IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v24y2019i3d10.1007_s13253-019-00353-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computer Model Calibration Based on Image Warping Metrics: An Application for Sea Ice Deformation

Author

Listed:
  • Yawen Guan

    (North Carolina State University
    The Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute)

  • Christian Sampson

    (The Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute
    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • J. Derek Tucker

    (Sandia National Laboratories)

  • Won Chang

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • Anirban Mondal

    (Case Western Reserve University)

  • Murali Haran

    (Pennsylvania State University)

  • Deborah Sulsky

    (University of New Mexico)

Abstract

Arctic sea ice plays an important role in the global climate. Sea ice models governed by physical equations have been used to simulate the state of the ice including characteristics such as ice thickness, concentration, and motion. More recent models also attempt to capture features such as fractures or leads in the ice. These simulated features can be partially misaligned or misshapen when compared to observational data, whether due to numerical approximation or incomplete physics. In order to make realistic forecasts and improve understanding of the underlying processes, it is necessary to calibrate the numerical model to field data. Traditional calibration methods based on generalized least-square metrics are flawed for linear features such as sea ice cracks. We develop a statistical emulation and calibration framework that accounts for feature misalignment and misshapenness, which involves optimally aligning model output with observed features using cutting-edge image registration techniques. This work can also have application to other physical models which produce coherent structures. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Yawen Guan & Christian Sampson & J. Derek Tucker & Won Chang & Anirban Mondal & Murali Haran & Deborah Sulsky, 2019. "Computer Model Calibration Based on Image Warping Metrics: An Application for Sea Ice Deformation," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 444-463, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13253-019-00353-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-019-00353-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-019-00353-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-019-00353-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tucker, J. Derek & Wu, Wei & Srivastava, Anuj, 2013. "Generative models for functional data using phase and amplitude separation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 50-66.
    2. S. Conti & J. P. Gosling & J. E. Oakley & A. O'Hagan, 2009. "Gaussian process emulation of dynamic computer codes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 663-676.
    3. Jeremy Oakley, 2002. "Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(4), pages 769-784, December.
    4. Marc C. Kennedy & Anthony O'Hagan, 2001. "Bayesian calibration of computer models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(3), pages 425-464.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suman Majumder & Yawen Guan & Brian J. Reich & Susan O’Neill & Ana G. Rappold, 2021. "Statistical Downscaling with Spatial Misalignment: Application to Wildland Fire $$\hbox {PM}_{2.5}$$ PM 2.5 Concentration Forecasting," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(1), pages 23-44, March.
    2. Dorit Hammerling & Brian J. Reich, 2019. "Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue on “Climate and the Earth System”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 395-397, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reichert, P. & White, G. & Bayarri, M.J. & Pitman, E.B., 2011. "Mechanism-based emulation of dynamic simulation models: Concept and application in hydrology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1638-1655, April.
    2. Priscilla Avegliano & Jaime Simão Sichman, 2023. "Equation-Based Versus Agent-Based Models: Why Not Embrace Both for an Efficient Parameter Calibration?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 26(4), pages 1-3.
    3. Jakub Bijak & Jason D. Hilton & Eric Silverman & Viet Dung Cao, 2013. "Reforging the Wedding Ring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(27), pages 729-766.
    4. Petropoulos, G. & Wooster, M.J. & Carlson, T.N. & Kennedy, M.C. & Scholze, M., 2009. "A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil–vegetation–atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2427-2440.
    5. Gross, Eitan, 2015. "Effect of environmental stress on regulation of gene expression in the yeast," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 224-235.
    6. V. J. Roelofs & M. C. Kennedy, 2011. "Sensitivity Analysis and Estimation of Extreme Tail Behavior in Two‐Dimensional Monte Carlo Simulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(10), pages 1597-1609, October.
    7. Bozağaç, Doruk & Batmaz, İnci & Oğuztüzün, Halit, 2016. "Dynamic simulation metamodeling using MARS: A case of radar simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 69-86.
    8. Raymond K. W. Wong & Curtis B. Storlie & Thomas C. M. Lee, 2017. "A frequentist approach to computer model calibration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(2), pages 635-648, March.
    9. Nott, David J. & Marshall, Lucy & Fielding, Mark & Liong, Shie-Yui, 2014. "Mixtures of experts for understanding model discrepancy in dynamic computer models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 491-505.
    10. Jackson Samuel E. & Vernon Ian & Liu Junli & Lindsey Keith, 2020. "Understanding hormonal crosstalk in Arabidopsis root development via emulation and history matching," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 1-33, April.
    11. SungKu Kang & Ran Jin & Xinwei Deng & Ron S. Kenett, 2023. "Challenges of modeling and analysis in cybermanufacturing: a review from a machine learning and computation perspective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 415-428, February.
    12. Evan Baker & Peter Challenor & Matt Eames, 2021. "Future proofing a building design using history matching inspired level‐set techniques," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 335-350, March.
    13. Mohammadi, Hossein & Challenor, Peter & Goodfellow, Marc, 2019. "Emulating dynamic non-linear simulators using Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 178-196.
    14. Lorenzo Tomassini & Peter Reichert & Hans R. Künsch & Christoph Buser & Reto Knutti & Mark E. Borsuk, 2009. "A smoothing algorithm for estimating stochastic, continuous time model parameters and its application to a simple climate model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(5), pages 679-704, December.
    15. Montserrat Fuentes & Peter Guttorp & Peter Challenor, 2003. "Statistical Assessment of Numerical Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 71(2), pages 201-221, August.
    16. Storlie, Curtis B. & Reich, Brian J. & Helton, Jon C. & Swiler, Laura P. & Sallaberry, Cedric J., 2013. "Analysis of computationally demanding models with continuous and categorical inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 30-41.
    17. O’Hagan, A., 2006. "Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1290-1300.
    18. Vanslette, Kevin & Tohme, Tony & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2020. "A general model validation and testing tool," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    20. Hao Wu & Michael Browne, 2015. "Random Model Discrepancy: Interpretations and Technicalities (A Rejoinder)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 619-624, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s13253-019-00353-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.