IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v31y2019i1d10.1007_s10696-018-9305-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation of shift and break flexibility with real-time break assignments using a rolling horizon approach

Author

Listed:
  • Youngbum Hur

    (The University of Texas)

  • Jonathan F. Bard

    (The University of Texas)

  • Markus Frey

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Ferdinand Kiermaier

    (Technical University of Munich)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the benefits that flexibility offers in daily shift scheduling, especially when demand is uncertain. The different forms of flexibility considered include shift start times, the number of breaks, break lengths, and break placement. Five related mixed-integer programming models are developed and used to compare break scheduling in advance and either sequentially or in real time for various shift and break profiles. The first model integrates the shift and break assignments while the second model assigns shifts only. The third and fourth models assume an optimal set of shifts. In the former case, the goal is to assign as many breaks as possible without violating demand requirements; in the latter case, the objective is to minimize undercoverage while ensuring that all shifts receive their required breaks. The fifth model takes a rolling horizon approach and provides the greatest advantage when responding to unexpected demand fluctuations over the day. Tests were performed using work requirements for ground handlers at a major European airport and showed in part that when demand is known and the most flexible break type is used, the total uncovered periods in a day can be decreased by up to 94% (down from 270 to 16). When demand is uncertain, we found that using our rolling horizon procedure reduces undercoverage by up to 41% compared to scheduling breaks in advance.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngbum Hur & Jonathan F. Bard & Markus Frey & Ferdinand Kiermaier, 2019. "An investigation of shift and break flexibility with real-time break assignments using a rolling horizon approach," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 174-211, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:31:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10696-018-9305-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-018-9305-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-018-9305-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-018-9305-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Gary M. & Pullman, Madeleine E., 2007. "Scheduling workforce relief breaks in advance versus in real-time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 139-155, August.
    2. Parisio, Alessandra & Neil Jones, Colin, 2015. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach to employee scheduling in retail outlets with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 97-103.
    3. Banu Sungur & Cemal Özgüven & Yasemin Kariper, 2017. "Shift scheduling with break windows, ideal break periods, and ideal waiting times," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 203-222, June.
    4. Monia Rekik & Jean-François Cordeau & François Soumis, 2004. "Using Benders Decomposition to Implicitly Model Tour Scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 111-133, April.
    5. Kibaek Kim & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2015. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Integer Programming Approach to Integrated Staffing and Scheduling with Application to Nurse Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1431-1451, December.
    6. Tolga Çezik & Oktay Günlük, 2004. "Reformulating linear programs with transportation constraints—With applications to workforce scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(2), pages 275-296, March.
    7. Ferdinand Kiermaier & Markus Frey & Jonathan F. Bard, 2016. "Flexible cyclic rostering in the service industry," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1139-1155, December.
    8. Gary M. Thompson, 1995. "Improved Implicit Optimal Modeling of the Labor Shift Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 595-607, April.
    9. Hadi W. Purnomo & Jonathan F. Bard, 2007. "Cyclic preference scheduling for nurses using branch and price," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 200-220, March.
    10. Stephen E. Bechtold & Larry W. Jacobs, 1990. "Implicit Modeling of Flexible Break Assignments in Optimal Shift Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(11), pages 1339-1351, November.
    11. Smet, Pieter & Brucker, Peter & De Causmaecker, Patrick & Vanden Berghe, Greet, 2016. "Polynomially solvable personnel rostering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 67-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pieter Smet & Annelies Lejon & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2021. "Demand smoothing in shift design," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 457-484, June.
    2. M. I. M. Wahab & C. -G. Lee & P. Sarkar, 2023. "A real options approach to value manufacturing flexibilities with regime-switching product demand," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 864-895, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferdinand Kiermaier & Markus Frey & Jonathan F. Bard, 2020. "The flexible break assignment problem for large tour scheduling problems with an application to airport ground handlers," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 177-209, April.
    2. Arpan Rijal & Marco Bijvank & Asvin Goel & René de Koster, 2021. "Workforce Scheduling with Order-Picking Assignments in Distribution Facilities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 725-746, May.
    3. Banu Sungur & Cemal Özgüven & Yasemin Kariper, 2017. "Shift scheduling with break windows, ideal break periods, and ideal waiting times," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 203-222, June.
    4. Jens O. Brunner & Jonathan F. Bard & Jan M. Köhler, 2013. "Bounded flexibility in days‐on and days‐off scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(8), pages 678-701, December.
    5. Mark W. Isken & Osman T. Aydas, 2022. "A tactical multi-week implicit tour scheduling model with applications in healthcare," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 551-573, December.
    6. Idris Addou & François Soumis, 2007. "Bechtold-Jacobs generalized model for shift scheduling with extraordinary overlap," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 177-205, November.
    7. Alex Bonutti & Sara Ceschia & Fabio De Cesco & Nysret Musliu & Andrea Schaerf, 2017. "Modeling and solving a real-life multi-skill shift design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 252(2), pages 365-382, May.
    8. Volland, Jonas & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2017. "A column generation approach for the integrated shift and task scheduling problem of logistics assistants in hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 316-334.
    9. Ağralı, Semra & Taşkın, Z. Caner & Ünal, A. Tamer, 2017. "Employee scheduling in service industries with flexible employee availability and demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 159-169.
    10. Sana Dahmen & Monia Rekik & François Soumis, 2018. "An implicit model for multi-activity shift scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 285-304, June.
    11. Melanie Erhard, 2021. "Flexible staffing of physicians with column generation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 212-252, March.
    12. Aykin, Turgut, 2000. "A comparative evaluation of modeling approaches to the labor shift scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 381-397, September.
    13. Brusco, Michael J. & Johns, Tony R., 1996. "A sequential integer programming method for discontinuous labor tour scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 537-548, December.
    14. Gary M. Thompson, 1997. "Labor staffing and scheduling models for controlling service levels," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(8), pages 719-740, December.
    15. Michael J. Brusco & Larry W. Jacobs, 2000. "Optimal Models for Meal-Break and Start-Time Flexibility in Continuous Tour Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(12), pages 1630-1641, December.
    16. Jonathan F. Bard & Lin Wan, 2008. "Workforce Design with Movement Restrictions Between Workstation Groups," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 24-42, November.
    17. Giovanni Felici & Claudio Gentile, 2004. "A Polyhedral Approach for the Staff Rostering Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 381-393, March.
    18. Tristan Becker & Pia Mareike Steenweg & Brigitte Werners, 2019. "Cyclic shift scheduling with on-call duties for emergency medical services," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 676-690, December.
    19. Restrepo, María I. & Gendron, Bernard & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2017. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for multi-activity tour scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 620-635.
    20. Robbins, Thomas R. & Harrison, Terry P., 2010. "A stochastic programming model for scheduling call centers with global Service Level Agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1608-1619, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:31:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10696-018-9305-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.