IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v57y2020i2d10.1007_s12597-019-00392-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoiding dissimilarity between the weights of the optimal DEA solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Dariush Akbarian

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

The zero weights in data envelopment analysis evaluation causes some problems such as ignoring the some inputs and/or outputs of DMUs under evaluation. Moreover, some authors claimed that the great differences in weights might be a problem. The aim of this paper is to extend the multiplier bound approach to avoid zero weights and great differences in the values of multipliers more. We show that our proposed model is equivalent to the type I assurance region model that will be used in the evaluation efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariush Akbarian, 2020. "Avoiding dissimilarity between the weights of the optimal DEA solutions," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(2), pages 364-375, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:57:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00392-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-019-00392-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-019-00392-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-019-00392-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V V Podinovski, 2004. "Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1311-1322, December.
    2. HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & ROSTAMY-MALKHALIFEH, Mohsen & AGRELL, Per J. & TAVANA , Madjid & MOHAMMADI, Fatemeh, 2015. "Extended Symmetric and Asymmetric Weight Assignment Methods in Data Envelopment Analysis," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2693, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2010. "A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 261-269, May.
    5. Boaz Golany, 1988. "Note---A Note on Including Ordinal Relations Among Multipliers in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(8), pages 1029-1033, August.
    6. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    7. Thompson, Russell G. & Langemeier, Larry N. & Lee, Chih-Tah & Lee, Euntaik & Thrall, Robert M., 1990. "The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 93-108.
    8. Dimitrov, Stanko & Sutton, Warren, 2010. "Promoting symmetric weight selection in data envelopment analysis: A penalty function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 281-288, January.
    9. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro & Javier Salinas-Jimenez & Peter Smith, 1997. "On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 215-230, May.
    2. Papaioannou, Grammatoula & Podinovski, Victor V., 2023. "Multicomponent production technologies with restricted allocations of shared inputs and outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 274-289.
    3. Podinovski, Victor V., 2016. "Optimal weights in DEA models with weight restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 916-924.
    4. Despotis, Dimitris K. & Stamati, Lamprini V. & Smirlis, Yiannis G., 2010. "Data envelopment analysis with nonlinear virtual inputs and outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 604-613, April.
    5. Lee, Seonghee & Lee, Hakyeon, 2015. "Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes: A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 942-953.
    6. Javier Fiallos & Jonathan Patrick & Wojtek Michalowski & Ken Farion, 2017. "Using data envelopment analysis for assessing the performance of pediatric emergency department physicians," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 129-140, March.
    7. T. Joro & E-J. Viitala, 1999. "The Efficiency of Public Forestry Organizations: A Comparison of Different Weight Restriction Approaches," Working Papers ir99059, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    8. Podinovski, Victor V. & Bouzdine-Chameeva, Tatiana, 2016. "On single-stage DEA models with weight restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1044-1050.
    9. Le, Minh Hanh & Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz, 2021. "Inverse Frontier-based Benchmarking for Investigating the Efficiency and Achieving the Targets in the Vietnamese Education System," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Lee, Hakyeon & Shin, Juneseuk, 2014. "Measuring journal performance for multidisciplinary research: An efficiency perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 77-88.
    11. Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano & Vicente J. Bolós, 2021. "deaR-Shiny: An Interactive Web App for Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. David Ennen & Irem Batool, 2017. "Airport Efficiency in Pakistan - A Data Envelopment Analysis with Weight Restrictions," Working Papers 25, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    13. Huang, Zhimin & Li, Susan X., 1996. "Dominance stochastic models in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 390-403, December.
    14. Podinovski, Victor V. & Bouzdine-Chameeva, Tatiana, 2015. "Consistent weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 201-209.
    15. António J. R. Santos & Sérgio P. Santos & Carla A. F. Amado & Efigénio L. Rebelo & Júlio C. Mendes, 2020. "Labor inspectorates’ efficiency and effectiveness assessment as a learning path to improve work-related accident prevention," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 609-651, May.
    16. Victor V. Podinovski & Tatiana Bouzdine-Chameeva, 2013. "Weight Restrictions and Free Production in Data Envelopment Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 426-437, April.
    17. Márcia N. F. Manoel & Sérgio P. Santos & Carla A. F. Amado, 2023. "Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on the performance of organ transplant services using data envelopment analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 217-237, June.
    18. Somayeh Razipour-GhalehJough & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Gholamreza Jahanshahloo & Mohsen Rostamy-malkhalifeh & Hamid Sharafi, 2020. "Finding closest target for bank branches in the presence of weight restrictions using data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 755-787, May.
    19. Ennen, David & Batool, Irem, 2018. "Airport efficiency in Pakistan - A Data Envelopment Analysis with weight restrictions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 205-212.
    20. Afsharian, Mohsen & Bogetoft, Peter, 2023. "Limiting flexibility in nonparametric efficiency evaluations: An ex post k-centroid clustering approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 633-647.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:57:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00392-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.