IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v23y2021i3d10.1007_s11009-020-09797-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized Evolutionary Point Processes: Model Specifications and Model Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Philip A. White

    (Brigham Young University)

  • Alan E. Gelfand

    (Duke University)

Abstract

Generalized evolutionary point processes offer a class of point process models that allows for either excitation or inhibition based upon the history of the process. In this regard, we propose modeling which comprises generalization of the nonlinear Hawkes process. Working within a Bayesian framework, model fitting is implemented through Markov chain Monte Carlo. This entails discussion of computation of the likelihood for such point patterns. Furthermore, for this class of models, we discuss strategies for model comparison. Using simulation, we illustrate how well we can distinguish these models from point pattern specifications with conditionally independent event times, e.g., Poisson processes. Specifically, we demonstrate that these models can correctly identify true relationships (i.e., excitation or inhibition/control). Then, we consider a novel extension of the log Gaussian Cox process that incorporates evolutionary behavior and illustrate that our model comparison approach prefers the evolutionary log Gaussian Cox process compared to simpler models. We also examine a real dataset consisting of violent crime events from the 11th police district in Chicago from the year 2018. This data exhibits strong daily seasonality and changes across the year. After we account for these data attributes, we find significant but mild self-excitation, implying that event occurrence increases the intensity of future events.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip A. White & Alan E. Gelfand, 2021. "Generalized Evolutionary Point Processes: Model Specifications and Model Comparison," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1001-1021, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:23:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-020-09797-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-020-09797-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-020-09797-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-020-09797-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen, 2013. "Bayesian Inference for Hawkes Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 623-642, September.
    2. P. A. White & E. Porcu, 2019. "Nonseparable covariance models on circles cross time: A study of Mexico City ozone," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), August.
    3. Yosihiko Ogata, 1998. "Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 50(2), pages 379-402, June.
    4. Jonathan W. Pillow & Jonathon Shlens & Liam Paninski & Alexander Sher & Alan M. Litke & E. J. Chichilnisky & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2008. "Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7207), pages 995-999, August.
    5. Mohler, G. O. & Short, M. B. & Brantingham, P. J. & Schoenberg, F. P. & Tita, G. E., 2011. "Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 100-108.
    6. Felipe Gerhard & Moritz Deger & Wilson Truccolo, 2017. "On the stability and dynamics of stochastic spiking neuron models: Nonlinear Hawkes process and point process GLMs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, February.
    7. Gneiting, Tilmann & Raftery, Adrian E., 2007. "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 359-378, March.
    8. Isham, Valerie & Westcott, Mark, 1979. "A self-correcting point process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 335-347, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chevallier, Julien, 2017. "Mean-field limit of generalized Hawkes processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(12), pages 3870-3912.
    2. Dewei Wang & Chendi Jiang & Chanseok Park, 2019. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing systems with memory," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 341-360, April.
    3. Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Lu, Ye & Rahbek, Anders & Stærk-Østergaard, Jacob, 2023. "Bootstrap inference for Hawkes and general point processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 133-165.
    4. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    5. Sebastian Meyer & Johannes Elias & Michael Höhle, 2012. "A Space–Time Conditional Intensity Model for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Occurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 607-616, June.
    6. Lizhen Xu & Jason A. Duan & Andrew Whinston, 2014. "Path to Purchase: A Mutually Exciting Point Process Model for Online Advertising and Conversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1392-1412, June.
    7. Santitissadeekorn, Naratip & Lloyd, David J.B. & Short, Martin B. & Delahaies, Sylvain, 2020. "Approximate filtering of conditional intensity process for Poisson count data: Application to urban crime," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Vipul Aggarwal & Elina H. Hwang & Yong Tan, 2021. "Learning to Be Creative: A Mutually Exciting Spatiotemporal Point Process Model for Idea Generation in Open Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1214-1235, December.
    9. Frederic Paik Schoenberg & Marc Hoffmann & Ryan J. Harrigan, 2019. "A recursive point process model for infectious diseases," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1271-1287, October.
    10. Naveed Chehrazi & Thomas A. Weber, 2015. "Dynamic Valuation of Delinquent Credit-Card Accounts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3077-3096, December.
    11. Giada Adelfio & Marcello Chiodi, 2021. "Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 947-971, September.
    12. Gresnigt, Francine & Kole, Erik & Franses, Philip Hans, 2015. "Interpreting financial market crashes as earthquakes: A new Early Warning System for medium term crashes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 123-139.
    13. Jakob Gulddahl Rasmussen, 2013. "Bayesian Inference for Hawkes Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 623-642, September.
    14. Emilio Porcu & Philip A. White, 2022. "Random fields on the hypertorus: Covariance modeling and applications," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), February.
    15. Stindl, Tom & Chen, Feng, 2018. "Likelihood based inference for the multivariate renewal Hawkes process," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 131-145.
    16. Alex Reinhart & Joel Greenhouse, 2018. "Self‐exciting point processes with spatial covariates: modelling the dynamics of crime," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1305-1329, November.
    17. Eric W. Fox & Martin B. Short & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Kathryn D. Coronges & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2016. "Modeling E-mail Networks and Inferring Leadership Using Self-Exciting Point Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 564-584, April.
    18. Liu, Chenguang, 2020. "Statistical inference for a partially observed interacting system of Hawkes processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(9), pages 5636-5694.
    19. Nishio, Kazuki & Hoshino, Takahiro, 2022. "Joint modeling of effects of customer tier program on customer purchase duration and purchase amount," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Peter Boyd & James Molyneux, 2021. "Assessing the contagiousness of mass shootings with nonparametric Hawkes processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:23:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-020-09797-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.