IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v20y2018i2d10.1007_s11009-017-9582-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Phase II Comparative Clinical Trials with Two Endpoints and Penalty for Adverse Events

Author

Listed:
  • Sotiris Bersimis

    (University of Piraeus)

  • Athanasios Sachlas

    (University of Piraeus)

  • Takis Papaioannou

    (University of Piraeus)

Abstract

Adverse events in Phase II comparative clinical trials have received limited attention in the literature. Bersimis et al. (Stat Med 34:197–214, 2014) in proposed a class of comparative sequential designs with bivariate endpoints, where as a special case, the termination of the clinical trial due to the occurrence of a severe adverse event is treated. In this paper, using the Markov chain embedding technique, we extend this class of designs proposing two new designs, which treat cases where the development of an adverse event does not immediately stop the clinical trial, but penalizes appropriately the treatment that caused it. In both designs the penalty can be chosen either by assessing the severity of the adverse event or by optimizing the power. The numerical results show an excellent performance, achieving small expected sample sizes in conjunction with large values for power, satisfying in this way the ethical requirement for small sample sizes and fast decisions in clinical practice. The formulation of the procedure as a stochastic process is elegantly accomplished while it offers the necessary mathematical framework for further generalizing the designs covering more cases such as group sequential designs, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotiris Bersimis & Athanasios Sachlas & Takis Papaioannou, 2018. "Monitoring Phase II Comparative Clinical Trials with Two Endpoints and Penalty for Adverse Events," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 719-738, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-017-9582-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-017-9582-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-017-9582-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-017-9582-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter F. Thall & Su-Chun Chengt, 1999. "Treatment Comparisons Based on Two-Dimensional Safety and Efficacy Alternatives in Oncology Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 746-753, September.
    2. Peter F. Thall & Leiko H. Wooten & Elizabeth J. Shpall, 2006. "A Geometric Approach to Comparing Treatments for Rapidly Fatal Diseases," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 193-201, March.
    3. Salvan, Alessandra, 1990. "Planning sequential clinical trials: A review," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 47-56, January.
    4. Pryseley, Assam & Tilahun, Abel & Alonso, Ariel & Molenberghs, Geert, 2010. "Using earlier measures in a longitudinal sequence as a potential surrogate for a later one," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1342-1354, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guosheng Yin & Yisheng Li & Yuan Ji, 2006. "Bayesian Dose-Finding in Phase I/II Clinical Trials Using Toxicity and Efficacy Odds Ratios," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 777-787, September.
    2. Sengupta, Raghu Nandan & Sengupta, Angana, 2011. "Some variants of adaptive sampling procedures and their applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3183-3196, December.
    3. Peter F. Thall & Leiko H. Wooten & Elizabeth J. Shpall, 2006. "A Geometric Approach to Comparing Treatments for Rapidly Fatal Diseases," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 193-201, March.
    4. Peter F. Thall & Hoang Q. Nguyen & Elihu H. Estey, 2008. "Patient-Specific Dose Finding Based on Bivariate Outcomes and Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1126-1136, December.
    5. Denis Agniel & Layla Parast, 2021. "Evaluation of longitudinal surrogate markers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 477-489, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:20:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-017-9582-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.