IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v19y2021i1d10.1007_s10257-020-00482-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mining sentiment tendencies and summaries from consumer reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Jie Ye

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Anthony J. T. Lee

    (National Taiwan University)

Abstract

Consumer reviews are an invaluable aid for businesses in obtaining consumers’ feedback to facilitate their marketing campaigns. However, the rapidly increasing number of consumer reviews makes it difficult for businesses to obtain a comprehensive view of consumer opinions about their products, especially about the highlighted product features. This study presents a framework to provide an understanding of how consumers’ feedback changes over time and what concerns consumers most. The framework presented here contributes to consumer review analysis in three ways. First, a novel model is proposed to extract the feature words that are semantically relevant to each highlighted product feature. Second, consumers’ feedback on each highlighted product feature is converted into a sentiment tendency graph, which may reflect how the feedback changes over time. Third, consumers’ feedback is also summarized, which may reveal what consumers appreciate and what concerns them most. The experimental results show that the proposed model can effectively extract the feature words for each highlighted feature of the product. Moreover, both sentiment tendency graphs and summaries could complement each other and provide a more detailed picture for consumers and manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Jie Ye & Anthony J. T. Lee, 2021. "Mining sentiment tendencies and summaries from consumer reviews," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 107-135, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:19:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00482-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-020-00482-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-020-00482-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-020-00482-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheng Tun Li & Thuong Thi Pham & Hui Chi Chuang & Zhi-Wei Wang, 2016. "Does reliable information matter? Towards a trustworthy co-created recommendation model by mining unboxing reviews," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 71-99, February.
    2. Satyendra Kumar Sharma & Swapnajit Chakraborti & Tanaya Jha, 2019. "Analysis of book sales prediction at Amazon marketplace in India: a machine learning approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 261-284, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianhong Luo & Shifen Qiu & Xuwei Pan & Ke Yang & Yuanqingqing Tian, 2022. "Exploration of Spa Leisure Consumption Sentiment towards Different Holidays and Different Cities through Online Reviews: Implications for Customer Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Chen, 2020. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Research on personalized recommendation algorithm based on user preference in mobile e-commerce," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 837-850, December.
    2. Vaudrey, Rhonwyn K., 2022. "A practice unpacked: Unboxing as a consumption practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 843-852.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:19:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-020-00482-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.