IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v176y2018i3d10.1007_s10957-018-1235-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraint Qualifications and Proper Pareto Optimality Conditions for Multiobjective Problems with Equilibrium Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Zhang

    (Shanghai University)

  • Jin Zhang

    (Hong Kong Baptist University)

  • Gui-Hua Lin

    (Shanghai University)

  • Xinmin Yang

    (Chongqing Normal University)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a class of multiobjective problems with equilibrium constraints. Our first task is to extend the existing constraint qualifications for mathematical problems with equilibrium constraints from the single-objective case to the multiobjective case, and our second task is to derive some stationarity conditions under the proper Pareto sense for the considered problem. After doing that, we devote ourselves to investigating the relationships among the extended constraint qualifications and the proper Pareto stationarity conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Zhang & Jin Zhang & Gui-Hua Lin & Xinmin Yang, 2018. "Constraint Qualifications and Proper Pareto Optimality Conditions for Multiobjective Problems with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 763-782, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:176:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-018-1235-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-018-1235-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-018-1235-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-018-1235-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Guo & Gui-Hua Lin, 2013. "Notes on Some Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 600-616, March.
    2. Lin, Gui-Hua & Zhang, Dali & Liang, Yan-Chao, 2013. "Stochastic multiobjective problems with complementarity constraints and applications in healthcare management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 461-470.
    3. Siddiqui, Sauleh & Christensen, Adam, 2016. "Determining energy and climate market policy using multiobjective programs with equilibrium constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 316-325.
    4. G. Giorgi & B. Jiménez & V. Novo, 2009. "Strong Kuhn–Tucker conditions and constraint qualifications in locally Lipschitz multiobjective optimization problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 288-304, December.
    5. Jane J. Ye & Jin Zhang, 2014. "Enhanced Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Conditions for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 777-794, December.
    6. M.L. Flegel & C. Kanzow, 2005. "Abadie-Type Constraint Qualification for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 595-614, March.
    7. Jane J. Ye, 2011. "Necessary Optimality Conditions for Multiobjective Bilevel Programs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 165-184, February.
    8. A. Moldovan & L. Pellegrini, 2009. "On Regularity for Constrained Extremum Problems. Part 1: Sufficient Optimality Conditions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 147-163, July.
    9. Regina S. Burachik & M. M. Rizvi, 2012. "On Weak and Strong Kuhn–Tucker Conditions for Smooth Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 477-491, November.
    10. X. F. Li & J. Z. Zhang, 2005. "Stronger Kuhn-Tucker Type Conditions in Nonsmooth Multiobjective Optimization: Locally Lipschitz Case," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 367-388, November.
    11. A. Moldovan & L. Pellegrini, 2009. "On Regularity for Constrained Extremum Problems. Part 2: Necessary Optimality Conditions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 165-183, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Savin Treanţă & Balendu Bhooshan Upadhyay & Arnav Ghosh & Kamsing Nonlaopon, 2022. "Optimality Conditions for Multiobjective Mathematical Programming Problems with Equilibrium Constraints on Hadamard Manifolds," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Gabriel Haeser & Alberto Ramos, 2020. "Constraint Qualifications for Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Conditions in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 469-487, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen Huy Chieu & Gue Myung Lee, 2014. "Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints and their Local Preservation Property," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 755-776, December.
    2. Min Feng & Shengjie Li & Jie Wang, 2022. "On Tucker-Type Alternative Theorems and Necessary Optimality Conditions for Nonsmooth Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 480-503, November.
    3. Peng Zhang & Jin Zhang & Gui-Hua Lin & Xinmin Yang, 2019. "New Constraint Qualifications for S-Stationarity for MPEC with Nonsmooth Objective," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(02), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Manxue You & Shengjie Li, 2017. "Separation Functions and Optimality Conditions in Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 527-544, November.
    5. Lei Guo & Jin Zhang & Gui-Hua Lin, 2014. "New Results on Constraint Qualifications for Nonlinear Extremum Problems and Extensions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 737-754, December.
    6. Yogendra Pandey & Shashi Kant Mishra, 2016. "Duality for Nonsmooth Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints, Using Convexificators," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 694-707, November.
    7. Lili Pan & Ziyan Luo & Naihua Xiu, 2017. "Restricted Robinson Constraint Qualification and Optimality for Cardinality-Constrained Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 104-118, October.
    8. Balendu Bhooshan Upadhyay & Arnav Ghosh, 2023. "On Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programming Problems with Vanishing Constraints on Hadamard Manifolds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 1-35, October.
    9. Letizia Pellegrini & Shengkun Zhu, 2018. "Constrained Extremum Problems, Regularity Conditions and Image Space Analysis. Part II: The Vector Finite-Dimensional Case," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 788-810, June.
    10. Leonid Minchenko, 2019. "Note on Mangasarian–Fromovitz-Like Constraint Qualifications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 1199-1204, September.
    11. L. Minchenko & A. Tarakanov, 2011. "On Error Bounds for Quasinormal Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 571-579, March.
    12. M. Alavi Hejazi & N. Movahedian & S. Nobakhtian, 2018. "On Constraint Qualifications and Sensitivity Analysis for General Optimization Problems via Pseudo-Jacobians," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 778-799, December.
    13. Elena Constantin, 2020. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Locally Lipschitz Inequality-Constrained Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 50-67, July.
    14. S. J. Li & Y. D. Xu & S. K. Zhu, 2012. "Nonlinear Separation Approach to Constrained Extremum Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 842-856, September.
    15. Lei Guo & Gui-Hua Lin, 2013. "Notes on Some Constraint Qualifications for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 600-616, March.
    16. Jane J. Ye & Jin Zhang, 2014. "Enhanced Karush–Kuhn–Tucker Conditions for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 777-794, December.
    17. Y. D. Xu & S. J. Li, 2013. "Optimality Conditions for Generalized Ky Fan Quasi-Inequalities with Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 663-684, June.
    18. Andreani, R. & Júdice, J.J. & Martínez, J.M. & Martini, T., 2016. "Feasibility problems with complementarity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 41-54.
    19. Satoshi Suzuki & Daishi Kuroiwa, 2012. "Necessary and Sufficient Constraint Qualification for Surrogate Duality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 366-377, February.
    20. Kerstin Dächert & Sauleh Siddiqui & Javier Saez-Gallego & Steven A. Gabriel & Juan Miguel Morales, 2019. "A Bicriteria Perspective on L-Penalty Approaches – a Corrigendum to Siddiqui and Gabriel’s L-Penalty Approach for Solving MPECs," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1199-1214, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:176:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-018-1235-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.