidiacono, Peter & Ellickson, Paul B. & Landry, Peter & Ridley, David B., 2013. "Pharmaceutical followers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 538-553.
    10. Don Husereau & Brian Feagan & Carl Selya-Hammer, 2018. "Policy Options for Infliximab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Given Emerging Evidence for Switching," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 279-288, June.
    11. Gerard T. Vondeling & Qi Cao & Maarten J. Postma & Mark H. Rozenbaum, 2018. "The Impact of Patent Expiry on Drug Prices: A Systematic Literature Review," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 653-660, October.
    12. María-Isabel Farfan-Portet & Sophie Gerkens & Isabelle Lepage-Nefkens & Irmgard Vinck & Frank Hulstaert, 2014. "Are biosimilars the next tool to guarantee cost-containment for pharmaceutical expenditures?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(3), pages 223-228, April.
    13. Steven Simoens & Ira Jacobs & Robert Popovian & Leah Isakov & Lesley G. Shane, 2017. "Assessing the Value of Biosimilars: A Review of the Role of Budget Impact Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(10), pages 1047-1062, October.
    14. Alice M. Ellyson & Anirban Basu, 2021. "Do pharmaceutical prices rise anticipating branded competition?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1070-1081, May.
    15. Henry G. Grabowski, 2014. "Biosimilar Competition: Lessons from Europe and Prospects for the US," Seminar Briefing 001556, Office of Health Economics.
    16. Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Adrian Towse & Mikel Berdud, 2016. "Biosimilars: How Can Payers Get Long-Term Savings?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 609-616, June.
    17. François Bocquet & Pascal Paubel & Isabelle Fusier & Anne-Laure Cordonnier & Claude Pen & Martine Sinègre, 2014. "Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Uptakes in the EU-5 Markets: A Descriptive Analysis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 315-326, June.
    18. Mark Trusheim & Murray L. Aitken & Ernst R. Berndt, 2010. "Characterizing Markets for Biopharmaceutical Innovations: Do Biologics Differ from Small Molecules?," NBER Working Papers 16014, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Trusheim Mark R. & Aitken Murray L. & Berndt Ernst R., 2010. "Characterizing Markets for Biopharmaceutical Innovations: Do Biologics Differ from Small Molecules?," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-45, July.
    20. Böhm, Anna-Katharina & Steiner, Isa Maria & Stargardt, Tom, 2023. "Market diffusion of biosimilars in off-patent biologic drug markets across Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:34:y:2016:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-016-0428-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.