IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v6y2016i4d10.1007_s13412-015-0256-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place and exclusion in New York City’s Jamaica Bay

Author

Listed:
  • Kristen Van Hooreweghe

    (SUNY-Potsdam)

Abstract

New York City’s Jamaica Bay estuary, part of the National Park Service’s Gateway National Recreation Area, sits along the outer edge of the boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens. Along the shores of Jamaica Bay, many residents have developed strong attachments to their neighborhoods, in large part because of the Bay’s folklore as a fishing and tourist spot. Several families of German, Irish, and Italian heritage claim generational attachments to the Bay, while more recent newcomers stake their claim to the Bay through their hard work in New York City’s blue-collar workforce and their wise investment in private property. Although these place attachments have been important for cultivating residents’ relationships to nature along the Bay, the idea of “place” often rests, either intentionally or not, on the exclusion of “others.” Racial tensions and sentiments are largely rooted in the fear that “outsiders” might destroy the character and benefits of “their place.” Although residential segregation is no longer a legitimate means for excluding others, local residents and government officials have mobilized National Park Service land management policies in such a way as to reinforce a sense of belonging, or exclusion, along Jamaica Bay. In so doing, local residents reinforce the relationship bewteen otherness and pollution and create a sense that certain groups, particularly Hindu practitioners, do not belong in “their place.” The exclusionary potential of place, coupled with the legacy of residential segregation and urban infrastructure development, has meant that local residents are able to maintain their access to the waters of Jamaica Bay by erecting and enforcing social distance. Even those residents and visitors not actively engaged in exclusion still benefit, as fewer people feel welcomed to exploring the “National Park experience” at Gateway.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristen Van Hooreweghe, 2016. "Place and exclusion in New York City’s Jamaica Bay," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 753-758, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:6:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-015-0256-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-015-0256-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-015-0256-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-015-0256-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason Byrne & Jennifer Wolch & Jin Zhang, 2009. "Planning for environmental justice in an urban national park," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 365-392.
    2. Richard H Schein, 2009. "Belonging through Land/Scape," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(4), pages 811-826, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Jessica Debats Garrison, 2019. "Seeing the park for the trees: New York’s “Million Trees†campaign vs. the deep roots of environmental inequality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(5), pages 914-930, June.
    3. Kimberly J. Coleman & Elizabeth E. Perry & Dominik Thom & Tatiana M. Gladkikh & William S. Keeton & Peter W. Clark & Ralph E. Tursini & Kimberly F. Wallin, 2020. "The Woods around the Ivory Tower: A Systematic Review Examining the Value and Relevance of School Forests in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Obinna Justice Ubani & Micheal Oloyede Alabi & Emmanuel Ndukwe Chiemelu & Andrew Okosun & Chinwe Sam-Amobi, 2023. "Influence of Spatial Accessibility and Environmental Quality on Youths’ Visit to Green Open Spaces (GOS) in Akure, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Gillian Ramsay & Rachel Dodds & Daniela Furtado & Yana Mykhayletska & Anna Kirichenko & Mana Majedian, 2017. "The Barriers to Millennials Visiting Rouge Urban National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, May.
    6. He, Jialin & Yi, Hongmei & Liu, Jian, 2016. "Urban green space recreational service assessment and management: A conceptual model based on the service generation process," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 59-68.
    7. Daniel R Richards & Tze Kwan Fung & Rachel A T Leong & Uma Sachidhanandam & Zuzana Drillet & Peter J Edwards, 2020. "Demographic biases in engagement with nature in a tropical Asian city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Mahmood AKBARI, 2022. "ANALYSIS OF GREEN SPACES IN THE REGIONS OF SHIRAZ METROPOLIS, IRAN Abstract: Urban parks and green spaces are considered among the most fundamental factors of sustainability in the accelerating growth," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(4), pages 52-67, November.
    9. Catarina De Sousa Silva & Inês Viegas & Τhomas Panagopoulos & Simon Bell, 2018. "Environmental Justice in Accessibility to Green Infrastructure in Two European Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Yuliang Jiang & Yufeng Yang, 2022. "Environmental Justice in Greater Los Angeles: Impacts of Spatial and Ethnic Factors on Residents’ Socioeconomic and Health Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Efrat Eizenberg & Orly Sasson & Mor Shilon, 2019. "Urban Morphology and Qualitative Topology: Open Green Spaces in High-Rise Residential Developments," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 73-85.
    12. Sandra Wajchman-Świtalska & Olga Grabowska-Chenczke & Marcin Woźniak, 2023. "Exploring the Patterns of Recreational Activity among Urban Green Spaces in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Bo-Xun Huang & Wen-Ying Li & Wen-Juan Ma & Hua Xiao, 2023. "Space Accessibility and Equity of Urban Green Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-33, March.
    14. Bo-Sin Tang & Kenneth KH Wong & Kenneth SS Tang & Siu Wai Wong, 2021. "Walking accessibility to neighbourhood open space in a multi-level urban environment of Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1340-1356, June.
    15. Duy Thinh Do & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2019. "A Comparative Study of User Behaviors on Unimproved and Improved Street Spaces in Da Nang, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Li, Zhiming & Fan, Zhengxi & Song, Yan & Chai, Yangbo, 2021. "Assessing equity in park accessibility using a travel behavior-based G2SFCA method in Nanjing, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Xiang Feng & Qian Peng & Yunnan Chen & Weiyue Li, 2022. "A Case Study of the Snow Leopard in Sanjiangyuan National Park Boundaries regarding Park Boundary Divergence," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Josephine Gatti Schafer & Caleb T Gallemore, 2016. "Biases in multicriteria decision analysis: The case of environmental planning in Southern Nevada," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1652-1675, December.
    19. Buchel, Sophie & Frantzeskaki, Niki, 2015. "Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 169-177.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:6:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-015-0256-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.