IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v25y2008i2p209-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Discrepancy Measures for the Optimal Equal Probability Partitioning in Bayesian Multivariate Micro-Aggregation

Author

Listed:
  • George Kokolakis
  • Dimitris Fouskakis

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • George Kokolakis & Dimitris Fouskakis, 2008. "On the Discrepancy Measures for the Optimal Equal Probability Partitioning in Bayesian Multivariate Micro-Aggregation," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(2), pages 209-224, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:25:y:2008:i:2:p:209-224
    DOI: 10.1007/s00357-008-9014-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00357-008-9014-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00357-008-9014-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duncan, George & Lambert, Diane, 1989. "The Risk of Disclosure for Microdata," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 7(2), pages 207-217, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao-Bai Li & Jialun Qin, 2017. "Anonymizing and Sharing Medical Text Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 332-352, June.
    2. Shlomo, Natalie & Skinner, Chris J., 2010. "Assessing the protection provided by misclassification-based disclosure limitation methods for survey microdata," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 39119, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Skinner, Chris J. & Shlomo, Natalie, 2008. "Assessing identification risk in survey microdata using log-linear models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 39112, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Natalie Shlomo & Chris Skinner, 2022. "Measuring risk of re‐identification in microdata: State‐of‐the art and new directions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1644-1662, October.
    5. Sumit Dutta Chowdhury & George T. Duncan & Ramayya Krishnan & Stephen F. Roehrig & Sumitra Mukherjee, 1999. "Disclosure Detection in Multivariate Categorical Databases: Auditing Confidentiality Protection Through Two New Matrix Operators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(12), pages 1710-1723, December.
    6. Braathen, Christian & Thorsen, Inge & Ubøe, Jan, 2022. "Adjusting for Cell Suppression in Commuting Trip Data," Discussion Papers 2022/13, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    7. Gilboa-Freedman, Gail & Smorodinsky, Rann, 2020. "On the properties that characterize privacy," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 59-68.
    8. James Jackson & Robin Mitra & Brian Francis & Iain Dove, 2022. "Using saturated count models for user‐friendly synthesis of large confidential administrative databases," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1613-1643, October.
    9. Shaobo Li & Matthew J. Schneider & Yan Yu & Sachin Gupta, 2023. "Reidentification Risk in Panel Data: Protecting for k -Anonymity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1066-1088, September.
    10. Kokolakis, G. & Fouskakis, D., 2009. "Importance partitioning in micro-aggregation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2439-2445, May.
    11. Christine M. O'Keefe & James O. Chipperfield, 2013. "A Summary of Attack Methods and Confidentiality Protection Measures for Fully Automated Remote Analysis Systems," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(3), pages 426-455, December.
    12. Skinner, Chris J., 2007. "The probability of identification: applying ideas from forensic statistics to disclosure risk assessment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 39105, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. C. J. Skinner, 2007. "The probability of identification: applying ideas from forensic statistics to disclosure risk assessment," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(1), pages 195-212, January.
    14. Xiao-Bai Li & Sumit Sarkar, 2013. "Class-Restricted Clustering and Microperturbation for Data Privacy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 796-812, April.
    15. Xiao-Bai Li & Sumit Sarkar, 2006. "Privacy Protection in Data Mining: A Perturbation Approach for Categorical Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 254-270, September.
    16. S F Roehrig & R Padman & R Krishnan & G T Duncan, 2011. "Exact and heuristic methods for cell suppression in multi-dimensional linked tables," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(2), pages 291-304, February.
    17. Loong Bronwyn & Rubin Donald B., 2017. "Multiply-Imputed Synthetic Data: Advice to the Imputer," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 1005-1019, December.
    18. Tapan K. Nayak & Samson A. Adeshiyan, 2016. "On Invariant Post-randomization for Statistical Disclosure Control," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 26-42, April.
    19. Walter Mãœller & Uwe Blien & Heike Wirth, 1995. "Identification Risks of Microdata," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 24(2), pages 131-157, November.
    20. Myron Gutmann & Kristine Witkowski & Corey Colyer & JoAnne O’Rourke & James McNally, 2008. "Providing Spatial Data for Secondary Analysis: Issues and Current Practices Relating to Confidentiality," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(6), pages 639-665, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:25:y:2008:i:2:p:209-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.