IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v20y2023i1d10.1007_s12208-021-00330-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Web-disclosure practices for transparency and the sustainability of non-profit organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Ramesh Nair

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA)

  • Roshayani Arshad

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA)

  • Ruhaini Muda

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA)

  • Siti Aeisha Joharry

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA)

Abstract

In times of economic uncertainty, non-profit organisations (NPOs) are struggling to stay afloat as funds diminish and partners prioritise their own survival. This study is anchored to the premise that the sustainability of NPOs is highly dependent on their ability to gain stakeholder trust, and that strategic communication is central to achieving this. We focused on the practices of Malaysian NPOs in measuring and reporting the impact of their programmes. Through an analysis of their official websites, we sought evidence of how programme outcomes were reported and the extent to which NPOs engaged in dialogic communication using readily available multimedia tools. Finally, we devised and tested a programme evaluation instrument for use by Malaysian NPOs when planning for outcome-driven activities. The findings revealed that a significant number of Malaysian NPOs were operating without an official website. Those which had websites generally appeared to provide opportunities for dialogic communication with stakeholders and the wider community. A survey of NPOs suggested that they took dialogic communication seriously and responded to communication in a timely manner. However, the NPOs were less successful in reporting their initiatives in a way that would help them gain stakeholder trust. As such, opportunities to convince potential funders for future activities appear limited, threatening the sustainability of the NPOs. The second phase of the study suggests that the use of the programme evaluation instrument helps in sensitising NPOs about planning for and reporting impactful programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramesh Nair & Roshayani Arshad & Ruhaini Muda & Siti Aeisha Joharry, 2023. "Web-disclosure practices for transparency and the sustainability of non-profit organisations," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:20:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-021-00330-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-021-00330-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-021-00330-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-021-00330-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amélia Carvalho & Marisa R. Ferreira & Sandra Lima, 2020. "Web disclosure of institutional information in nonprofit organizations: an approach in Portuguese charities," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(1), pages 41-58, March.
    2. Carolyn J. Cordery & Louise Crawford & Oonagh B. Breen & Gareth G. Morgan, 2019. "International practices, beliefs and values in not-for-profit financial reporting," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 16-41, January.
    3. Bouten, Lies & Everaert, Patricia & Van Liedekerke, Luc & De Moor, Lieven & Christiaens, Johan, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 187-204.
    4. Cherrie Yang & Deryl Northcott, 2019. "How can the public trust charities? The role of performance accountability reporting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(3), pages 1681-1707, September.
    5. Yang, Cherrie & Northcott, Deryl, 2018. "Unveiling the role of identity accountability in shaping charity outcome measurement practices," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 214-226.
    6. Elisa Ricciuti & Francesca Calò, 2018. "Are foundations assessing their impact? Concepts, methods and barriers to social impact assessment in Italian foundations," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(4), pages 553-574, December.
    7. Connolly, Ciaran & Hyndman, Noel & McConville, Danielle, 2013. "UK charity accounting: An exercise in widening stakeholder engagement," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 58-69.
    8. Cook, Nathan J. & Wright, Glenn D. & Andersson, Krister P., 2017. "Local Politics of Forest Governance: Why NGO Support Can Reduce Local Government Responsiveness," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 203-214.
    9. Rachel Bocquet & Gaëlle Cotterlaz-Rannard & Michel Ferrary, 2020. "How Do NPOs Get Funding? A Business Model Perspective Based on the Conversion of Symbolic Capital," Post-Print hal-02888601, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elka Johansson & Peter Carey & George Tanewski & Iliyas Yusoff, 2022. "The effect of members on charities’ annual reporting: evidence from companies limited by guarantee in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1851-1886, April.
    2. Ellie Norris & Shawgat Kutubi & Steven Greenland, 2023. "Cultural accountability in the annual report: The case of First Nations entities in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4453-4478, December.
    3. Kingston, Kylie L. & Luke, Belinda & Furneaux, Craig & Alderman, Lyn, 2023. "Examining the re-territorialisation of beneficiary accountability: Digitising nonprofit services in response to COVID-19," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    4. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    5. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Soobaroyen, Teerooven & Ntim, Collins G., 2013. "Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 92-109.
    7. Konstantinos Evangelinos & Stefanos Fotiadis & Antonis Skouloudis & Nadeem Khan & Foteini Konstandakopoulou & Ioannis Nikolaou & Shaun Lundy, 2018. "Occupational health and safety disclosures in sustainability reports: An overview of trends among corporate leaders," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 961-970, September.
    8. Bouten, Lies & Everaert, Patricia, 2015. "Social and environmental reporting in Belgium: ‘Pour vivre heureux, vivons cachés’," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 24-43.
    9. Nicolas Garcia‐Torea & Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo & Marta De La Cuesta, 2020. "CSR reporting communication: Defective reporting models or misapplication?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 952-968, March.
    10. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2017. "Does Size Matter? Evaluating Corporate Environmental Disclosure in the Australian Mining and Metal Industry: A Combined Approach of Quantity and Quality Measurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 209-223, February.
    11. Balluchi, Federica & Lazzini, Arianna & Torelli, Riccardo, 2020. "Credibility of Environmental Issues in Non-Financial Mandatory Disclosure: Measurement and Determinants," OSF Preprints g73w5, Center for Open Science.
    12. Dominic Cyr & Suzanne Landry & Anne Fortin, 2023. "Financial Disclosure Management by Charitable Organisations: A Conceptual and Operational Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 46-65, March.
    13. Lee Roberts & Monomita Nandy & Abeer Hassan & Suman Lodh & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 571-595, July.
    14. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Rodríguez-Torres, Tatiana & Barbosa, Alejandra E., 2016. "Greenwashing en la Industria Minera del Carbón a Gran Escala - Evidencias del Caso Colombiano [Greenwashing in the mining industry - Evidences from Colombia]," MPRA Paper 89205, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Gregory Nguh Muluh & Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi & Ngwa Kester Azibo, 2019. "Challenges and Prospects of Sustaining Donor-Funded Projects in Rural Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Stefan Zeisel, 2020. "Is sustainability a moving target? A methodology for measuring CSR dynamics," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 283-296, January.
    17. Waris Ali & Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Zubair Ahmad & Zeeshan Mahmood & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "The Relationship between Social Visibility and CSR Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, March.
    18. Nazrul Islam & Syed Khaled Rahman, 2022. "Corporate Environmental Management Accounting Practicing and Reporting in Bangladesh," Papers 2208.12541, arXiv.org.
    19. Suwen Zheng & Chunhui Ye & Yunli Bai, 2023. "Does Supervision Down to the Countryside Level Benefit Rural Public Goods Supply? Evidence on the Extent of Households’ Satisfaction with Public Goods from 2005 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, May.
    20. Waris Ali & Jedrzej George Frynas & Zeeshan Mahmood, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 273-294, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:20:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-021-00330-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.