IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v24y2022i1d10.1007_s10796-020-10078-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Declarative Process and Decision Discovery of the Emergency Care Process

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Mertens

    (Ghent University)

  • Frederik Gailly

    (Ghent University)

  • Diederik Sassenbroeck

    (AZ Maria Middelares)

  • Geert Poels

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

Deviations and variations are the norm rather than the exception in medical diagnosis and treatment processes. Physicians must leverage their knowledge and experience to choose an appropriate variation for each patient. However, this knowledge and experience is often tacit. Process modeling offers a way to convert tacit to explicit knowledge. Many process mining techniques have been developed due to the difficulty of doing this manually, yet, they often neglect the decisions themselves, and these proposed techniques are just one piece of a comprehensive process discovery method. In this paper, we use the Action Design Research methodology to develop a method for process and decision discovery of medical diagnosis and treatment processes. The method was iteratively improved and validated by applying it to a practical setting, which was the emergency medicine department of a hospital. An analysis of the resulting model shows that previously tacit knowledge was successfully made explicit.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Mertens & Frederik Gailly & Diederik Sassenbroeck & Geert Poels, 2022. "Integrated Declarative Process and Decision Discovery of the Emergency Care Process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 305-327, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:24:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10078-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10078-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10078-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-020-10078-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunwoo Kim & Yongmoo Suh, 2011. "Semantic business process space for intelligent management of sales order business processes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 515-542, September.
    2. Bernard Kamsu-Foguem & Germaine Tchuenté-Foguem & Clovis Foguem, 2014. "Using conceptual graphs for clinical guidelines representation and knowledge visualization," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 571-589, September.
    3. Riccardo Cognini & Flavio Corradini & Stefania Gnesi & Andrea Polini & Barbara Re, 0. "Business process flexibility - a systematic literature review with a software systems perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-29.
    4. Chris Kimble & José Braga Vasconcelos & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1119-1130, December.
    5. Riccardo Cognini & Flavio Corradini & Stefania Gnesi & Andrea Polini & Barbara Re, 2018. "Business process flexibility - a systematic literature review with a software systems perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 343-371, April.
    6. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 0. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Bendik Bygstad & Egil Øvrelid & Thomas Lie & Magnus Bergquist, 2020. "Developing and Organizing an Analytics Capability for Patient Flow in a General Hospital," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 353-364, April.
    8. Krzysztof Kluza & Grzegorz J. Nalepa, 2019. "Formal Model of Business Processes Integrated with Business Rules," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1167-1185, October.
    9. Davide Duma & Roberto Aringhieri, 2020. "An ad hoc process mining approach to discover patient paths of an Emergency Department," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 6-34, March.
    10. Pedro Antunes & Jose A. Pino & Mary Tate & Alistair Barros, 2020. "Eliciting Process Knowledge Through Process Stories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1179-1201, October.
    11. Remco Dijkman & Sander Vincent Lammers & Ad Jong, 2016. "Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 717-734, August.
    12. Amit V. Deokar & Omar F. El-Gayar, 2011. "Decision-enabled dynamic process management for networked enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 655-668, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    2. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    3. Anke Joubert & Matthias Murawski & Markus Bick, 2023. "Measuring the Big Data Readiness of Developing Countries – Index Development and its Application to Africa," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 327-350, February.
    4. Antonia Terán-Bustamante & Antonieta Martínez-Velasco & Andrée Marie López-Fernández, 2021. "University–Industry Collaboration: A Sustainable Technology Transfer Model," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Ikram Bououd & Sana Rouis Skandrani & Imed Boughzala & Mohamed MAKHLOUF, 2016. "Impact of object manipulation, customization and social loafing on competencies management in 3D Virtual Worlds," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1191-1203, December.
    6. Efpraxia D. Zamani & Anastasia Griva & Kieran Conboy, 2022. "Using Business Analytics for SME Business Model Transformation under Pandemic Time Pressure," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1145-1166, August.
    7. Gürdal Ertek & Gül Tokdemir & Mete Sevinç & Murat Mustafa Tunç, 2017. "New knowledge in strategic management through visually mining semantic networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 165-185, February.
    8. Yu-Hsi Yuan & Sang-Bing Tsai & Chien-Yun Dai & Hsiao-Ming Chen & Wan-Fei Chen & Chia-Huei Wu & Guodong Li & Jiangtao Wang, 2017. "An empirical research on relationships between subjective judgement, technology acceptance tendency and knowledge transfer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Jan Mendling & Jan Recker & Hajo A. Reijers & Henrik Leopold, 2019. "An Empirical Review of the Connection Between Model Viewer Characteristics and the Comprehension of Conceptual Process Models," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1111-1135, October.
    10. José Braga Vasconcelos & Chris Kimble & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "A special issue on knowledge and competence management: Developing Enterprise solutions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1035-1039, December.
    11. Beatriz Ferreira & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira, 2022. "The Contribution of Knowledge Management to Human Resource Development: a Systematic and Integrative Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2319-2347, September.
    12. David Schuff & Karen Corral & Robert D. St. Louis & Greg Schymik, 2018. "Enabling self-service BI: A methodology and a case study for a model management warehouse," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 275-288, April.
    13. Bimba, Andrew Thomas & Idris, Norisma & Al-Hunaiyyan, Ahmed & Mahmud, Rohana Binti & Abdelaziz, Ahmed & Khan, Suleman & Chang, Victor, 2016. "Towards knowledge modeling and manipulation technologies: A survey," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 857-871.
    14. Amany Elbanna & Yogesh Dwivedi & Deborah Bunker & David Wastell, 0. "The Search for Smartness in Working, Living and Organising: Beyond the ‘Technomagic’," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-6.
    15. Juan M. Alberola & Luis Búrdalo & Vicente Julián & Andrés Terrasa & Ana García-Fornes, 2014. "An adaptive framework for monitoring agent organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 239-256, April.
    16. Jurij JakliÄ & Vesna Bosilj-VukÅ¡ić & Jan Mendling & Mojca Indihar Å temberger, 2021. "The Orchestration of Corporate Performance Management and Business Process Management and Its Effect on Perceived Organizational Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    17. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 2020. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1377-1418, December.
    18. Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu, 2021. "Exploring the Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. R. Ramesh & H. Raghav Rao, 2011. "Editorial," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 451-452, September.
    20. Krzysztof Krukowski & Magdalena Raczyńska, 2019. "Attributes of Process Maturity of Public Administration Units in Poland," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:24:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10078-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.