IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metron/v72y2014i2p217-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating multicollinearity with spike-and-slab priors

Author

Listed:
  • Veronika Ročková
  • Edward George

Abstract

In multiple regression under the normal linear model, the presence of multicollinearity is well known to lead to unreliable and unstable maximum likelihood estimates. This can be particularly troublesome for the problem of variable selection where it becomes more difficult to distinguish between subset models. Here we show how adding a spike-and-slab prior mitigates this difficulty by filtering the likelihood surface into a posterior distribution that allocates the relevant likelihood information to each of the subset model modes. For identification of promising high posterior models in this setting, we consider three EM algorithms, the fast closed form EMVS version of Rockova and George (J Am Stat Assoc, 2014 ) and two new versions designed for variants of the spike-and-slab formulation. For a multimodal posterior under multicollinearity, we compare the regions of convergence of these three algorithms. Deterministic annealing versions of the EMVS algorithm are seen to substantially mitigate this multimodality. A single simple running example is used for illustration throughout. Copyright Sapienza Università di Roma 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Veronika Ročková & Edward George, 2014. "Negotiating multicollinearity with spike-and-slab priors," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 72(2), pages 217-229, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:72:y:2014:i:2:p:217-229
    DOI: 10.1007/s40300-014-0047-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s40300-014-0047-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40300-014-0047-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronika Ročková & Edward I. George, 2014. "EMVS: The EM Approach to Bayesian Variable Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 828-846, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Obryan Poyser, 2017. "Exploring the determinants of Bitcoin's price: an application of Bayesian Structural Time Series," Papers 1706.01437, arXiv.org.
    2. Ramírez-Hassan, Andrés & Carvajal-Rendón, Daniela A., 2021. "Specification uncertainty in modeling internet adoption: A developing city case analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Jetter, Michael & Mahmood, Rafat & Parmeter, Christopher F. & Ramirez Hassan, Andres, 2020. "Explaining Post-Cold-War Civil Conflict among 17 Billion Models: The Importance of History and Religion," IZA Discussion Papers 13511, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Obryan Poyser, 2019. "Exploring the dynamics of Bitcoin’s price: a Bayesian structural time series approach," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 29-60, March.
    5. Sudhanshu K. MISHRA, 2016. "Shapley Value Regression and the Resolution of Multicollinearity," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 498-515, September.
    6. Jetter, Michael & Mahmood, Rafat & Parmeter, Christopher F. & Ramírez-Hassan, Andrés, 2022. "Post-Cold War civil conflict and the role of history and religion: A stochastic search variable selection approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernardi, Mauro & Costola, Michele, 2019. "High-dimensional sparse financial networks through a regularised regression model," SAFE Working Paper Series 244, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    2. Gonzalo García-Donato & María Eugenia Castellanos & Alicia Quirós, 2021. "Bayesian Variable Selection with Applications in Health Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Dimitris Korobilis & Davide Pettenuzzo, 2020. "Machine Learning Econometrics: Bayesian algorithms and methods," Working Papers 2020_09, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    4. Dufays, Arnaud & Rombouts, Jeroen V.K., 2020. "Relevant parameter changes in structural break models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 46-78.
    5. Zhao, Kaifeng & Lian, Heng, 2016. "The Expectation–Maximization approach for Bayesian quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Posch, Konstantin & Arbeiter, Maximilian & Pilz, Juergen, 2020. "A novel Bayesian approach for variable selection in linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Dimitris Korobilis & Kenichi Shimizu, 2022. "Bayesian Approaches to Shrinkage and Sparse Estimation," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 11(4), pages 230-354, June.
    8. Felix Abramovich & Vadim Grinshtein, 2013. "Estimation of a sparse group of sparse vectors," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(2), pages 355-370.
    9. Uddin, Md Nazir & Gaskins, Jeremy T., 2023. "Shared Bayesian variable shrinkage in multinomial logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Latouche, Pierre & Mattei, Pierre-Alexandre & Bouveyron, Charles & Chiquet, Julien, 2016. "Combining a relaxed EM algorithm with Occam’s razor for Bayesian variable selection in high-dimensional regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 177-190.
    11. Naveen Naidu Narisetty, 2020. "Discussion," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 330-334, August.
    12. Jack Jewson & Li Li & Laura Battaglia & Stephen Hansen & David Rossell & Piotr Zwiernik, 2022. "Graphical model inference with external network data," CeMMAP working papers 20/22, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Veronika Ročková & Edward I. George, 2016. "Fast Bayesian Factor Analysis via Automatic Rotations to Sparsity," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1608-1622, October.
    14. Li Ma, 2015. "Scalable Bayesian Model Averaging Through Local Information Propagation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 795-809, June.
    15. Yi Liu & Veronika Ročková & Yuexi Wang, 2021. "Variable selection with ABC Bayesian forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(3), pages 453-481, July.
    16. M. Marsman & K. Huth & L. J. Waldorp & I. Ntzoufras, 2022. "Objective Bayesian Edge Screening and Structure Selection for Ising Networks," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 47-82, March.
    17. Xingqi Du & Subhashis Ghosal, 2018. "Bayesian Discriminant Analysis Using a High Dimensional Predictor," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 80(1), pages 112-145, December.
    18. Zhang, Chun-Xia & Xu, Shuang & Zhang, Jiang-She, 2019. "A novel variational Bayesian method for variable selection in logistic regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-19.
    19. Zhou, Haiming & Huang, Xianzheng, 2022. "Bayesian beta regression for bounded responses with unknown supports," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Wenjing Yin & Sihai Dave Zhao & Feng Liang, 2022. "Bayesian penalized Buckley-James method for high dimensional bivariate censored regression models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 282-318, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:72:y:2014:i:2:p:217-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.