IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v23y2018i4d10.1007_s13253-018-0332-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caste-Specific Demography and Phenology in Bumblebees: Modelling BeeWalk Data

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Matechou

    (University of Kent)

  • Stephen N. Freeman

    (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology)

  • Richard Comont

    (Bumblebee Conservation Trust)

Abstract

We present novel dynamic mixture models for the monitoring of bumblebee populations on an unprecedented geographical scale, motivated by the UK citizen science scheme BeeWalk. The models allow us for the first time to estimate bumblebee phenology and within-season productivity, defined as the number of individuals in each caste per colony in the population in that year, from citizen science data. All of these parameters are estimated separately for each caste, giving a means of considerable ecological detail in examining temporal changes in the complex life cycle of a social insect in the wild. Due to the dynamic nature of the models, we are able to produce population trends for a number of UK bumblebee species using the available time-series. Via an additional simulation exercise, we show the extent to which useful information will increase if the survey continues, and expands in scale, as expected. Bumblebees are extraordinarily important components of the ecosystem, providing pollination services of vast economic impact and functioning as indicator species for changes in climate or land use. Our results demonstrate the changes in both phenology and productivity between years and provide an invaluable tool for monitoring bumblebee populations, many of which are in decline, in the UK and around the world. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Matechou & Stephen N. Freeman & Richard Comont, 2018. "Caste-Specific Demography and Phenology in Bumblebees: Modelling BeeWalk Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(4), pages 427-445, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-018-0332-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-018-0332-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-018-0332-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-018-0332-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily B. Dennis & Byron J. T. Morgan & Stephen N. Freeman & David B. Roy & Tom Brereton, 2016. "Dynamic Models for Longitudinal Butterfly Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Shirley Pledger, 2000. "Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 434-442, June.
    3. Emily B. Dennis & Byron J. T. Morgan & Stephen N. Freeman & Tom M. Brereton & David B. Roy, 2016. "A generalized abundance index for seasonal invertebrates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1305-1314, December.
    4. Ben A. Woodcock & Nicholas J. B. Isaac & James M. Bullock & David B. Roy & David G. Garthwaite & Andrew Crowe & Richard F. Pywell, 2016. "Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, November.
    5. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2003. "Open Capture-Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 786-794, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dennis, Emily B. & Kéry, Marc & Morgan, Byron J.T. & Coray, Armin & Schaub, Michael & Baur, Bruno, 2021. "Integrated modelling of insect population dynamics at two temporal scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen N. Freeman & Nicholas J. B. Isaac & Panagiotis Besbeas & Emily B. Dennis & Byron J. T. Morgan, 2021. "A Generic Method for Estimating and Smoothing Multispecies Biodiversity Indicators Using Intermittent Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(1), pages 71-89, March.
    2. Riki Herliansyah & Ruth King & Stuart King, 2022. "Laplace Approximations for Capture–Recapture Models in the Presence of Individual Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 401-418, September.
    3. Jakub Stoklosa & Wen-Han Hwang & Sheng-Hai Wu & Richard Huggins, 2011. "Heterogeneous Capture–Recapture Models with Covariates: A Partial Likelihood Approach for Closed Populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1659-1665, December.
    4. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2010. "Open Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: II. Jolly–Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 883-890, September.
    5. Dennis, Emily B. & Kéry, Marc & Morgan, Byron J.T. & Coray, Armin & Schaub, Michael & Baur, Bruno, 2021. "Integrated modelling of insect population dynamics at two temporal scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    6. Hannah Romanowski & Lauren Blake, 2023. "Neonicotinoid seed treatment on sugar beet in England: a qualitative analysis of the controversy, existing policy and viability of alternatives," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 453-472, September.
    7. Paul S. F. Yip & Hua-Zhen Lin & Liqun Xi, 2005. "A Semiparametric Method for Estimating Population Size for Capture–Recapture Experiments with Random Covariates in Continuous Time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1085-1092, December.
    8. Hajo Holzmann & Axel Munk & Walter Zucchini, 2006. "On Identifiability in Capture–Recapture Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 934-936, September.
    9. Centner, Terence J. & Brewer, Brady & Leal, Isaac, 2018. "Reducing damages from sulfoxaflor use through mitigation measures to increase the protection of pollinator species," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 70-76.
    10. Zhang, Hongmei & Ghosh, Kaushik & Ghosh, Pulak, 2012. "Sampling designs via a multivariate hypergeometric-Dirichlet process model for a multi-species assemblage with unknown heterogeneity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2562-2573.
    11. Blaydes, H. & Potts, S.G. & Whyatt, J.D. & Armstrong, A., 2021. "Opportunities to enhance pollinator biodiversity in solar parks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Murray G. Efford & Christine M. Hunter, 2018. "Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 411-420, June.
    13. Roger Pradel, 2005. "Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 442-447, June.
    14. George Seber & Carl Schwarz, 2002. "Capture-recapture: Before and after EURING 2000," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 5-18.
    15. Stoklosa, Jakub & Huggins, Richard M., 2012. "A robust P-spline approach to closed population capture–recapture models with time dependence and heterogeneity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 408-417.
    16. Francesco Bartolucci & Monia Lupparelli, 2008. "Focused Information Criterion for Capture–Recapture Models for Closed Populations," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 35(4), pages 629-649, December.
    17. B. J. T. Morgan & M. S. Ridout, 2008. "A new mixture model for capture heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(4), pages 433-446, September.
    18. William A. Link, 2003. "Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture-Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1123-1130, December.
    19. Shirley Pledger & Kenneth H. Pollock & James L. Norris, 2003. "Open Capture-Recapture Models with Heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 786-794, December.
    20. Adam Martin-Schwarze & Jarad Niemi & Philip Dixon, 2021. "Joint Modeling of Distances and Times in Point-Count Surveys," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 289-305, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:23:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-018-0332-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.