IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v49y2009i1p113-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A geotechnical investigation of the retrogressive Yaka Landslide and the debris flow threatening the town of Yaka (Isparta, SW Turkey)

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Özdemir
  • Mehmet Delikanli

Abstract

In this study the factors affecting the retrogressive Yaka Landslide, its mechanism and the hazard of debris flow on the town of Yaka are investigated. In the landslide area, the first landslide was small and occurred in March 2006 on the lower part of the Alaardıç Slope near the Gelendost District town of Yaka (Isparta, SW Turkey). The second, the Yaka Landslide, was large and occurred on 19 February 2007 in the soil-like marl on the central part of Alaardıç Slope. The geometry of the failure surface was circular and the depth of the failure surface was about 3 m. Following the landslide, a 85,800 m 3 of displaced material transformed to a debris flow. Then, the debris flow moved down the Eglence Valley, traveling a total distance of about 750 m. The town of Yaka is located 1,600 m downstream of Eglence Creek and hence poses a considerable risk of debris flow, should the creek be temporarily dammed as a result of further mass movement. Material from the debris accumulation has been deposited on the base of Eglence Valley and has formed a debris-dam lake behind a debris dam. Trees, agricultural areas, and weirs in the Eglence Creek have seen serious damage resulting from the debris flow. The slope angle, slope aspect and elevation of the area in this study were generated using a GIS-based digital elevation model (DEM). The stability of the Alaardıç Slope was assessed using limit equilibrium analysis with undrained peak and residual shear strength parameters. In the stability analyses, laboratory test results performed on the soil-like marls were used. It was determined that the Alaardıç Slope is found to be stable under dry conditions and unstable under completely saturated conditions. The Alaardıç Slope and its vicinity is a paleolandslide area, and there the factor of safety for sliding was found to be about 1.0 under saturated conditions. The Alaardıç Slope and the deposited earthen materials in Eglence Creek could easily be triggered into movement by any factors or combination of factors, such as prolonged or heavy rainfall, snowmelt or an earthquake. It was established that the depth of the debris flow initiated on the Yaka Landslide reached up to 8 m in Eglence Creek at the point it is 20 m wide. If this deposited material in Eglence Creek is set into motion, the canal that passes through Yaka, with its respective width and depth of 7 and 1.45 m, could not possibly discharge the flow. The destruction or spillover of this canal in Yaka could bring catastrophic loss to residents which are located within 3–5 m of the bank of the canal. Furthermore, if material present in the landslide source area slides and this displaced material puts pressure on the unstable deposited material in Eglence Creek, even more catastrophic loss would occur to the town of Yaka. In this study, it was determined that debris flows are still a major hazard to Yaka and its population of 3,000. The results provided in this study could help citizens, planners, and engineers to reduce losses caused by existing and future landslides and debris flow in rainfall and snowmelt conditions by means of prevention and mitigation. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Özdemir & Mehmet Delikanli, 2009. "A geotechnical investigation of the retrogressive Yaka Landslide and the debris flow threatening the town of Yaka (Isparta, SW Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 49(1), pages 113-136, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:49:y:2009:i:1:p:113-136
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-008-9282-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-008-9282-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-008-9282-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dieter Rickenmann, 1999. "Empirical Relationships for Debris Flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 19(1), pages 47-77, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. Chandrasekaran & R. Sayed Owaise & S. Ashwin & Rayansh Jain & S. Prasanth & R. Venugopalan, 2013. "Investigation on infrastructural damages by rainfall-induced landslides during November 2009 in Nilgiris, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 1535-1557, February.
    2. Chen Cao & Peihua Xu & Jianping Chen & Lianjing Zheng & Cencen Niu, 2016. "Hazard Assessment of Debris-Flow along the Baicha River in Heshigten Banner, Inner Mongolia, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Chong Xu & Xiwei Xu & Fuchu Dai & Zhide Wu & Honglin He & Feng Shi & Xiyan Wu & Suning Xu, 2013. "Application of an incomplete landslide inventory, logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping related to the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 883-900, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Gentile & Tiziana Bisantino & Giuliana Trisorio Liuzzi, 2008. "Debris-flow risk analysis in south Gargano watersheds (Southern-Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 44(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    3. Khattri, Khim B. & Pudasaini, Shiva P., 2019. "Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 280-305.
    4. Raquel Melo & José Luís Zêzere, 2017. "Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1373-1407, September.
    5. M. Jakob & D. Stein & M. Ulmi, 2012. "Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 241-261, January.
    6. Katrin Sieron & Lucia Capra & Sergio Rodríguez-Elizararrás, 2014. "Hazard assessment at San Martín volcano based on geological record, numerical modeling, and spatial analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 275-297, January.
    7. Vinicius Queiroz Veloso & Fabio Augusto Vieira Gomes Reis & Victor Cabral & José Eduardo Zaine & Claudia Vanessa Santos Corrêa & Marcelo Fischer Gramani & Caiubi Emmanuel Kuhn, 2023. "Hazard assessment of debris-flow-prone watersheds in Cubatão, São Paulo State, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3119-3138, April.
    8. Anna Ferrero & Maria Migliazza & Marina Pirulli, 2015. "Advance survey and modelling technologies for the study of the slope stability in an Alpine basin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 303-326, March.
    9. G. Chevalier & V. Medina & M. Hürlimann & A. Bateman, 2013. "Debris-flow susceptibility analysis using fluvio-morphological parameters and data mining: application to the Central-Eastern Pyrenees," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 213-238, June.
    10. Chao Ma & Kaiheng Hu & Mi Tian, 2013. "Comparison of debris-flow volume and activity under different formation conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 261-273, June.
    11. Gerardo Grelle & Antonietta Rossi & Paola Revellino & Luigi Guerriero & Francesco Maria Guadagno & Giuseppe Sappa, 2019. "Assessment of Debris-Flow Erosion and Deposit Areas by Morphometric Analysis and a GIS-Based Simplified Procedure: A Case Study of Paupisi in the Southern Apennines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Veniamin Perov & Sergey Chernomorets & Olga Budarina & Elena Savernyuk & Tatiana Leontyeva, 2017. "Debris flow hazards for mountain regions of Russia: regional features and key events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 199-235, August.
    13. Der-Guey Lin & Sen-Yen Hsu & Kuang-Tsung Chang, 2009. "Numerical simulations of flow motion and deposition characteristics of granular debris flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(3), pages 623-650, September.
    14. Martin Mergili & Wolfgang Fellin & Stella Moreiras & Johann Stötter, 2012. "Simulation of debris flows in the Central Andes based on Open Source GIS: possibilities, limitations, and parameter sensitivity," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(3), pages 1051-1081, April.
    15. Xiaojun Guo & Xingchang Chen & Guohu Song & Jianqi Zhuang & Jianglin Fan, 2021. "Debris flows in the Lushan earthquake area: formation characteristics, rainfall conditions, and evolutionary tendency," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2663-2687, April.
    16. Sven Fuchs & Margreth Keiler & Sergey Sokratov & Alexander Shnyparkov, 2013. "Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(3), pages 1217-1241, September.
    17. Ruoshen Lin & Gang Mei & Ziyang Liu & Ning Xi & Xiaona Zhang, 2021. "Susceptibility Analysis of Glacier Debris Flow by Investigating the Changes in Glaciers Based on Remote Sensing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    19. P. Champati Ray & Shovan Chattoraj & M. Bisht & Suresh Kannaujiya & Kamal Pandey & Ajanta Goswami, 2016. "Kedarnath disaster 2013: causes and consequences using remote sensing inputs," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 227-243, March.
    20. D. Dorta & G. Toyos & C. Oppenheimer & M. Pareschi & R. Sulpizio & G. Zanchetta, 2007. "Empirical modelling of the May 1998 small debris flows in Sarno (Italy) using LAHARZ," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 40(2), pages 381-396, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:49:y:2009:i:1:p:113-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.