IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i8d10.1007_s10845-015-1166-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-stage satisfaction index estimation model integrating structural equation modeling and mathematical programming

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Aktepe

    (Kirikkale University)

  • Süleyman Ersöz

    (Kirikkale University)

  • Bilal Toklu

    (Gazi University)

Abstract

In this study, a satisfaction index estimation model is proposed integrating structural equation modeling and mathematical programming methods with fuzzy customer data. Firstly, a deep literature survey is conducted in this field of study. Then, a new model is proposed by taking into consideration gaps in the literature. The estimation model is composed of five stages and first stage is building conceptual model in which measurement and latent variables are introduced. At the second stage, a fuzzy evaluation method is developed for decreasing subjectivity in customer data. At the third stage, for measurement variables that are directly observed, a measurement model is developed with Linear Structural Relations. In the solution of the measurement model maximum likelihood algorithm is used. In the solution of structural model that is composed of latent variables that are not directly observed, a mathematical estimation model is developed in this study at the fourth stage. Mathematical model is coded in ILOG Cplex Optimization Studio. In the mathematical model that minimizes estimation errors, structural relations and measurement variable weights (precedence coefficients) are defined as constraints. At the fifth and last stage, index scores are calculated with mathematical model outputs. Application of the model is carried out in public sector at a local government service point. In the application model, service quality, innovation, communication, satisfaction and cost perception dimensions are used. Application results are discussed for both measurement and latent variables in detail. The results of model we developed are also compared with an alternative model outcomes and we show that we achieve optimum estimation capability with minimum estimation errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Aktepe & Süleyman Ersöz & Bilal Toklu, 2019. "A multi-stage satisfaction index estimation model integrating structural equation modeling and mathematical programming," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2945-2964, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1166-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1166-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1166-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1166-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hye-Seon Moon & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2005. "A fuzzy set theory approach to national composite S&T indices," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 64(1), pages 67-83, July.
    2. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2004. "A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: Some results from the transportation-communications sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 334-353, January.
    3. Amjad D. Al-Nasser & Mohammad Y. Al-Rawwash & Anas S. Alakhras, 2011. "An approach to setting up a national customer satisfaction index: the Jordan case study," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1977-1993, December.
    4. Liu, Xiaohong & Zeng, Xianyi & Xu, Yang & Koehl, Ludovic, 2008. "A fuzzy model of customer satisfaction index in e-commerce," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 512-521.
    5. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2002. "Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 148-170, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2010. "Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 163-172, March.
    2. Bérangère Gosse & Christian Hurson, 2016. "Assessment and improvement of employee job-satisfaction: a full-scale implementation of MUSA methodology on newly recruited personnel in a major French organisation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 657-675, December.
    3. Ismahene Aouadni & Abdelwaheb Rebai, 2017. "Decision support system based on genetic algorithm and multi-criteria satisfaction analysis (MUSA) method for measuring job satisfaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 3-20, September.
    4. Gabriela D. Oliveira & Luis C. Dias, 2020. "The potential learning effect of a MCDA approach on consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 767-787, October.
    5. Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha & Nunes, Alexandre Morais & Figueira, José Rui, 2021. "Customers satisfaction in pediatric inpatient services: A multiple criteria satisfaction analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Litos, Charalambos & Moustakis, Vassilis A. & Politis, Yannis & Tsironis, Loukas, 2008. "The assessment of user-perceived web quality: Application of a satisfaction benchmarking approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1346-1357, June.
    7. Chung-Yi Lin & Shu-Yi Liaw & Chao-Chun Chen & Mao-Yuan Pai & Yuh-Min Chen, 2017. "A computer-based approach for analyzing consumer demands in electronic word-of-mouth," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(3), pages 225-242, August.
    8. Aikaterini Zerva & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Evangelia Karasmanaki & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2021. "Multiple criteria analysis of citizens’ information and trust in climate change actions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7706-7727, May.
    9. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    10. Park, Han Woo & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2010. "Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 640-649, June.
    11. Evangelia Karasmanaki & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Spyridon Galatsidas & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2023. "Satisfaction with Media Information about Renewable Energy Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Han, Yoo-Jin, 2007. "Measuring industrial knowledge stocks with patents and papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 269-276.
    13. Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Noel, Laurent & Galariotis, Emilios & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2021. "An ordinal regression approach for analyzing consumer preferences in the art market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 718-733.
    14. Stelzer, Anselmo & Englert, Frank & Hörold, Stephan & Mayas, Cindy, 2016. "Improving service quality in public transportation systems using automated customer feedback," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 259-271.
    15. Ziyuan Tang & Hasan Dinçer, 2019. "Selecting the House-of-Quality-Based Energy Investment Policies for the Sustainable Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Salil K. Sen, 2020. "Decovidization through Rurbanization: The Re-development Option for Sustainable Energy Access," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 515-523.
    17. Elias G. Carayannis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2016. "Using multiobjective mathematical programming to link national competitiveness, productivity, and innovation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 635-655, December.
    18. A. Psomas & I. Vryzidis & A. Spyridakos & M. Mimikou, 2021. "MCDA approach for agricultural water management in the context of water–energy–land–food nexus," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 689-723, March.
    19. Rocha, Phelipe Medeiros da & Barros, Alexandre Pinheiro de & Silva, Glauco Barbosa da & Costa, Helder Gomes, 2016. "Analysis of the operational performance of brazilian airport terminals: A multicriteria approach with De Borda-AHP integration," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 19-26.
    20. Satria, Rd. Okky & Suzanto, Boy & Sidharta, Iwan, 2015. "Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty through Student Perception on Mobile Broadband Usage Based On Consumer Satisfaction Index Model," MPRA Paper 76779, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Aug 2015.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1166-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.