IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fosoec/v40y2011i1p7-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Social Economics Concepts for Future Research

Author

Listed:
  • James Stanfield

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • James Stanfield, 2011. "Some Social Economics Concepts for Future Research," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 7-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fosoec:v:40:y:2011:i:1:p:7-17
    DOI: 10.1007/s12143-010-9065-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12143-010-9065-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12143-010-9065-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Ronald Stanfield, 1991. "The Dichotomized State," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 765-780, September.
    2. Stanfield, James Ronald & Stanfield, Jacqueline B., 1997. "Where has love gone? Reciprocity, redistribution, and the Nurturance Gap," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 111-126.
    3. Doug Brown, 1987. "A Hungarian Connection: Karl Polanyi’s Influence on the Budapest School," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 339-347, March.
    4. James Ronald Stanfield, 1995. "Economics, Power and Culture," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-23712-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Stanfield, 2011. "Some Social Economics Concepts for Future Research," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 7-17, January.
    2. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Economic Surplus, Social Reproduction, Nurturance and Love," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 19-40, April.
    3. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Economic Surplus, Social Reproduction, Nurturance and Love," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 19-40, January.
    4. Edward O’Boyle, 2011. "The Acting Person: Social Capital and Sustainable Development," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 79-98, April.
    5. George Liagouras, 2016. "From Heterodox Political Economy to Generalized Darwinism," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 467-484, September.
    6. Lee, Frederic, 2011. "Heterodox surplus approach: production, prices, and value theory," MPRA Paper 31824, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Stanfield’s Concepts of Social and Political Economy: Introduction to the Special Issue," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 1-5, January.
    8. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Stanfield’s Concepts of Social and Political Economy: Introduction to the Special Issue," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 1-5, April.
    9. Victor Pelaez, 2005. "Science And Governance In The National Systems Of Innovation Approach," Working Papers 0010, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Economics.
    10. Miller, N. J., 2001. "Contributions of social capital theory in predicting rural community inshopping behavior," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 475-493.
    11. Jackson, William A., 2015. "Distributive Justice With and Without Culture," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(6), pages 673-688.
    12. Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "When Berle and Galbraith brought political economy back to life : Study of a cross-fertilization (1933-1967)," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    13. Georg D. Blind & Raji Steineck, 2021. "The missing piece in E. Cassirer’s theory of symbolic forms: the economy," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 291-315, April.
    14. Taylor, Robert, 1998. "The ethic of care versus the ethic of justice: an economic analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 479-493.
    15. Stanfield, James Ronald & Stanfield, Jacqueline B., 1997. "Where has love gone? Reciprocity, redistribution, and the Nurturance Gap," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 111-126.
    16. Kunibert Raffer, 2011. "Neoliberal Capitalism: A Time Warp Backwards to Capitalism’s Origins?," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 41-62, January.
    17. James Stanfield & Michael Carroll, 2009. "The Social Economics of Neoliberal Globalization," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fosoec:v:40:y:2011:i:1:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.